"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Straight from the transcripts - Luke's brother and the computer
…https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/websites-and-porn.html…
11:33 PM · Nov 10, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1723121826262360136

This is like reading a book where all the pages have been ripped out, 95% of the pages are missing and the remaining pages have had some of the writing on the pages blanked out

[Nicholas]

”Shane discusses the websites accessed - directly from the transcripts”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/websites-and-porn.html?m=1

June 26th, 2019 - Jeremy Bamber Forum
Sandra Lean
And, before the inevitable comments about him "admitting" that he was masturbating, he didn't. I have the court transcripts - it was put to him that he might have been "doing something else" whilst looking at the images ... Shane agreed that he "may have been" - that's it. We now, know, of course, that the "pornographic images" were almost certainly pop-ups, on screen for a few seconds, so he wasn't "watching porn" as has been claimed for all these years".

 

Scammer Sandra Lean - page 369 of her 2nd innocence fraud book

“The officer introduced “evidence” he said the police had obtained about Shane’s use of the internet that evening – in particular, that he had been looking at pornog- raphy (this is the same scattergun approach used in Luke’s interrogation, jumping from subject to subject to confuse and disorient the witness). Out of nowhere, this officer questioned Shane about “gay sites” which, he asserted, had been accessed during Shane’s internet usage.
Shane replied that the gay sites had come up “by accident”.
There were no gay sites”.

PC used to access internet porn on day that Jodi died - The Scotsman 10th January 2010
“The court heard that the final image which had been accessed before the internet session was ended depicted a man who had been digitally altered so his lower half was that of a naked female
https://www.scotsman.com/news/pc-used-to-access-internet-porn-on-day-that-jodi-died-2509716

[Nicholas]

Excerpts from con-artist Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke (p.104)

”More than a year after the guilty verdict, as the defence team were preparing to appeal, the existence of unidentified DNA was once again raised”

2006 - the year warped minded fantasist Scott Forbes went to Scot Caravan’s and met with liar Corinne Mitchell

“Eventually documents were released which clarified the situation - in spite of police claims during the initial investigation that there had been no DNA at the scene which had been unaccounted for, it now emerged that there had always been one DNA sample that remained unidentified.

Just prior to this book going to press, further witness statements, pointing to another, far more credible suspect were passed to the defence. The police claimed that these statements had not been followed up because the case was “closed”. [/i]

Scammer Sandra Lean from her 1st Innocence Fraud book “No Smoke”

[Kenmair]

Lean still hasn't announced the Dalkeith venue for her convicted killer fundraiser on the 9th. It's almost as though the tide is going out instead of turning.

[Nicholas]

Corrine Mitchell
“When I got home I went directly to the kitchen where I was confronted by Luke brandishing the broccoli! He asked if it should be that colour (it was turning yellowy) and I said no......bin the broccoli! He decided on beans instead...as it was a Monday and I do my weekly shop on a Tuesday there wasn't any other fresh vegetables left.

Both Luke and I served up. I told Luke to shout Shane down as he was upstairs. Shane came down, complained to Luke he had burnt the pie, I told him it could be scraped off, it wasn't that bad. Shane returned upstairs armed with his dinner. Luke ate his in front of the TV and I decided to have mine on the patio as I had been cooped up in my office all day and not seen any sun.

After eating dinner I was preparing to do the dishes when Luke came into the kitchen and said that that was him off. I joked with him and said.....don't tell me ...your seeing Jodi....as by this time Jodi had become more favourable than the cadets. I also suggested to him that he introduced his clothes to the washing machine as he had worn them for a couple of days. I got the usual teenage response......Och mum!.....and "this is Jodi’s favourite t-shirt" I replied it wouldn't be much longer if it didn't get washed and with that I got another "Och".....I'm off, see you later!

