Author Topic: Michael Tatschl  (Read 48168 times)

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #165 on: November 19, 2020, 07:13:50 AM »
Why use the term frame, if latest press reports are a bellwether imo the BKA have been sold a pup, one report suggest they acted upon less than solid Intel to under go a search of property,whether this Intel came from the guy in relation to the thread title is another matter.
Have you not been following the discussion on this thread, immediately prior to my comment?  Apparently The Germans incentivised A witness to lie by offering to turn a blind eye to his own crimes.  Sounds like they are determined to pin it on CB no matter what.  The question I posed is why?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #166 on: November 19, 2020, 08:02:36 AM »
Have you not been following the discussion on this thread, immediately prior to my comment?  Apparently The Germans incentivised A witness to lie by offering to turn a blind eye to his own crimes.  Sounds like they are determined to pin it on CB no matter what.  The question I posed is why?

All he has said publicly is he thinks CB is guilty. If he was dishonest he could claim CB had confessed to him

Offline Eleanor

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #167 on: November 19, 2020, 09:00:24 AM »
Theoretically, this is possible.   If you recall right from the beginning I enquired if it was possible to discuss "Michael Tatschl"  and we were warned not to venture into libel.

We mustn't say this is a fact.   We can't even have an opinion that " Tatschl gives the police ‘information’ and in return they make evidence of wrongdoing disappear."  Both would be libelous unless the idea was discussed as a theoretical possibility.

I'm afraid all the work I've done to present this thread will be lost if we develop this theory any further.

The use of some question marks might help?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #168 on: November 19, 2020, 10:14:17 AM »
All he has said publicly is he thinks CB is guilty. If he was dishonest he could claim CB had confessed to him
And say nothing for 13 years?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #169 on: November 19, 2020, 10:40:12 AM »
And say nothing for 13 years?

He's explained why...he wasn't aware of CBs interest in children until later and it was the Netflix doc that made him think CB was involved. I think you are barking....up the wrong tree

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #170 on: November 19, 2020, 10:48:42 AM »
He's explained why...he wasn't aware of CBs interest in children until later and it was the Netflix doc that made him think CB was involved. I think you are barking....up the wrong tree

You say "he wasn't aware of CBs interest in children until later", so help me understand when that knowledge came to Michael Tatschl?

I could imagine they might have shared the photos that CB is said to have had.  That is an interesting theoretical possibility.  Does Tatschl admit to seeing CB's photo collection?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #171 on: November 19, 2020, 10:53:25 AM »
You say "he wasn't aware of CBs interest in children until later", so help me understand when that knowledge came to Michael Tatschl?

I could imagine they might have shared the photos that CB is said to have had.  That is an interesting theoretical possibility.  Does Tatschl admit to seeing CB's photo collection?
Your whole theory is based on speculation and nothing more..I'm not interested in exploring any of it

Offline Brietta

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #172 on: November 19, 2020, 11:05:45 AM »
He's explained why...he wasn't aware of CBs interest in children until later and it was the Netflix doc that made him think CB was involved. I think you are barking....up the wrong tree
I think you are spot on in that post, Davel.

I doubt very much that Brueckner's friends and acquaintances had the slightest inkling of just how perverse his interests actually were ~ even those who were criminals themselves.
I think anyone who had close contact with Brueckner would be anxious to put a lot of distance between themselves and him as the implications of knowing him sank in when he was publicly unmasked.

I would be very surprised if Tatschl hasn't already been checked out by the police ~ that is their job after all ~ and I don't think it is for us to second guess them.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #173 on: November 19, 2020, 11:22:02 AM »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #174 on: November 19, 2020, 01:37:38 PM »
And say nothing for 13 years?
CB need not have confessed 13 years ago, he could have confessed to him 13 months ago and it would still have made a compelling story .
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #175 on: November 19, 2020, 01:43:44 PM »
CB need not have confessed 13 years ago, he could have confessed to him 13 months ago and it would still have made a compelling story .

I believe it was Brueckner's reaction to the McCann tenth anniversary German TV broadcast which caused some people to flag him up to the German police in the first instance.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #176 on: November 19, 2020, 02:11:29 PM »
I believe it was Brueckner's reaction to the McCann tenth anniversary German TV broadcast which caused some people to flag him up to the German police in the first instance.
Davel was suggesting that if Michael Tatschi was making it all up in order to have his own crimes overlooked that he could have gone the whole hog and told the police that CB confessed to him but he didn't.  All he has done is offer a view of the man, and for this he is being smeared as a liar on this thread.  Par for the course, as his negative views are not about the McCanns.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline misty

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #177 on: November 19, 2020, 02:21:54 PM »
One has to wonder why Tatschl paid such close attention to the Netflix documentary in the first place. He had reportedly already left Portugal by the time Madeleine disappeared & was not spoken to by police until after the documentary aired in 2019. Rather like Brueckner, he appears to have had an exceptional interest in what happened to a little English girl IMO.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/21/interviewchristian-bruckner-best-friend-sure-took-madeleine/
*snipped*
"The part where the female tourist talked about the man turning up at her door while her child played by the front door, the creepy guy with acne and blonde hair. I just knew it was Christian for sure.”

Days later, police arrived at Tatschl’s front door.

“I had two Austrian police and two German Police turn up at my house. I was then taken to the police station where I told them my story over 14 hours.

"It was the first week of April last year and they had me in the police station from 10am to 6pm on the first day and then from 10 am until 4pm the next day.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #178 on: November 19, 2020, 04:11:55 PM »
Your whole theory is based on speculation and nothing more..I'm not interested in exploring any of it
It was you who wrote "he wasn't aware of CB's interest in children until later", not me.  I don't have a theory about Michael Tatschl as yet, as I'm still trying to work him out.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #179 on: November 19, 2020, 04:18:09 PM »
I think you are spot on in that post, Davel.

I doubt very much that Brueckner's friends and acquaintances had the slightest inkling of just how perverse his interests actually were ~ even those who were criminals themselves.
I think anyone who had close contact with Brueckner would be anxious to put a lot of distance between themselves and him as the implications of knowing him sank in when he was publicly unmasked.

I would be very surprised if Tatschl hasn't already been checked out by the police ~ that is their job after all ~ and I don't think it is for us to second guess them.

I’m sure it wasn’t hard for Taschi to be checked out by the police. He was a career criminal after all.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?