If Brueckner is Never Charged.

[barrier]

from The Sun
No context

worthless

Strangely you'll believe he has concrete evidence yet when saying they have no forensics to say she is dead is unreliable.

[barrier]

The police are following the evidence.  They are not creating "the legend" by making it up as they go along then "printing the legend" in a book of opinions and lies written by a convicted perjurer.

If Brueckner is never charged in relation to offences against Madeleine it will be partly because there there is no supporting evidence thirteen years down the line.

Unlike thirteen years ago when information was fresh ... particularly mobile phone communications readily available at the time but not fully interrogated.

Unfortunately the police focus was on the McCann party and not until 2011 when I believe Scotland Yard took in the broader picture of the data was the full potential for the investigative use of such information realised.

The only way for him to involved is to have knocked down Madeleine in his car and because of past history, disposed of and hightailed it away,  prove it wrong  prosecutor, perfect defence. No evidence of intruder or a breakin in 5a.

[carlymichelle]

The only way for him to involved is to have knocked down Madeleine in his car and because of past history, disposed of and hightailed it away,  prove it wrong  prosecutor, perfect defence. No evidence of intruder or a breakin in 5a.

and if maddie woke and wandered thats  the mcanns  responsibility

[Mr Gray]

The only way for him to involved is to have knocked down Madeleine in his car and because of past history, disposed of and hightailed it away,  prove it wrong  prosecutor, perfect defence. No evidence of intruder or a breakin in 5a.

The open window which it seems was his normal MO is evidence of an intruder. Everything depends on what this strong evidence is that HCW says he has

[faithlilly]

The open window which it seems was his normal MO is evidence of an intruder. Everything depends on what this strong evidence is that HCW says he has

Shame the parents didn’t check that the windows were locked when they left their children alone eh.

[G-Unit]

Shame the parents didn’t check that the windows were locked when they left their children alone eh.

It's believable of a couple of teenagers, but not a pair of mature doctors imo. Strolling off and leaving three babies without even the protection of a locked door, never mind the window.

[Mr Gray]

It's believable of a couple of teenagers, but not a pair of mature doctors imo. Strolling off and leaving three babies without even the protection of a locked door, never mind the window.

If you have followed the case you would understand they thought the shutters were added security and couldn't be opened from the outside

[Brietta]

Then again maybe the guy never met Maddie in his entire life and whole thing is a concoction?

I don't think we have an 'Amaral concoction' here.  I think we have honest hard working police work following years of evidence some of which goes back to the night before Madeleine's disappearance and as I have seen it suggested in print or film, Brueckner's disappearance either then or shortly thereafter.

I believe when he returned he was driving the Winnebago.

[Brietta]

Or he had nothing to do with it in the first place.

If there is evidence to charge him ... he will be charged.  If there is no evidence ... he won't be.

Please do remember there was no evidence against Madeleine's parents, and I see no sceptics suggesting that is because they "had nothing to do with it in the first place."  Or am I missing something?

[Brietta]

The only way for him to involved is to have knocked down Madeleine in his car and because of past history, disposed of and hightailed it away,  prove it wrong  prosecutor, perfect defence. No evidence of intruder or a breakin in 5a.

If there is evidence to support charging Brueckner regarding Madeleine's abduction, we shall just have to wait and see what defence will be presented on his behalf. 

For some reason I don't think it will be the one you suggest.

Not everyone has an apparent visceral need to disprove the presence of an intruder who committed the offence against Madeleine.
Much as no-one tried to pretend Brueckner's American rape victim was wandering the streets and Brueckner didn't illegally invade her home ... of which by the way, I have never seen or heard reports of forced entry.

He left one tiny trace of himself in the villa which was found and retained but which could have so easily been overlooked.

[barrier]

If there is evidence to charge him ... he will be charged.  If there is no evidence ... he won't be.

Please do remember there was no evidence against Madeleine's parents, and I see no sceptics suggesting that is because they "had nothing to do with it in the first place."  Or am I missing something?

Don't know,but this thread is not about the McCann's,try and stay on topic.

[G-Unit]

If you have followed the case you would understand they thought the shutters were added security and couldn't be opened from the outside

Did they say that or is it just your opinion of what they thought?

[Mr Gray]

Did they say that or is it just your opinion of what they thought?

If you remember both Kate and Gerry went ouside to check if the shutters could be opened from the outside

[G-Unit]

If you remember both Kate and Gerry went ouside to check if the shutters could be opened from the outside

Why did it matter, it wasn't the only way in.

[Mr Gray]

Why did it matter, it wasn't the only way in.

because the window was open obviously