Will 2021 Bring About A Resolution?

[Eleanor]

Instead of proclaiming how wrong people are why not let events just take their course ?

They already are and have been for some time.

[jassi]

They already are and have been for some time.

Good innit?

[Vertigo Swirl]

'Real' evidence is a concept invented by Davel, imo, so it means nothing to me. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion, because evident things are undoubted. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence)

So evidence, it seems, needs to be something which is evident. Evident means easily seen or understood.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/evident

The evidence given by the holiday group is not easy to see or understand, so cannot be described as undoubted. People disagree with each other, with the group statement they prepared, and, in some cases, with their own statements. Their evidence is also disagreed with by other people's statements.

So it would seem you prefer the word "undoubted" to the word "real" when applied to evidence.  I see.  So what undoubted evidence is there to suggest McCann involvement then?

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's only possible to move on when unanswered questions are answered.

Whose unanswered questions?  Yours? 

[Eleanor]

Good innit?

You could say that. 

But I am beginning to suspect that you are stalking me.  Although please don't worry about it because it keeps The Forum going.

[jassi]

You could say that. 

But I am beginning to suspect that you are stalking me.  Although please don't worry about it because it keeps The Forum going.

Not really, but you are one of the relatively sensible ones on the 'other' side 

[G-Unit]

What unanswered questions?

All the ones arising from the statements.

[Eleanor]

Not really, but you are one of the relatively sensible ones on the 'other' side 

Wow.  Thank you.  That is kind.  But then there are always more ways than one to see.

[Eleanor]

All the ones arising from the statements.

I suggest you lay them out.  Paying attention to Libel of course.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wow.  Thank you.  That is kind.  But then there are always more ways than one to see.

You thought that comment was kind?  I thought it was rude personally. 

[Eleanor]

You thought that comment was kind?  I thought it was rude personally.

Yes I did think it was kind, in so far as able, sides permitting.

We all have to cope on our own on this Forum.  I prefer to make it as easy as possible.

[jassi]

Well exactly. One of my resolutions this year was to avoid meaningless dialogue with confrontational posters.
Worked fine so far   

[Mr Gray]

All the ones arising from the statements.

I think its fair to conclude the statements will contain mistakes due to translation. The mccanns provided new ones...it may well be all those questions you have have been answerred.  If there are doubts about the accuracy of the statements they dont qualify as being evident

[Eleanor]

Well exactly. One of my resolutions this year was to avoid meaningless dialogue with confrontational posters.
Worked fine so far   

Yes.  At least we do seem to have a conversation of some kind.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes I did think it was kind, in so far as able, sides permitting.

We all have to cope on our own on this Forum.  I prefer to make it as easy as possible.

If you enjoy being damned with faint praise whilst the sensibleness of the rest of "your side" is called into question then I suppose it was just fine.