Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 129793 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1005 on: September 11, 2020, 02:33:42 PM »
That's not by far the only thing though ...is it.
It must blow your (not remotely) tiny mind that the police are not investigating the McCanns seeing as how obvious it is they dunnit in your view.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1006 on: September 11, 2020, 02:36:13 PM »
That's not by far the only thing though ...is it.

If there is all this evidence what are the PJ doing about it... HCW wants to charge CB.  Do the PJ want to cgarge the McCanns... How is their investigation going

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1007 on: September 11, 2020, 03:02:43 PM »
If there is all this evidence what are the PJ doing about it... HCW wants to charge CB.  Do the PJ want to cgarge the McCanns... How is their investigation going

The PJ did try and do something ...but were stopped in there tracks by the UK interfering.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1008 on: September 11, 2020, 03:03:18 PM »
If there is all this evidence what are the PJ doing about it... HCW wants to charge CB.  Do the PJ want to cgarge the McCanns... How is their investigation going
Don't worry, won't be long now...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1009 on: September 11, 2020, 03:04:05 PM »
The PJ did try and do something ...but were stopped in there tracks by the UK interfering.
Pussies.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1010 on: September 11, 2020, 03:07:48 PM »
Pussies.

Seems so ...IMO GA was on the right track that's why he needed to go.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1011 on: September 11, 2020, 03:12:21 PM »
Seems so ...IMO GA was on the right track that's why he needed to go.
yep, the British government forced him out as they knew he was getting too close to the truth and it could have destroyed Blair.  Or was it Brown?  Anyway, yeah.  They had to get rid of him as it was a matter of national security and if he ever reveals his Ace, well, he's more or less signed his death warrant.  He'd be Novichocked.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1012 on: September 11, 2020, 03:16:00 PM »
The PJ did try and do something ...but were stopped in there tracks by the UK interfering.

Are you claiming the PJ believe the McCanns are guilty but are doing nothing because SY told them not to

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1013 on: September 11, 2020, 03:33:57 PM »
Are you claiming the PJ believe the McCanns are guilty but are doing nothing because SY told them not to

I believe the mccs are involved ...so Did PJ ...you know the rest so why ask.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1014 on: September 11, 2020, 03:36:04 PM »
I believe the mccs are involved ...so Did PJ ...you know the rest so why ask.
Because it's a barmy idea imo...

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1015 on: September 11, 2020, 03:38:45 PM »
Because it's a barmy idea imo...

Well it will be when it doesnt fit in with what you want it too.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1016 on: September 11, 2020, 03:58:29 PM »
Well it will be when it doesnt fit in with what you want it too.

It isn't supported by evidence.. I think it's a crackpot idea that the McCanns are only free because the UK government is supporting  them... Why would the UK govt support s couple of criminal doctors... That's barmy

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1017 on: September 11, 2020, 08:16:16 PM »
I wouldn't say she was covering her ass,  more defending herself against allegations that she staged an abduction.  Wouldn't you want to put the record straight.  Why didn't Amaral think to himself that maybe Kate had looked out of the window instead of jumping to the conclusion she must have opened it to stage an abduction?
Did he ever say she staged the abduction?   
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline sadie

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1018 on: September 12, 2020, 01:09:00 AM »
 ()678%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet

Hmm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet

This monster, Baphomet, was worshipped by my suspect.   As was Dionysis, God of wine and liberal love (rampant sex)

Seems The General is interested in Baphomet too.  He mentioned him/her/the goat in one of his posts recently


Several very unsavoury characters were also associated with Baphomet if you read the Wikipedia before it is rapidly changed, as it probably will be now.

Offline sadie

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1019 on: September 12, 2020, 02:38:20 AM »
Gerry said that Kate had told him the window was open when she entered the apartment....nice bit of deniability there. Tierney saw the window open several minutes after the alarm was raised. Strangely Tanner, Oldfield and O’Brien failed to see an open window on their various checks.

Oh dear, do we have to go over this yet again?

It was windy, the trees surrounding the place were fondy and rather like a willow as they moved in the breeze, and as Tanner, Oldfield and O'Brien passed by along the road they would be looking ahead.  No reason to look thru waving branches at a place in near darkness.   

They would reach the drive in entrance to the car park and be looking at the place which everyone had to start walking along to get to their flats.  This walled pathway started in the centre of the big block which IIRC is called block 5.  As they reached the drive in entrance their eyes would be focused on the start of the pathway

At this stage, Madeleines window was way out of their periferal vision and in darkness as the moon had not yet risen.   The street lights, which were poor, had their lamps within the heads of the trees, so little light from them.
As they walked across the carpark closer to the pathway entrance Madeleines window went further and further into their periferal vision.
With no chance of seeing it at all once they were on the approach pathway.  Totally out of sight.


No chance of seeing Madeleines window for any part of the walk unless they, for some specific reason, were specially interested in it and swivelled their heads, or eyes.


Please just drop all this nonsense about Jane, Matt and Rob not seeing her window was open ... and accept the scientific fact that people cannot see outside their periferal vision.

FGS give The McCanns a break.   Instead of bullying them continually with inane ideas that are scientifically shown to be wrong.