What evidence exists that MM's disappearance was sexually motivated?

[Robittybob1]

Hi Sadie, I totally agree with you. Brückner’s Austrian close friend, Michael Tatschl said that he is certain Brückner took Madeleine but that he did not murder her. Instead, he sold her.

Is that right?

[Eleanor]

Hi Sadie, I totally agree with you. Brückner’s Austrian close friend, Michael Tatschl said that he is certain Brückner took Madeleine but that he did not murder her. Instead, he sold her.

Keep on hoping.

I don't know what I am thinking of with this man.  I look at his photograph and I don't get any bad vibes for Madeleine.

No, I am not physic.  I just sense what I feel.

[Eleanor]

Hi Sadie, I totally agree with you. Brückner’s Austrian close friend, Michael Tatschl said that he is certain Brückner took Madeleine but that he did not murder her. Instead, he sold her.

Madeleine was worth more to him alive than dead.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

No, there hasn't been, at least not in the same way.  In fact no one knows what he did to small children because it hasn't been reported in detail.

Well the only place I read details of what he did to children (or a child) was here... and there were several lurid posts about rape and torture committed, it was said, by a German sex offender.... Apologies if I missed it but I don't recall you stating that sort of discussion was off limits here.

[Eleanor]

Well the only place I read details of what he did to children (or a child) was here... and there were several lurid posts about rape and torture committed, it was said, by a German sex offender.... Apologies if I missed it but I don't recall you stating that sort of discussion was off limits here.

There have been No Lurid Posts, mainly because I will not allow them.  Me personally.  And everyone knows that by now.  I will not have them.

I have no control over Links to Newspaper Articles so long as the article itself is not posted on here.

[misty]

Madeleine was worth more to him alive than dead.

This is horrifying but -
Rather like a stolen work of art, the value to the purchaser becomes a burden and subsequently worthless. Maybe her value lay in death, not life.

[Holly Goodhead]

There have been No Lurid Posts, mainly because I will not allow them.  Me personally.  And everyone knows that by now.  I will not have them.

I have no control over Links to Newspaper Articles so long as the article itself is not posted on here.

I can't see any reason why anyone here would need to discuss in any sort of detail what may or may not have happened to MM IF she fell into the hands of a paedophile.  But I can't see either why anyone would object to a thread to discuss whether any evidence existed to suggest the disappearance was sexually motivated? 

KM does in fact describe her worst fears in graphic detail in her book. 

[jassi]

I can't see any reason why anyone here would need to discuss in any sort of detail what may or may not have happened to MM IF she fell into the hands of a paedophile.  But I can't see either why anyone would object to a thread to discuss whether any evidence existed to suggest the disappearance was sexually motivated? 

KM does in fact describe her worst fears in graphic detail in her book.

We're not supposed to talk about that either- apparently 

[John]

Afaik all we know for sure is that MM disappeared?  A number of theories have been put forward re motive but what evidence exists to support sexual over all others?

None whatsoever.  All that is known for sure is that she was last seen by independent witnesses around 5.30pm and reported missing shortly after 10pm.

[Mr Gray]

None whatsoever.  All that is known for sure is that she was last seen by independent witnesses around 5.30pm and reported missing shortly after 10pm.

TBH thats like saying there is no evidence maddie is dead but we know from past experience that it is likely that she is.

If maddie was abducted by a starnger its highly likely it was a paedophile

[Mr Gray]

what i find very telling about sceptics bevaiour is their dismissal of the possibility of strong evidence against Breukner.

If the PJ anounced tomorrow that they had strong evidence that the parents were involvedI would not dismiss it and be very interested to see what it was.

[jassi]

There may be strong evidence against Brueckner, but the Germans don't seem to be in any hurry to put it to the test.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There may be strong evidence against Brueckner, but the Germans don't seem to be in any hurry to put it to the test.

They have the rest of the year at least to put together their case - he isn't going anywhere and as they're certain Madeleine is dead, they can take their time to construct a case that will (hopefully) stick.  They don't have to run it by you first either.

[kizzy]

TBH thats like saying there is no evidence maddie is dead but we know from past experience that it is likely that she is.

If maddie was abducted by a starnger its highly likely it was a paedophile

What if it wasn't a stranger then what.

This has been my point for long enough..there is no proof Maddie was ever abducted.

Any re-investigation should be started from the beginning not halfway through.

IMO it has always seemed half-hearted as if they have just plodded on with no real motivation just going through the motions.

The PJ started it... ended with shelving the case. but even now their suspects were not cleared of any involvement.

However many prime suspects have there been.

[jassi]

They have the rest of the year at least to put together their case - he isn't going anywhere and as they're certain Madeleine is dead, they can take their time to construct a case that will (hopefully) stick.  They don't have to run it by you first either.

As requested, comment duly ignored