I'm getting reports that Madeleine is alive.

[sadie]

Read the post again I said evidence... What evidence do you have to suggest this is Maddie.  It looks like the answer is none.

This is "put it on the back burner" stuff imo.   But like you, Dave, and despite the many similarities, I am almost sure that this is not Madeleine.  The height of the upper lip (cupids bow to underside of nostrils) confirms this.  Also Madeleines eyes are more widely spaced.    I can understand many people thinking that it is Madeleine though Rob.

I am inclined to think that Madeleines beauty will have a characterful look about it.  She has had a very lively personality with varied facial expressions.

I cannot agree with you that Madeleine is dead.   No proof of that whatsoever.

[Mr Gray]

This is "put it on the back burner" stuff imo.   But like you, Dave, and despite the many similarities, I am almost sure that this is not Madeleine.  The height of the upper lip (cupids bow to underside of nostrils) confirms this.  Also Madeleines eyes are more widely spaced.    I can understand many people thinking that it is Madeleine though Rob.

I am inclined to think that Madeleines beauty will have a characterful look about it.  She has had a very lively personality with varied facial expressions.

I cannot agree with you that Madeleine is dead.   No proof of that whatsoever.

There's evidence Maddie is dead... No one mentioned proof.

[Mr Gray]

This is "put it on the back burner" stuff imo.   But like you, Dave, and despite the many similarities, I am almost sure that this is not Madeleine.  The height of the upper lip (cupids bow to underside of nostrils) confirms this.  Also Madeleines eyes are more widely spaced.    I can understand many people thinking that it is Madeleine though Rob.

I am inclined to think that Madeleines beauty will have a characterful look about it.  She has had a very lively personality with varied facial expressions.

I cannot agree with you that Madeleine is dead.   No proof of that whatsoever.

I think this is put in the burner stuff.  Rob is no detective because he does not investigate he simply believes what pleases him.
He should have done some research into his informant and he would have found out he is a complete crackpot.
Fischer believes the abduction was staged to cover up an investigation  into the abduction of a vip uk diplomat.  He  believes  the blood in the apartment  vame from a fight between Gerry and the abductor.  He believes the Russians killed Lady Di and it's all connected.  He can't reveal anymore as it could start WW3.

If that's the sort of crackpot Rob believes you are welcome to support him

[sadie]

I think this is put in the burner stuff.  Rob is no detective because he does not investigate he simply believes what pleades him.
He should have done some research into his informant and he would have found out he is a complete crackpot.
Fischer believes the abduction was staged to covrt up an investigation  into a vip uk diplomat.  He  believes  the blood in the apartment  vame from a fight between Gerry and the abfuctor.  He believes the Ruddians killed Lady Di and it's all connected.  He can't reveal anymore as it could start WW3.

If that's the sort of crackpot Rob believes you are welcome to support him

I support you both, Davel, we are on the same side.  But I flinch from you aggressive attitude towards Rob and also, at times, towards me.

It isn't necessary  and it shouldn't happen IMO.


I truly worry about you and the accusations you make against Brueckner.  You can't KNOW if HCW is correct about CB killing Madeleine.    Furthermore you must be upsetting The Mccanns who are holding onto the faith that Madeleine is still alive.  Maybe they have seen my video?


Tbqh, your faith in HCW reminds me of the blind faith that the so called Skeptics have towards Amaral

We can still argue about points, but we are on the same side, Rob too.  Let's work together, shall we?   

[faithlilly]

I support you both, Davel, we are on the same side.  But I flinch from you aggressive attitude towards Rob and also, at times, towards me.

It isn't necessary  and it shouldn't happen IMO.


I truly worry about you and the accusations you make against Brueckner.  You can't KNOW if HCW is correct about CB killing Madeleine.    Furthermore you must be upsetting The Mccanns who are holding onto the faith that Madeleine is still alive.  Maybe they have seen my video?


Tbqh, your faith in HCW reminds me of the blind faith that the so called Skeptics have towards Amaral

We can still argue about points, but we are on the same side, Rob too.  Let's work together, shall we?

Yes Davel...group hug (((()))))

[Robittybob1]

There's evidence Maddie is dead... No one mentioned proof.

Have you seen that evidence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes Davel...group hug (((()))))

She sneered, sneerily.

[Mr Gray]

I support you both, Davel, we are on the same side.  But I flinch from you aggressive attitude towards Rob and also, at times, towards me.