Shane came and went most of the evening, which I found quite irritating! I had stopped smoking, due to pressure from Shane, and had discovered that tracking and smoking don't go as it involves a lot of running, but by this time I was having the odd sneaky one due to pressure at work. This is our busiest time. Every time I went to "light up" Shane appeared and nearly caught me. Then just as I was safe in the knowledge that Shane was engrossed in his computer......Lit up fag.......Luke comes in.......I never got a sneaky cig that night. The rest is on the time~line. Hope this helps.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg22813.html#msg22813

Yet Corinne Mitchell was caught on CCTV in Morning Noon and Night at around 5:07pm buying cigarette’s and alcohol

[Nicholas]

Claiming killer innocent part of search for truth - The Scotsman - May 2007

‘With piles of legal papers, transcripts, notes and scribbled questions in her arms, she sat down to look into convicted killer Luke Mitchell's face - and was troubled by what saw.

"I thought: 'Oh, he's just a bairn, he's just a laddie'," she recalls. "He looked so much younger, people have forgotten how young. But he is a strong lad with a brilliant sense of humour. One who still believes this is just one huge cock-up, that it's just a matter of time before it gets sorted out.

"He believes they will get to the truth and that will be it. It'll be sorted - and he will be out."

The notion that the now 18-year-old Luke Mitchell - convicted of brutally slaying girlfriend Jodi Jones in a vicious attack which shocked Scotland - could be released following an appeal hearing at the end of the summer might well send a tremor through the tightly-knit communities around Dalkeith. Areas like Easthouses, Newbattle and Mayfield were plunged into deep shock four years ago when the 14-year-old's mutilated body was found beside a woodland path.

But the idea that he may be helped on his way to freedom by a local mother of two teenage girls who, fearful for her own children's safety set out in an attempt to prove his guilt only to discover that he may, after all, be innocent, has enraged some.

For Sandra, a 43-year-old psychology and sociology graduate whose home is just a five-minute drive from the wooded lane where Jodi met her death, has been one of the very few to suggest the unthinkable: that Luke Mitchell just might be innocent.

It's a suggestion that has certainly sparked high emotions. "Yes, there has been a bit of intimidation since I started this," nods Sandra, reflecting on four years spent trying to fathom out who really has Jodi Jones' blood on their hands. "I've been followed around, intimidated. It's not been very pleasant, and you'd have to be stupid not to feel uncomfortable about that. But as a mother, I'd rather know they have the right person behind bars."

In her hands, she holds the book she has finally just seen published. No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice highlights seven high-profile criminal convictions - including Mitchell's - each of them she firmly believes to be a gross miscarriage of justice. It includes cases like that of Sion Jenkins - the stepfather of Billie-Jo Jenkins who has finally been cleared of her murder - and Gordon Park, whose wife Carol Ann Park's body was found in the Lake District 30 years after she went missing.

But it is Mitchell's conviction and the court case that held Scotland gripped by the details of his oddball existence, drugs, two-timing and alleged obsession with the occult - that may incur the displeasure of her local community.

"The public opinion was so much against Luke Mitchell and the Mitchell family that to start speaking in support and start questioning things has been risky," admits Sandra.

"I was in a shop recently, talking to someone I know when another woman came in. The person I was speaking to mentioned that I'd been looking at the Luke Mitchell case, and this other woman - you know the kind, knuckles scrapping on the floor - turned and growled something like: 'Well, you'd just better watch yourself'."

There have been other, even more worrying incidents which Sandra prefers not to discuss publicly. Yet she is so driven to lift the lid on what she sees as fundamental flaws in the justice system which have sent Mitchell to jail for 20 years, that she's prepared to take the flak: "I'll just not shop in that shop for a while," she shrugs.

While the police still insist the case is closed, her personal conclusion is that Jodi's killer could not have been the then 14-year-old Mitchell and that the legal case around the St David's High School pupil was based on circumstantial evidence, and the investigation botched.

But to establish the facts of the case it meant carrying out her own investigation of the case - interviewing key people, tracing and timing the route Mitchell was alleged to have taken and scanning hundreds of pages of evidence, statements and transcripts.

