Are The Tabloids Running Scared?

[G-Unit]

You are joking of course. 
1.  He was happy to undermine The Cipriano case by telling lies.   To try and get them a longer jail sentence.   But that is OK by you, is it?   

2.  Oh and then there was an assortment of lies in his "O Enigma writings" as pointed out at the time. 

3.  And there was the lie told to Gerry on the day that he and Kate were taken in for separate questioning.   Gerry knew that it was a total lie and it must have been at that stage Gerry realised that they were definitely being stitched up.

4.  Various  other lies blaming the Mccanns  with absolutely no proof, which I am sure other posters will be able to detail

5.  And of course, the Courts found him out with lies that criminalized him.  Deliberate PERJURY and by a senior PJ Officer.  Disgusting.

6.  And I ask myself, why did he authorise the changing of Processos 809 which was compiled by PJ officers on the spot up in Porto.  He negated that in order to produce another Processos 807-808, which was full of dis/misinformation.   The original Processos 809 was about a man (Anglo-Portuguese(?)), who took a taxi from near Campanha (Porto) railway station carrying a little girl who appeared to be sleeping at mid-day.   This was on the morning of the 4th May 2007.   The taxi driver dropped them off near ?79 Rua Andre de Castro, in Vila Nova de Gaia, also Porto, but on the other side of the river Douro.   

So much detail was changed in the later 808-809 807-808 Processos and much of it was wrong..   I went there and checked it out.   I think that S.I.L also has done some checking and found that what I said was correct.  I have seen it written by him somewhere, maybe on here when I was in hospital, or maybe on his blog.  It was good to see him agreeing with me.
Amaral even changed the railway station from Campanha in Porto to the railway station in Vila Nova de Gaia, also Porto.   Why did he do this?  FGS the Taxi driver knew which station he was  picked up at.

I think I counted 5 facts that he altered from the original.  Why?

7.  Then there were the sightings up near Porto/ Giumares areas.  Some of these he 'disallowed'. with excuses such as: 'Given by an old lady' etc.

8.  Why weren't the multiple sightings from Malta/ Gozo given any publicity ? 
There were 29 [Twenty Nine!] sightings in all, but only people who delved into that pathway, really deeply, found them.  I initially only came across them from trying to puzzle out the writing and runes from Matt James.   He mentioned them on his site.   Why didn't Amaral, as far as I know, investigate them at all?  I never heard him mention them and 29 of them !

Sorry to keep going on Gen (Sir) but do you still find Amaral a truthful man that you can trust?


I just can't understand why he ignored things that he should have delved into and why he changed Processos


Definitely NOT a man to be trusted IMO based upon these facts.

One last thing:  You say that he has his mens respect and trust ... hahahah!   
His wife publicly complained that his officers did not give him the usual send off after his last day at the PJ Office.   I wonder why?   


All the above is either my opinion or fact.  Most is fact

Matthew James? I'm afraid I can't take anyone who listens to such charlatans seriously. Here's just one of his flights of fancy, dated July 2007. We know now it wasn't something which was going to happen to the McCanns in connection with Madeleine;

Choosing the photograph above of Madeleine McCann, who I call the Shining Star, for 'photographic psychometry' ... to gain a sense or any impressions of what is around her. Immediately I saw an event which I can only glean to be 'of the future' .... Kate McCann wearing a white top flinging her arms out to catch a running little girl in her arms. Kate has a handbag with shoulder strap (can this be confirmed??) which had to be put on the ground moments before. Kate's face is smiling; there are tears in her eyes. Gerry appears to be crying too.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t7719-a-new-madeleine-picture-matt-james

[Erngath]

Matthew James? I'm afraid I can't take anyone who listens to such charlatans seriously. Here's just one of his flights of fancy, dated July 2007. We know now it wasn't something which was going to happen to the McCanns in connection with Madeleine;

Choosing the photograph above of Madeleine McCann, who I call the Shining Star, for 'photographic psychometry' ... to gain a sense or any impressions of what is around her. Immediately I saw an event which I can only glean to be 'of the future' .... Kate McCann wearing a white top flinging her arms out to catch a running little girl in her arms. Kate has a handbag with shoulder strap (can this be confirmed??) which had to be put on the ground moments before. Kate's face is smiling; there are tears in her eyes. Gerry appears to be crying too.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t7719-a-new-madeleine-picture-matt-james

I must admit I've read none of Matthew James views or opinions,  so you may be correct in naming  him a charlatan.
Do you think him to be as well known as Richard D Hall who has many fans and followers.
Would you  label him as a charlatan  and not take seriously anyone who shares his views .

[Brietta]

Who cares? I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd rather he backed his men as opposed to throwing them under the wagon. None of us know what they've collectively been through. They've probably seen more depravity in a day's police work than we see in a lifetime.
He still has their respect and trust, even to this day no doubt, and in law enforcement or the military there's few things more important.
Perjury? Pffft, that's a token gesture. Move along.

Quite a predictable response justifying torture of a prisoner while in custody and in my opinion a shameful one.

Now that you have got that off your chest ~ what is your opinion of whether or not the tabloids are running scared, it is the thread topic after all.

[kizzy]

Quite a predictable response justifying torture of a prisoner while in custody and in my opinion a shameful one.

Now that you have got that off your chest ~ what is your opinion of whether or not the tabloids are running scared, it is the thread topic after all.

I think its more you have to get it off your chest with your constant criticism of GA it was wrong but that should be that, he is no different IMO to police as a whole. IMO

It's only similar to the torture/greif the famlys of Hillsborough went through because of all the lies from  David Duckenfield, as a South Yorkshire police chief superintendent

He also admitted at the inquests that even as the event was descending into horror and death, he had infamously lied, telling Graham Kelly, then secretary of the Football Association, that Liverpool fans were to blame,

The tabloids were running stories everyday on CB month in month out, it could be quite possible in my opinion that they could have had the German equivalent to Carter Ruck on there back... for them to be so qiet

[The General]

Quite a predictable response justifying torture of a prisoner while in custody and in my opinion a shameful one.

