Kate McCann's unanswered questions.

[Angelo222]

If there was a can of worms to be opened it would have been opened by now.  There is no can and the only worm the police are interested in is the one in a German prison.

Had the German police been doing their job properly this worm would have been taken out of society a long time ago. But obviously the attraction of the Maddie case has proven irresistible.

As to Kate's unanswered questions, her lawyer panicked when the Portuguese police told him that both parents were to be made arguidos.  IMO he too thought them guilty and that is why he told them not to answer the questions.

[Angelo222]

1. On May 3, 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?

Imo that question alone could have been the most simplest to answer.

Or the hardest to explain why she was she in there 10 mins.

Why did she do that when the window was allegidly wide open and Maddie was not there.

As every one insists its only a few metres away so what was she doing for 9 mins when she knew maddie had been abducted.

The entire thing is questionable. If your child disappeared from a ground floor holiday apartment and the bedroom window was wide open I am willing to bet the first thing you would do is run out the front door to the carpark and search for her.

Not so with Kate McCann if she is to be believed. She ran off in the opposite direction leaving the other two babies alone and unprotected. She didn't even close the supposedly open window.

No wonder Paiva and Amaral weren't convinced.

[G-Unit]

This thread is about questions Kate McCann had answered previously, prior to her arguido questions.  On this thread Faithlilly claimed Kate had never answered questions on the disappearance.  Here is your list again.  I have bolded the ones you claim Kate gave answers to.  Can you spot any that relate to the disappearance?

1. On May 3, 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?

2. Did you search inside the master bedroom wardrobe? NO

3. (Shown two photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents? NO

4. Why was the curtain by the sofa near the side window tampered with? Did someone go behind the sofa? NO

5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected Madeleine’s disappearance?

6. Why did you say Madeleine had been abducted?

7. Assuming Madeleine was abducted, why did you leave the twins to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? The supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.

8. Why didn’t you ask the twins then what happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on? NO

9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say – what were your exact words?

10. What happened after you raised the alarm there?

11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?

12. Who contacted the authorities? NO

13. Who took place in the searches? NO

14. Did anyone outside the group learn of her disappearance in those following minutes? NO

15. Did any neighbour offer you help? NO

16. What does “we let her down” mean? NO

17. Did Jane Tanner tell you that night she’d seen a man with a child? NO

18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted? NO

19. During the searches, with the police there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way? NO

20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs? NO

21. Who did you phone after the occurrence? NO

22. Did you call Sky News? NO

23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor? NO

24. Did you ask for a priest? NO

25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means? NO

26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving? NO

27. What was your behaviour that night? NO

28. Did you manage to sleep? NO

29. Before travelling to Portugal, did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling? NO

30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like? NO

31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication? NO

32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister? NO

33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates? NO

34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked? NO

35. What is your medical speciality?

36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services? NO

37. Did you work every day? NO

38. At a certain point you stopped working. Why? NO

39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness? NO

40. Is it true sometimes you despaired at your children’s behaviour and it left you feeling very uneasy? NO

41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative? NO

42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication? NO

43. In the case files, you were shown canine forensic testing films. After watching them, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, carried out in a British lab, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

Additionally, you supplied links to Kate McCann's statements in which she clearly answers questions surrounding the disappearance.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN.htm
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_ARGUIDO.htm
Do I need to explain any further?

The thread was set up to decide whether it was true that Kate McCann had previously answered the questions asked in her arguida interview, as claimed. It isn't true, because I identified quite a lot of them which were not answered previously. Hopefully the claim will not be repeated in the future.

[Eleanor]

The thread was set up to decide whether it was true that Kate McCann had previously answered the questions asked in her arguida interview, as claimed. It isn't true, because I identified quite a lot of them which were not answered previously. Hopefully the claim will not be repeated in the future.

No you haven't.  And I shall repeat it if I choose.

[Brietta]

The thread was set up to decide whether it was true that Kate McCann had previously answered the questions asked in her arguida interview, as claimed. It isn't true, because I identified quite a lot of them which were not answered previously. Hopefully the claim will not be repeated in the future.

What do you suppose the Judicial police were doing with their time if they hadn't already asked the majority of these crucial questions between Kate's first interrogation on 4rd May and her last interrogation on 6th September prior to being constituted arguida.