It isn't necessary  and it shouldn't happen IMO.


I truly worry about you and the accusations you make against Brueckner.  You can't KNOW if HCW is correct about CB killing Madeleine.    Furthermore you must be upsetting The Mccanns who are holding onto the faith that Madeleine is still alive.  Maybe they have seen my video?


Tbqh, your faith in HCW reminds me of the blind faith that the so called Skeptics have towards Amaral

We can still argue about points, but we are on the same side, Rob too.  Let's work together, shall we?

I find your post misguided and offensive.  You have several times referred to my supposed blind faith in Wolters.  You could not be further from the truth and the fact you cannot see that is bizarre to me.
I've outliined several times why I think Wolters does have this evidence and it's got nothing to do with blind faith.  I also think you are wrong about the McCanns who I'm sure, realise Maddie is probably dead... Its the only sensible option... Not definite but by far the most likely.
As regards blind faith I see that in rob and yourself who are prepared to take seriously  the rubbish rob is posting. I think it's ridiculous  you have more faith in robs latest thread yet dismiss Wolters.

I'm not working with anyone to solve the case... We simply dont have enough information.
Rather than criticise me you might want to look at how insulting rob has been to me over the past two years... Then you accuse me of being suckered for some reasons.
You and rob have blind faith in sceptics yet there is no record of them solving... Or helping to solve any case ever

I'm going to stick with the evidence and at the moment  that points to murder...

[Mr Gray]

Have you seen that evidence?

I don't need to see it... It comes from a reliable source unlike the sort of stuff you post

[Angelo222]

I support you both, Davel, we are on the same side.  But I flinch from you aggressive attitude towards Rob and also, at times, towards me.

It isn't necessary  and it shouldn't happen IMO.


I truly worry about you and the accusations you make against Brueckner.  You can't KNOW if HCW is correct about CB killing Madeleine.    Furthermore you must be upsetting The Mccanns who are holding onto the faith that Madeleine is still alive.  Maybe they have seen my video?


Tbqh, your faith in HCW reminds me of the blind faith that the so called Skeptics have towards Amaral

We can still argue about points, but we are on the same side, Rob too.  Let's work together, shall we?

Best post I've ever read from Sadie. So matter-of-fact.

[Mr Gray]

Best post I've ever read from Sadie. So matter-of-fact.

Thanks Angelo... Hopefully  Sadie will now realise how divisive she is being

[Mr Gray]

This is "put it on the back burner" stuff imo.   But like you, Dave, and despite the many similarities, I am almost sure that this is not Madeleine.  The height of the upper lip (cupids bow to underside of nostrils) confirms this.  Also Madeleines eyes are more widely spaced.    I can understand many people thinking that it is Madeleine though Rob.

I am inclined to think that Madeleines beauty will have a characterful look about it.  She has had a very lively personality with varied facial expressions.

I cannot agree with you that Madeleine is dead.   No proof of that whatsoever.

I'm not saying Madeleine  is dead... I'm saying she is most probably  dead

[Robittybob1]

I'm not saying Madeleine is dead... I'm saying she is most probably  dead

The chances of wining Lotto are virtually zero too, but someone wins now and then.   If a winner turns up they aren't just dismissed by someone saying "you most probably didn't win".

OK in this thread the most unlikely girl has been nominated as possibly being Madeleine.  About as unlikely as winning the Lotto even in my books.
But since she is nameless, of no known abode, the right age, size and colour we can't quite say "no" as it is possible to change eye colour and hide a coloboma defect behind contact lenses.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The chances of wing Lotto are virtually zero too, but someone wins now and then.   If a winner turns up they aren't just dismissed by someone saying "you most probably didn't win".

OK in this thread the most unlikely girl has been nominated as possibly being Madeleine.  About as unlikely as winning the Lotto even in my books.
But since she is nameless, of no known abode, the right age, size and colour we can't quite say "no" as it is possible to change eye colour and hide a coloboma defect behind contact lenses.

Unless there is some other reason for thinking this is Madeleine its not worthy of discussion is it, or should we look at every anonymous picture of a teenage white girl on the internet and compare her features to Madeleine? 

[Robittybob1]

Unless there is some other reason for thinking this is Madeleine its not worthy of discussion is it, or should we look at every anonymous picture of a teenage white girl on the internet and compare her features to Madeleine?

When did you stop looking for Madeleine McCann?