Now that you have got that off your chest ~ what is your opinion of whether or not the tabloids are running scared, it is the thread topic after all.

I take your apparent indignation as a ringing endorsement of my stance.

If you care to read further up the thread you'll see my stance on 'the media running scared'; they're not. As usual the thread title is loaded with bias and purposely leading.

[Brietta]

John Canaan is the chief suspect in the Suzi Lamplugh case,the police have even questioned him,yet with out the evidence to prosecute,Wolters can't even get that far.

Canaan is a man convicted of sexual offences and murder and currently I believe a long term guest of Her Majesty.

Do you suggest the police should have ignored evidence which in their opinion might have connected him to another murder?

[jassi]

Quite the opposite.
As barrier has indicated, UK Police questioned this man while in prison, in contrast to Wolters, who appears not to have questioned Brueckner.

[G-Unit]

I must admit I've read none of Matthew James views or opinions,  so you may be correct in naming  him a charlatan.
Do you think him to be as well known as Richard D Hall who has many fans and followers.
Would you  label him as a charlatan  and not take seriously anyone who shares his views .

I assume people only quote those who they deem worthy of being quoted. I googled Matthew James and I would neither pay attention to his fantasies nor quote him.

I haven't taken much notice of Richard D Hall and have never quoted him, so cannot comment. Is he a "Psychic Medium" who reads the runes and offers psychic consultations on the telephone too?

[Erngath]

I assume people only quote those who they deem worthy of being quoted. I googled Matthew James and I would neither pay attention to his fantasies nor quote him.

I haven't taken much notice of Richard D Hall and have never quoted him, so cannot comment. Is he a "Psychic Medium" who reads the runes and offers psychic consultations on the telephone too?

He possibly does but I couldn't really say
.... one way or another.
He makes dreadful accusations against the families of those killed in the  Manchester bombings and equally offensive videos about other terrorist killings.
He has made many videos about Madeleine`s disappearance and is held in high regard by many sceptics who refer to his theories.
Would you dismiss the views of anyone who quotes his theories?
 Sorry, I'm going to be busy but may rejoin the debate later.

[Brietta]

Precisely. Amaral has been relentlessly attacked for over thirteen years too. Wolters has less evidence to support his accusations than Amaral had, but he's lauded and believed. That's hypocritical imo.

Amaral had NO evidence to support any of his hare brained theories.  Can you name just one piece of what he claimed as evidence in justification for making the McCanns arguios that stood up to professional scrutiny in the cold light of day?

You do not have a clue what evidence Wolters has to inform his opinion; I think it would be a good idea for you to wait and see just where the evidence he has to hand may take him.

Is it Wolters some think the press is 'running' scared from?

[jassi]

He possibly does but I couldn't really say
.... one way or another.
He makes dreadful accusations against the families of those killed in the  Manchester bombings and equally offensive videos about other terrorist killings.
He has made many videos about Madeleine`s disappearance and is held in high regard by many sceptics who refer to his theories.
Would you dismiss the views of anyone who quotes his theories?
 Sorry, I'm going to be busy but may rejoin the debate later.

Is that a fact ?
On what do you base that assumption ?

[barrier]

Canaan is a man convicted of sexual offences and murder and currently I believe a long term guest of Her Majesty.

Do you suggest the police should have ignored evidence which in their opinion might have connected him to another murder?

Quite the opposite.
As barrier has indicated, UK Police questioned this man while in prison, in contrast to Wolters, who appears not to have questioned Brueckner.

Like wot Jassi said innit,along with the fact Wolters is sure he's your man.

[Brietta]

I must admit I've read none of Matthew James views or opinions,  so you may be correct in naming  him a charlatan.
Do you think him to be as well known as Richard D Hall who has many fans and followers.
Would you  label him as a charlatan  and not take seriously anyone who shares his views .

I can come up with many labels which I think categorise Richard Hall.

From what I have seen of Matthew James blog, I think that at the least he is good hearted and a wonderful photographer who has a bit of a following in his niche.
I do not know enough about him to categorically label him a charlatan.

[Brietta]

I think its more you have to get it off your chest with your constant criticism of GA it was wrong but that should be that, he is no different IMO to police as a whole. IMO

It's only similar to the torture/greif the famlys of Hillsborough went through because of all the lies from  David Duckenfield, as a South Yorkshire police chief superintendent

He also admitted at the inquests that even as the event was descending into horror and death, he had infamously lied, telling Graham Kelly, then secretary of the Football Association, that Liverpool fans were to blame,

The tabloids were running stories everyday on CB month in month out, it could be quite possible in my opinion that they could have had the German equivalent to Carter Ruck on there back... for them to be so qiet

Possibly Carter Ruck might have offices in Germany but I don't think your analysis of the situation is correct.

Please can you tell me who and what you think may be 'scaring' the tabloids?

[kizzy]

I can come up with many labels which I think categorise Richard Hall.

From what I have seen of Matthew James blog, I think that at the least he is good hearted and a wonderful photographer who has a bit of a following in his niche.
I do not know enough about him to categorically label him a charlatan.

I can come up with many labels which I think categorise Richard Hall.

RDH GA say Maddie is dead. etc etc....yet HCW is saying maddie is dead ...yet that is ok.

Well, it seems obvious in my opinion that would go for anyone who does not agree with the abduction. or the mccs version if what happened ...you may even end up HCW to your list of it turns out he has no proof Maddie is dead. imo it just seems a bit like double standards to me B imo.