Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[barrier]

I think you will find its obvious to a lot more people than me.

Imo judging by your posts its some sort of game, not you want the truth. ..more you just want to be proved right.

Think you would be wise to change your signature.

To be fair the line doesn't say what the author is right about.

[Mr Gray]

I think you will find its obvious to a lot more people than me.

Imo judging by your posts its some sort of game, not you want the truth. ..more you just want to be proved right.

Think you would be wise to change your signature.

Why do you and others feel the need to constantly ctiticise me...its pathetic imo....and I certainly dont need any advice from you....I think I have  afar better undersatnding of the case

Again.....I think its clear  Wolters has proof of abduction but the evidence providing this does not FULLY implicate CB. Proof of abduction is  agood start

[kizzy]

Why do you and others feel the need to constantly ctiticise me...its pathetic imo....and I certainly dont need any advice from you....I think I have  afar better undersatnding of the case

Again.....I think its clear  Wolters has proof of abduction but the evidence providing this does not FULLY implicate CB. Proof of abduction is  agood start

Probably the arrogance of your posts. when at the end of the day you're a poster with opinions the same as us all.

CB seems he is going to be the latest abduction suspect nothing more ...wether u understand the evidence or not doesnt mean your opinion makes it right.

[Mr Gray]

Probably the arrogance of your posts. when at the end of the day you're a poster with opinions the same as us all.

CB seems he is going to be the latest abduction suspect nothing more ...wether u understand the evidence or not doesnt mean your opinion makes it right.

So you admit you constantly criticise me because you perceive me as arrogant....LOL

[G-Unit]

could be video or photos......death could be confirmed but not precisely who caused daeth

No, he said the same evidence points to Madeleine's death and CB's having killed her.

[Mr Gray]

 photo or video with proof of Maddies death but not  astrong enough link to CB...its easy when you think about it

[G-Unit]

photo or video with proof of Maddies death but not  astrong enough link to CB...its easy when you think about it

The same evidence, Wolters claims, shows two things.

1. Madeleine is dead
2. CB killed her

Perhaps he's unable to confirm either claim.

[Mr Gray]

The same evidence, Wolters claims, shows two things.

1. Madeleine is dead
2. CB killed her

Perhaps he's unable to confirm either claim.

hes talking about evidence not proof..

the piece of evidence he has might be very strong for death...but not so strong for CBs involvemnet

[kizzy]

hes talking about evidence not proof..

the piece of evidence he has might be very strong for death...but not so strong for CBs involvemnet

the piece of evidence he has might be very strong for death

All I can think about that then is the dogs.

He wouldn't discuss it on MS interview. yet seems he didn't deny it.

[kizzy]

So you admit you constantly criticise me because you perceive me as arrogant....LOL

NoI don't criticise you IMO its arrogance that thinks I do.

[Mr Gray]

the piece of evidence he has might be very strong for death

All I can think about that then is the dogs.

He wouldn't discuss it on MS interview. yet seems he didn't deny it.

the Dogs....LOL....i think you need to have another think.

the alerts actually rule out CB if they are genuine

[jassi]

the piece of evidence he has might be very strong for death

All I can think about that then is the dogs.

He wouldn't discuss it on MS interview. yet seems he didn't deny it.

A photograph wouldn't really be evidence of death, unless it showed injuries incompatible with life

[faithlilly]

Thought they were all working together just shows they are not.

SY seems to be still treating it as a missing case or why else would they need another year's funding.

More or less what we have been saying

It’s an about-turn from the prosecutor who has previously claimed police have “concrete” evidence Madeleine is dead.

Now he’s told podcast They’ve Taken Her: “Maybe we need more witnesses or photos or video.”

He added: "Maybe we need one witness who can tell us the things we don’t know.”

A friend of the McCann family said: “It feels like he is trying to lower expectations after coming out all guns blazing.

"It’s heartbreaking for Kate and Gerry.”

It’s heartbreaking that there isn’t enough evidence to convict a violent paedophile of their daughter’s murder ? What a strange claim.

[Mr Gray]

A photograph wouldn't really be evidence of death, unless it showed injuries incompatible with life

A photo or video of abuse would be evidence of death...as in the RUI Pedro case because most abuse is followed by death....but it wouldnt be absolute proof. That ties in a exactly with waht Wolters has said

[jassi]

Certainly not the best expressed  soundbite from the 'family pal'