She even walked, then ran the path, crawled through rough land beyond the wall where Jodi died and attempted to figure out how Mitchell could have committed the crime in the time it was suggested, only to find it wasn't possible. She did it not to upset Jodi's family, but to ensure the police had the right man.

"I can't imagine what Jodi's family have been through. And for them to have to face the possibility that it wasn't Luke who did this - how betrayed will they feel? How devastating for them.

"But my girls used a path to walk to Newbattle High School - not the path where Jodi died, but one not unlike it. I wanted to know that they were safe," she explains. "The more I looked, the more pieces didn't fit."

There are several areas which set her alarms bells ringing: the lack of DNA evidence and the question mark over eyewitness sightings of Mitchell near the scene; the fact Jodi's body had been left, uncovered on a rainy night before forensic officers arrived and the presence of two young men on a moped near the scene who were both quickly eliminated from the enquiry.

Soon Mitchell was being portrayed as an oddball who played with knives, smoked dope to excess and penned essays praising Satan - quickly emerging as the chief suspect. "It was as if someone had decided it was Luke that did it, and that was it," claims Sandra.

The root of the issue, she argues, is a justice system which encourages collusion between the Crown Prosecution Service and the police - a system aimed at gluing together evidence with a prosecution case but which some believe prompts investigators and lawyers to establish the story of the incident and then make the facts fit.

"I wrote this because I was so bloody angry," she explains. "We were all trotting along thinking things were one way when they are not. I wanted to raise awareness and get change. I want people to get as mad as a box of frogs too, to say they don't want innocent people locked up and I want to be sure that we are safe.

"Don't give us this bull that we have locked up someone and that's it. I want to know that the person they have is the right person so when I go to the shop for a bottle of wine or a loaf of bread he isn't going jump out at me.

"Everyone says you are safe, he is off the streets. But in so many cases I've looked at the person that did it is still free and it could be anyone, it could be the person across the street or over the fence. It might be your or your friends' kids who are in the wrong place at the wrong time."

Her inquiries took her to Mitchell's mother, Corinne, and eventually to Polmont Young Offenders Institute, where the teenager remains behind bars.

She had already met Luke before his conviction, but seeing him locked up brought home to her once more the enormity of his case. "He is just a laddie sitting there. He absolutely, categorically says he did not do it and I have never seen anything in him to suggest he did. Not a smidgeon of doubt that he is innocent.

"He is your normal, antsy, in-your-face teenager. Did he do it? I believe there were a couple of other people with more ability and opportunity, with more evidence pointing in that direction than in Luke's.

"To me, it's clear they have the wrong guy."

• No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice, by Sandra Lean

https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/claiming-killer-innocent-part-search-truth-2453025

You’ve never cared about the Jones family Sandra Lean!

Just like you haven’t cared about the people you have betrayed with your bare faced lies!

Why did you choose to write and publish a second innocence fraud book before having read all the trial transcripts Sandra Lean?

The lawyers involved with the TV show murder in a small town would not have read all the trial transcripts either

What were the lawyers names again who were alleged to have “facts checked” the case?

Legal and business affairs: David McKie, Mauny Wright & Cassie Mensah

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lawyer-of-the-week-david-mckie-solicitor-who-defended-alex-salmond-in-sex-claims-case-t272kx96f

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean at approx 47:03 during the above video

“There is this ridiculous claim that it’s undermining justice - okay so not answering questions that really need answered and not releasing the information that would give the full picture isn’t undermining public confidence”

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

At approx 50:47 during the above video scammer Sandra Lean reads a comment from Ana

Ana:
It’s funny when people call us amateur detectives ignoring the fact that a jury are just members of the public and in this case not even given the full facts and furthermore ignoring the opinions of professionals

 

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean at approx 51:46 during the above video

Lou:
None of it fits or makes sense never mind beyond a reasonable doubt, it’s madness, they all know it and that’s why they have tried to ignore it and won’t release info

