Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 129317 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #75 on: August 25, 2020, 12:21:32 AM »
She didn’t run to “any tapas bar”, she searched the apartment and then ran to get help from her husband and friends, who happened to be in the OC Tapas bar.  What is incredible about that?  Where is the time wasting?
Am being pernickerty here.  They were NOT actually in the Tapas Bar; they were in the Tapas restaurant , which was next door, but separate

Offline Brietta

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #76 on: August 25, 2020, 02:08:26 AM »
The run up to Kate's arguida interview was as follows ...

Snip
And how exactly are you supposed to prepare for being interrogated in a foreign language about the abduction of your child?
All I could do was to tell the police the truth – again – and hope that was what they were actually interested in
____________________________________________________________

I was due at the police station in Portimão at 2pm.
I finally went in for my interview at 2.55pm.
____________________________________________________________

At one point early on, something was read out from my initial statement, given on 4 May. It wasn’t quite accurate and I explained to the officer that the original meaning seemed to have been lost slightly in translation. To my astonishment, the interpreter became quite angry and suddenly interrupted, ‘What are you saying? That we interpreters can’t do our job? The interpreter will only have translated what you told her!’
____________________________________________________________

At 5pm, we had a fifteen-minute break, which I spent standing in the corridor outside the interrogation room.
We stopped again at 7.50pm, supposedly for five minutes. I was getting tired by now and hoping it
would all be finished fairly soon. No such luck. Those five minutes stretched into two and a quarter hours.
____________________________________________________________

I heard later that he’d (Gerry) twice come back to Portimão in the hope of collecting Trisha and me. At midnight he was sent home.
____________________________________________________________

It was 12.40am by the time the interview – and the attendant rigmarole of having it translated into Portuguese and then read back to me in English by the interpreter – was over. I was told I would have to return at ten o’clock in the morning.
I left the station with Trish, Carlos and Sofia a little after 1am.
____________________________________________________________

It must have been close to 4am when Carlos and Sofia left, saying they would see me at the police station later that morning.
____________________________________________________________

It was almost 5am when we finally got to bed.


madeleine  ...  Kate McCann
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #77 on: August 25, 2020, 08:06:54 AM »
Do you really think after 13 years they are still looking at the McCanns. Despite what the SC said I think the Mccans were ruled out years  ago

Not according to the highest court in Portugal but then you know this very well but still continue to deny it.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #78 on: August 25, 2020, 08:10:57 AM »
Not according to the highest court in Portugal but then you know this very well but still continue to deny it.

As I've said ...what did the SC say..
Did they say the McCanns are not ruled out or did they say...they were not ruled out by the arching report.

I'll have to check...there is s massive difference between the too.

Having said that I think it's clear they are ruled out. I think the SC judgement was perverse and will be heavily criticised by the ECHR...which could lead to amarals book being banned

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #79 on: August 25, 2020, 08:11:36 AM »
perhaps someone could remind us what the SC said...wasn't it that the McCanns were not ruled out by the archiving report....not that they were not ruled out...theres a difference...a big difference

You can spin it any way you like but the McCanns claimed that they had been cleared and the Portuguese Supreme Court felt it necessary to state otherwise.

A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #80 on: August 25, 2020, 08:13:46 AM »
As I've said ...what did the SC say..
Did they say the McCanns are not ruled out or did they say...they were not ruled out by the arching report.

I'll have to check...there is s massive difference between the too.

Having said that I think it's clear they are ruled out. I think the SC judgement was perverse and will be heavily criticised by the ECHR...which could lead to amarals book being banned

I'm not in the habit f repeating myself but for your benefit on this occasion I will do so.

Until Madeleine is found all investigative opportunities remain open.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #81 on: August 25, 2020, 08:15:32 AM »
You can spin it any way you like but the McCanns claimed that they had been cleared and the Portuguese Supreme Court felt it necessary to state otherwise.



this is something else...of course they havent been proved innocent because a court never rules anyone innocent. Even if they had been tried and found guilty they would not have been proven innocent. have the needhams who were suspects been proven innocent...no.

has barry george been proven innocent...NO


It is a crazy statement from the Sc which imo shows they are not fit for purpose. they have a poor record at teh ECHR

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #82 on: August 25, 2020, 08:16:35 AM »
this is something else...of course they havent been proved innocent because a court never rules anyone innocent. Even if they had been tried and found guilty they would not have been proven innocent. have the needhams who were suspects been proven innocent...no.

has barry george been proven innocent...NO


It is a crazy statement from the Sc which imo shows they are not fit for purpose. they have a poor record at teh ECHR

It is what it is.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #83 on: August 25, 2020, 08:17:37 AM »
I'm not in the habit f repeating myself but for your benefit on this occasion I will do so.

Until Madeleine is found all investigative opportunities remain open.

and i would say its clear the McCanns have been ruled out of this investiagtion and are not being investigated. SY have told us as much. .....so it seems SY have ruled them out and they are not being investigated

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #84 on: August 25, 2020, 08:18:53 AM »
It is what it is.

Gunit showed some figures...the SC loses almost 9 out of ten cases that are heard at the ECHR

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #85 on: August 25, 2020, 08:21:07 AM »
remember the SC in its judgement lists the staement taht the dogs alert to cadaver is  a proven fact...we know the SC is  a100% wrong there....so can they be trusted to get the facts right

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #86 on: August 25, 2020, 08:22:04 AM »
I'm not in the habit f repeating myself but for your benefit on this occasion I will do so.

Until Madeleine is found all investigative opportunities remain open.
Are the McCanns currently under investigation then? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #87 on: August 25, 2020, 08:33:23 AM »
Are the McCanns currently under investigation then?

A stupid question.  Since they haven't been cleared of involvement by the very country in which the missing kid disappeared and since they haven't managed to pin it on some unfortunate German paedophile or some dead guy from the Azores then this case is still wide open imo.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2020, 08:37:26 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #88 on: August 25, 2020, 08:33:48 AM »
i have just read the judgement again. It says the mCcanns were not cleared by the archiving despatch,,,that was 2008. Therefore the SC were referring to the situation in 2008, 12 years ago...not now.

Rowley made it clear the mcCanns were not being investigating and he was happy their involvemnet had been dealt with...he regarded them as not being involved..cleared. obviously if new evidence comes to light things could change.

No where can I see the statement that the McCanns have not been proven innocent...i dont think the SC said that..if they did they should all be sacked.

I dont see anyone calling for CB to prove hes innocent. Thats a disgrace to justice and and any court making that statement is  adisgrace and not fit for purpose..imo

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #89 on: August 25, 2020, 08:35:23 AM »
A stupid question.

only stupid in as much as they are not...you and john both believe taht Maddie woke and wandered ...which rules out their involvement in any hiding of  a body