Are The Tabloids Running Scared?

[jassi]

Are we to assume these pictures are taken by Brueckner, or is someone else behind the camera ?

[barrier]

Bloody Hell.

I hope so,its my preferred destination,met too many goody two shoes to want to meet them again.

[Anthro]

From yesterday’s Der Spiegel (the rest of the article is behind the paywall).  Doesn’t seem like they are running very scared of anything (warning comtains graphic content

Braunschweig, June 2013. Anja K. and her daughter visit a man whom she met through the Chat2000 internet portal. Christian B. lives with two dogs in the back room of a run-down kiosk in Braunschweig. Much did not go with him, only once they physically got closer, Anja K. will later tell the police. You got to know him as a child and animal lover.

DISPLAY

When she is back home that evening, she sends him a text message: "We arrived safely, it was nice again, the time with you is good for me! You are also someone special to me. I am happy to know you . "

For the daughter, four years old, the visit was a nightmare. When the police searched the kiosk next summer, they discovered a digital camera. In addition to hundreds of pictures and videos with child pornography, photos of that visit are also stored on the SD card. One shows the daughter with her legs spread in a meadow, B. has pushed her underpants to one side and is touching the girl's vagina. Another shows the girl climbing a tree, while B. is holding his erect penis in the picture.

Thanks for sharing, VS. This information is next level re. Brückner, Seyferth, Bushing and someone called Robert M.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8439393/Christian-Brueckners-friend-convicted-sexually-abusing-eight-year-old-girl.html

[Brietta]

I hope so,its my preferred destination,met too many goody two shoes to want to meet them again.

Well the German tabloids don't appear to have any qualms about letting people know what kind of individual Brueckner is.

Or will it be alleged that he is being scapegoated for this horrific abuse (for which I believe he has been convicted), because he certainly is has been convicted of abusing one girlfriend's little girl. 

He may or he may not have had a part in Madeleine's abduction but is it worth anyone taking the risk by word or by deed of condoning or aiding and abetting such a creature.

[Admin]

Well the German tabloids don't appear to have any qualms about letting people know what kind of individual Brueckner is.

Or will it be alleged that he is being scapegoated for this horrific abuse (for which I believe he has been convicted), because he certainly is has been convicted of abusing one girlfriend's little girl. 

He may or he may not have had a part in Madeleine's abduction but is it worth anyone taking the risk by word or by deed of condoning or aiding and abetting such a creature.

He is a vile creature by any standard but is there anything at all connecting him to Madeleine?

[sadie]

Matthew James has said so and he also confirmed contact with Madeleine’s family. His blog is no longer available, though.

Matt James writings are not easy IMO to go through despite an index on the RH Side of many of his pages.  I have no intention of spending maybe hours going through everything, but I can assure you that he reported that SY had been in touch with him.

I would hope that by now you would realise that I have integrity, and accept my word, but it is up to you.

Seems that Anthro, who has total integrity IMO, has also seen that SY have been in touch.  If you don't believe us, why don't you email or phone Matt James and ask?

[Vertigo Swirl]

He is a vile creature by any standard but is there anything at all connecting him to Madeleine?

The German police seem to think so, but I expect they’re just mad, or rubbish at their jobs, or acting on the orders of the UK government.

[Brietta]

He is a vile creature by any standard but is there anything at all connecting him to Madeleine?

That's for the police to find out and I think they're working hard to do that.  But he certainly fits the profile for one of the options for what happened to Madeleine.

[Mr Gray]

He is a vile creature by any standard but is there anything at all connecting him to Madeleine?

According to HCW enough evidence to show he killed MM

[Mr Gray]

In my opinion anyone who claims psychic powers is a charlatan as I don't believe in such things. I have already said I don't know much about Richard D Hall, but I assume he's offering his opinions, based on the evidence available, unlike people like James who claim to be able to 'see' things.

As I've said before, I'm a sceptical person, but I'm not a member of the wider 'sceptic' group which, imo, exists only in the imaginations of those who support the McCanns. 

If someone quoted Richard D Hall I would look at the evidence he is using and react accordingly. I may or may not agree with what he says.

Unfortunately for you ...you cannot dictate how others see you and others see you as part of the sceptic group.

Im a sceptical person too and I'm more of a supporter of justice than simply a supporter of the McCanns

[barrier]

Well the German tabloids don't appear to have any qualms about letting people know what kind of individual Brueckner is.

Or will it be alleged that he is being scapegoated for this horrific abuse (for which I believe he has been convicted), because he certainly is has been convicted of abusing one girlfriend's little girl. 

He may or he may not have had a part in Madeleine's abduction but is it worth anyone taking the risk by word or by deed of condoning or aiding and abetting such a creature.

Is it worth taking the risk of going after a wrong un when the real perpetrator roams free?

[Mr Gray]

Is it worth taking the risk of going after a wrong un when the real perpetrator roams free?

According to HCW he has enough evidence to show CB is the perp

[Robittybob1]

According to HCW he has enough evidence to show CB is the perp

When he presents that evidence then we'll decide whether he is right.  Till then he could just be bluffing.

[Mr Gray]

When he presents that evidence then we'll decide whether he is right.  Till then he could just be bluffing.

We wont decide anything of any importance...the courts will. To suggest hes bluffing in a country with such strict privacy laws is ridiculous imo.

In this case Cb has every right to sue for libel if he feels  this isnt true. His very vocal lawyer has not suggested he will...I wonder why

[jassi]

When he presents that evidence then we'll decide whether he is right.  Till then he could just be bluffing.

Correct. Until Brueckner is charged, tabloid gossip is all rather irrelevant.