Scammer Sandra Lean:
Yeah, Erm It doesn’t make sense eh eh I guess it was never meant to make sense, it, it was cobbled together as a compelling narrative that wasn’t ever really supposed to be picked apart in this way

 

[Nicholas]

Nicole Stevenson on Facebook
“Ow fuk off Judy”

 

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean stated at around 54:57 (7th November 2022)

“Erm I would like to come back fairly regularly, when there are updates like this that I can share with ya, erm I don’t think I’ll be doing weekly again, in part because that was designed to be for Luke’s case and once again mainstream media, I am not here as a representative of Luke’s case, I’m not here in any professional capacity, just me talking about justice matters

Another bust up 👆🏽

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean refers to a question asked by Derek at around 56:05 in the above video

Derek:
I wonder if the jury feel as duped as other members of the public that have changed their views when presented with the hard facts

 

Scammer Sandra Lean:
That, that must be very very difficult for any of them who do, because, while we have, while we have, I suppose the liberty to change our mind and to say you know ‘I had that lad guilty for so long’ we don’t have the responsibility of having put him where’s he’s been for the last 17 years and I think for, for jurors that must be one helluva burden, to, to have been on that jury, maybe to have gone with a guilty verdict to now be going ‘I don’t know if that was the right way to go’. It must be awful for them and I think again we, we need to look at the damage that these sorts of cases do to jurors as well because they’ve got to live with the result of what they did on the basis of what they thought was the truth. To find out years later that it wasn’t the truth, or it wasn’t all of the truth, or a lot of it was just made up rubbish

 

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Towards the end of the above video

Scammer Sandra Lean:

Right, thank all so much for being here, Erm I was a little bit nervous about doing this today, but you’ve been lovely and you’ve made it, you’ve made it a real pleasure once again, so erm I’m gonna head off and I will be back soon, eh not quite sure when but I will post when I’m coming back again 

 

"Oh! What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive"

[Nicholas]

Got to love a little bit of Jen!

Or on Mr Mathews around the Sky interview!

 

Jen has been listening to the bs pushed out by that fraudster Bob Ruff and his “researchers” 🙄

Jen Gale: 3w
Elections next year and we'll do what we can.  I remember thinking the case was odd at the time but I assumed he must have been convicted on solid evidence, I believed the system worked.  I had no idea.

Jen Gale:
Innocence Fraud did you go to the pantomime themed, 'oh yes he did.' 'Oh no he didnt!' school of investigation? If you've information, direct quotes then by all means state your case. Otherwise...

Jen Gale:
Describing Dorothy Bain as a 'real lawyer' is interesting.
Lawyers doing their job property is as it should be, they are paid enough. The tone of your link is gutter tabloid. I don't need this to be sensationalised, I need an independent investigation before I will believe this conviction is safe. I have read every word of the article. None of it is new to me - it admits the statements change. We take a lot of trust when we challenge and the article is right on one point, when mud is slung and conspiracy theories abound, innocent people get hurt. That's why it needs an independent investigation to settle.

Jen Gale
@genthewren
·
Nov 9
I daresay one of the officers on the case had a partner who's replica scale wall business was about to fold.

 

[Nicholas]

During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

“Hi Sharon - hope you’re well”

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean stated at around 7:52

”This particular live is all about education”

 

What a charlatan you are Sandra Lean!

She goes on

“We, we need to know as individuals, and as a society, we need to see what’s done, why it’s done, how it’s done and what the outcomes are, and we need to understand that

Because as long as we are blindly relying on the system (scammer Sandra Lean) to do the right thing innocent people (are being betrayed)

 

And

“Even, Even I, after 18 years of turning the system on its head”

 

You have done no such thing Sandra Lean!

That’ll be your vanity speaking - again 🙄

You have spent the past however many years telling people bare faced lies about a dangerous, sadistic and sexually deviant psychopathic murderer! And numerous other lies about other innocent people!

And now your bare faced lies are being exposed - one by one - by your former supporters, who are beginning to see through you and your scam!