As a witness she was obliged to answer all questions put to her during that time. 

If you think the PJ waited until she had the right as an arguida not to answer ... why on earth do you suppose they didn't ask them when she had no option but to answer.

I know the initial investigation was botched, but I doubt even they could have failed to ask the basics, so why do you think they were as incompetent as that?

[Eleanor]

What do you suppose the Judicial police were doing with their time if they hadn't already asked the majority of these crucial questions between Kate's first interrogation on 4rd May and her last interrogation on 6th September prior to be constituted arguida.

As a witness she was obliged to answer all questions put to her during that time. 

If you think the PJ waited until she had the right as an arguida not to answer ... why on earth do you suppose they didn't ask them when she had no option but to answer.

I know the initial investigation was botched, but I doubt even they could have failed to ask the basics, so why do you think they were as incompetent as that?

Because they were incompetent?

[faithlilly]

Faith posted..





24. Did you ask for a priest ? No.

Had she been asked that before ? Her answer of course was dishonest.

That's incorrect..faith saw your NO and presumed it was Kate's..I asked for a cite..none given...blatant disregard for rules

You are correct I did read G’s answer as Kate’s and for that I apologise. My point still stands. After being made an arguida Kate refused to answer any questions regarding her 10pm check and her subsequent activities. She also refused to answer any questions about her or her family’s life.

Virtually all the questions posted by G had not been answered in previous interviews by Kate. That is simply a fact.

[Eleanor]

You are correct I did read G’s answer as Kate’s and for that I apologise. My point still stands. After being made an arguida Kate refused to answer any questions regarding her 10pm check and her subsequent activities. She also refused to answer any questions about her or her family’s life.

Virtually all the questions posted by G had not been answered in previous interviews by Kate. That is simply a fact.

You simply don't know this.  What do you think The PJ were doing during that very long interview?  They were asking every question they could think of and then later reiterated when they knew that Kate no longer had to answer.

[Mr Gray]

You are correct I did read G’s answer as Kate’s and for that I apologise. My point still stands. After being made an arguida Kate refused to answer any questions regarding her 10pm check and her subsequent activities. She also refused to answer any questions about her or her family’s life.

Virtually all the questions posted by G had not been answered in previous interviews by Kate. That is simply a fact.

I have never said they were not...it seems Eleanor made a mistaken claim...as you did ... and g saw fit to start a while thread on it. I think it was quite over the top. I think there were totally valid reasons for Kate not to answer those questions but it would harm her defence if she later relied on in court any replies she had not made at the time.

Same for CB...if he fails when questioned to answer it will be his own defence he's harming.

As I recall Michael Stone was convicted almost solely on his confession to another con...the court took it seriously and the prosecutor was not laughed out of court. I think there's a lot more on CB

[faithlilly]

You simply don't know this.  What do you think The PJ were doing during that very long interview?  They were asking every question they could think of and then later reiterated when they knew that Kate no longer had to answer.

We simply do know that.

[faithlilly]

I have never said they were not...it seems Eleanor made a mistaken claim...as you did ... and g saw fit to start a while thread on it. I think it was quite over the top. I think there were totally valid reasons for Kate not to answer those questions but it would harm her defence if she later relied on in court any replies she had not made at the time.

Same for CB...if he fails when questioned to answer it will be his own defence he's harming.

As I recall Michael Stone was convicted almost solely on his confession to another con...the court took it seriously and the prosecutor was not laughed out of court. I think there's a lot more on CB

I’ll just leave this here.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/stone-witness-retracts-evidence-1.207412

[Brietta]

I’ll just leave this here.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/stone-witness-retracts-evidence-1.207412

I'll leave this.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-50316890

[G-Unit]

So you taught all us supporters a lesson, whilst turning a blind eye to a blatantly false statement that was posted on the thread by a sceptic because....?

Did all of you 'supporters' think that Kate McCann had previously answered those questions then? How do you know that?

[Robittybob1]

It's not Kate's answer it's gunits ..no

No = means (if I'm not wrong too) Kate gave NO answer.

[Mr Gray]

No = means (if I'm not wrong too) Kate gave NO answer.

faith thought kate said no and accused kate of being dishonest