Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 129369 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #960 on: September 09, 2020, 06:44:54 PM »
Didn't Gerry see it ?

And Amy Tierney ?

That makes at least three.   Please correct me if I am wrong.

Then they went an interfered with a crime scene, allegedly knowing Madeleine was abducted.Some one shut it,if it was open in the first place.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #961 on: September 09, 2020, 06:46:19 PM »
Well, you believe it was,  so answer the question please VS.

Why didn't kmc close it before she ran out?
No idea.  Panic? Or maybe she was hoping he’d come back for the other two cos she was sick to death of them?  Yeah, that will be it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #962 on: September 09, 2020, 06:47:51 PM »
Then they went an interfered with a crime scene, allegedly knowing Madeleine was abducted.Some one shut it,if it was open in the first place.
LOL.  One sceptic criticising them for not shutting the window, another sceptic criticising them for closing the window.  Perfect!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #963 on: September 09, 2020, 06:54:03 PM »
No idea.  Panic? Or maybe she was hoping he’d come back for the other two cos she was sick to death of them?  Yeah, that will be it.

Ok seems you can't answer then.

So still strange why she didn't then.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #964 on: September 09, 2020, 06:58:35 PM »
Ok seems you can't answer then.

So still strange why she didn't then.
I did answer, but as I’m not her it may not be the right answer.  Do you expect me to know the right answer?

If they were  faking an abduction by opening the window why did they not leave it open for the police to see?  A question for you to answer now.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2020, 07:01:12 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #965 on: September 09, 2020, 07:09:29 PM »
I did answer, but as I’m not her it may not be the right answer.  Do you expect me to know the right answer?

If they were  faking an abduction by opening the window why did they not leave it open for the police to see?  A question for you to answer now.

Maybe I believe because it was never open in the first place.

Why would u run out leaving twins with a window left wide open. when one child had gone within the last 25mims

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #966 on: September 09, 2020, 07:23:57 PM »
Maybe I believe because it was never open in the first place.

Why would u run out leaving twins with a window left wide open. when one child had gone within the last 25mims
So you believe they SAID the window was open but didn’t bother to actually FAKE a break in at all.  What a lazy pair, eh?  Couldn’t even be bothered to stage a convincing break in, tsk.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #967 on: September 09, 2020, 07:34:11 PM »
The shutter twisted and got stuck/jammed re crime scene photos. So they nearly got damaged but NOT by an abductor.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #968 on: September 09, 2020, 07:48:05 PM »
The shutter twisted and got stuck/jammed re crime scene photos. So they nearly got damaged but NOT by an abductor.

We may well have some real answers in the next month or so... All those claims from you and your ilk may well look pretty silly... Let's, wait and see.

Offline barrier

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #969 on: September 10, 2020, 06:08:07 AM »
The open window is sign of an intruder
That's it? no wonder it's taken all these years with still no conclusion.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #970 on: September 10, 2020, 08:50:09 AM »
AT (Amy Tierney) not really sure.

Why do you say that Amy wasn't sure, Kizzy?   Amy clearly says that the shutter was raised and the window half open in her statement.   In fact she reiterates it twice in her statement.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/AMY-ELLEN-TIERNEY.htm

Snip -
She confirms that, on the night of the disappearance she was onduty and immediately went to the bedroom to see if the girl washiding. * She saw that the shutter was raised and that the windowwas partially open.*   It was then that she began to look in thewardrobes to see if the girl was hiding.

The first idea that occurred to her was that the girl could haveleft by her own means, * however after checking that the windowwas open and the shutter raised * she asked the parents whetherMadeleine's shoes were there, to which they replied that theywere, these facts led her to think that Madeleine could havebeen taken by someone.


Are you telling a porkie there Kizzy, or have I missed something?

Amy's evidence is clear. What isn't clear is how she saw something which the other person present didn't see;

when she arrived both the parents and a female friend of theirs whose name she does not know, were there
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/AMY-ELLEN-TIERNEY.htm

Amy's evidence is not confirmed by any of the McCann's female friends. Fiona Payne was there from 10:10 and the window and shutters were closed.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #971 on: September 10, 2020, 08:57:28 AM »
AT (Amy Tierney) not really sure.

Why do you say that Amy wasn't sure, Kizzy?   Amy clearly says that the shutter was raised and the window half open in her statement.   In fact she reiterates it twice in her statement.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/AMY-ELLEN-TIERNEY.htm

Snip -
She confirms that, on the night of the disappearance she was onduty and immediately went to the bedroom to see if the girl washiding. * She saw that the shutter was raised and that the windowwas partially open.*   It was then that she began to look in thewardrobes to see if the girl was hiding.

The first idea that occurred to her was that the girl could haveleft by her own means, * however after checking that the windowwas open and the shutter raised * she asked the parents whetherMadeleine's shoes were there, to which they replied that theywere, these facts led her to think that Madeleine could havebeen taken by someone.


Are you telling a porkie there Kizzy, or have I missed something?

Nothing sinister Sadie - just I  wasn't sure if it was Amy Tierrney or not.

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #972 on: September 10, 2020, 09:24:11 AM »
Maybe I believe because it was never open in the first place.

Why would u run out leaving twins with a window left wide open. when one child had gone within the last 25mims

Kate searched the apartment,  she looked out of the window.  Kate was there for over five minutes why would an abductor who had just taken a child stay outside for that length of time?   

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #973 on: September 10, 2020, 09:52:27 AM »
Kate searched the apartment,  she looked out of the window.  Kate was there for over five minutes why would an abductor who had just taken a child stay outside for that length of time?






Why was she there that length of time when she knew straight away Maddie had been taken.

Still ran out leaving window wide open


Offline carlymichelle

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #974 on: September 10, 2020, 10:08:38 AM »





Why was she there that length of time when she knew straight away Maddie had been taken.

Still ran out leaving window wide open

kates fingerprints were on the window too