Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

All we  are seeeing here is sour grapes from the PJ because they are totally embarrassed at being made to look stupid by the Germans.

Not as embarrassed as some ...when they don't.

We will see...

[Brietta]

When did the investigation into the McCann begin?

When were they interviewed/questioned?

Where were the interviews held?

Did the McCanns travel to Germany or did the Germans interview them here?

Why the need for such secrecy?

I think Brueckner was brought to German police attention as a direct result of a tenth anniversary television appeal made by her parents on Madeleine's behalf.

There has been a very big window between then and now for the Germans to have investigated suspects and interviewed witnesses and it appears they did just that.

Nobody gave a thought to Brueckner or even wondered why the Germans tried him for a rape carried out in Praia da Luz until Amaral's Australian podcast 'revelation' which rather put the kibosh on anyone continuing with discrete inquiries into Madeleine's case.

But up until then the Germans were playing their hand very close to their chest.  Maybe you could drop them a FOI request?

[kizzy]

I think Brueckner was brought to German police attention as a direct result of a tenth anniversary television appeal made by her parents on Madeleine's behalf.

There has been a very big window between then and now for the Germans to have investigated suspects and interviewed witnesses and it appears they did just that.

Nobody gave a thought to Brueckner or even wondered why the Germans tried him for a rape carried out in Praia da Luz until Amaral's Australian podcast 'revelation' which rather put the kibosh on anyone continuing with discrete inquiries into Madeleine's case.

But up until then the Germans were playing their hand very close to their chest.  Maybe you could drop them a FOI request?

Wasnt it the germans who named him ...not GA.

[jassi]

Wasnt it the germans who named him ...not GA.

Named by the Media, rather than German officials

[Brietta]

Wasnt it the germans who named him ...not GA.

Mark Saunokonoko
@saunokonoko
14 months ago, in April 2019, Goncalo Amaral told me British police were "preparing the end of the investigation, with a German paedophile who is in prison right now" and the prisoner "is probably going to be the scapegoat for the case." https://9news.com.au/world/madeleine-mccann-german-paedophile-took-maddie-uk-police-amaral-claim-podcast/cc225ca6-7123-4182-985c-89888224bd09
 #McCann

Stephen H
@StephenH88
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Yes that was my first thought when the news broke. Excellent podcast series Mark.

Replying to
@saunokonoko
First thing I thought when I heard this tonight after listening to pod last year, strange

Suzanna Matos
@ubeeelha
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Of course they need a scapegoat! Care to explain all the conflicting statements, lack of holiday photos of Maddie, cadaver dogs, etc... oh yes, the German did it all!

Rob Barber
@robbarber1
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
As soon as I read this news today, I remembered you discussing this on the podcast Mark!

NessWine glassWine glassRed heartWinking face with tongueHibiscusRosePeacockTropical drink
@JustNessie4971
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
I remember that on your podcast, Amaral saying that and he was bang on the money weren't he ?
We know exactly where the cops should be looking but obviously they'd rather pin it on this guy.

Sharon Lawrence
@5haronl
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Well they are trying very hard to get a scapegoat for the McCann case. It won’t work, everyone knows there was no sign of an intransigent the dogs alerted to human blood and cadaver.  What they don’t realise is that Madeleine died 4 days earlier than reported.

Juliemcr
@JulieHarrigan4
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Dogs don’t lie !

[kizzy]

Mark Saunokonoko
@saunokonoko
14 months ago, in April 2019, Goncalo Amaral told me British police were "preparing the end of the investigation, with a German paedophile who is in prison right now" and the prisoner "is probably going to be the scapegoat for the case." https://9news.com.au/world/madeleine-mccann-german-paedophile-took-maddie-uk-police-amaral-claim-podcast/cc225ca6-7123-4182-985c-89888224bd09
 #McCann

Stephen H
@StephenH88
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Yes that was my first thought when the news broke. Excellent podcast series Mark.

Replying to
@saunokonoko
First thing I thought when I heard this tonight after listening to pod last year, strange

Suzanna Matos
@ubeeelha
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Of course they need a scapegoat! Care to explain all the conflicting statements, lack of holiday photos of Maddie, cadaver dogs, etc... oh yes, the German did it all!

Rob Barber
@robbarber1
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
As soon as I read this news today, I remembered you discussing this on the podcast Mark!

NessWine glassWine glassRed heartWinking face with tongueHibiscusRosePeacockTropical drink
@JustNessie4971
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
I remember that on your podcast, Amaral saying that and he was bang on the money weren't he ?
We know exactly where the cops should be looking but obviously they'd rather pin it on this guy.

Sharon Lawrence
@5haronl
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Well they are trying very hard to get a scapegoat for the McCann case. It won’t work, everyone knows there was no sign of an intransigent the dogs alerted to human blood and cadaver.  What they don’t realise is that Madeleine died 4 days earlier than reported.

Juliemcr
@JulieHarrigan4
·
Jun 3
Replying to
@saunokonoko
Dogs don’t lie !

ofgs Where does he mention CB or his name.

He said a german scapegoat, yes but he didn't name who it was.

[G-Unit]

It is possible to take them at their word and to also make allowances for imperfect recall, or inaccurate statement recording and/or translation.  I know this hugely unreasonable behaviour but there we are.  Do you think “highlighting a tiny piece of evidence and blowing it up out of all proportion” is a good game to play?

The devil is in the detail. It's there that changes, inconsistences and glossed over facts are found. Explaining them by blaming imperfect recall, trauma or inadequate statement taking is speculation, not fact.

[Mr Gray]

The devil is in the detail. It's there that changes, inconsistences and glossed over facts are found. Explaining them by blaming imperfect recall, trauma or inadequate statement taking is speculation, not fact.

Assuming the statements are accurate is speculation not fact. None of us know why the inconsistencies are there...to assume a reason is speculation....To assume they were recorded and read back accurately is speculation...you are as guilty of speculation as anyone

[Robittybob1]

Do you understand why there are uhms and ahs in the rogs but not in the PJ statements....

Do the Portuguese use different words?

[Eleanor]

Do the Portuguese use different words?

A lot of foreign words are not directly translatable.

[Robittybob1]

A lot of foreign words are not directly translatable.

What do the French say rather than " uhms and ahs"?

[Mr Gray]

Do the Portuguese use different words?

I would think that those critical of the ums and ahs have never seen a transcript of an audio recorder police statement

[Eleanor]

What do the French say rather than " uhms and ahs"?

Ers.

[Vertigo Swirl]

When did the investigation into the McCann begin?

When were they interviewed/questioned?

Where were the interviews held?

Did the McCanns travel to Germany or did the Germans interview them here?

Why the need for such secrecy?

just to piss you off I expect.  When did your investigation into the McCanns begin?  When did you interview them?  Where did you hold the interviews?  Did you travel to Rothley?  Obviously you wouldn't have been able to draw any conclusions about their involvement without conducting a throrugh investigation, so do tell. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Assuming the statements are accurate is speculation not fact. None of us know why the inconsistencies are there...to assume a reason is speculation....To assume they were recorded and read back accurately is speculation...you are as guilty of speculation as anyone

exactly.