Author Topic: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?  (Read 60294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mrs S

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #75 on: March 22, 2021, 09:29:37 PM »
Of course it’s not relevant which begs the question why you brought it up in the first place. This is the internet and anyone can claim anything, without proof you’re simply one of those anyones.
It's relevance is Sandra Lean has stated he isn't on protection so she made it relevant as It's another untruth from her, tell you what when Sandra lean gives the proof he isnt on protection, I'll give the proof he is! yes I am just another nobody on the internet, but seeminly one with more info regarding that than Sandra Lean, or more probable more truthful!  Sandra lean has certainly prooved that anyone can claim anything
« Last Edit: March 22, 2021, 09:42:19 PM by Mrs S »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #76 on: March 22, 2021, 09:39:25 PM »
There was something seriously amiss with him for one reason or another which is why the suggestion was made by his school regarding an educational psychologist.

What I really cannot get my head around is the collection of bottles filled with urine in his bedroom which I find one of the most extraordinary facts I've ever encountered.

When you give it context it really does seem that strange at all. Luke was a child, yes a child, who had found his girlfriend murdered and mutilated and then was subjected to a sustained campaign of harassment from both the police and the media. If innocent can you even begin to fathom the effect this would have on his mental health? That Luke began collecting his urine in bottles is not a surprising reaction but an all too understandable one.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #77 on: March 22, 2021, 09:45:00 PM »
It's relevance is Sandra Lean has stated he isn't on protection so she made it relevant as It's another untruth from her, tell you what when Sandra lean gives the proof he isnt on protection, I'll give the proof he is! yes I am just another nobody on the internet, but seeminly one with more info regarding that than Sandra Lean, or more probable more truthful!

You had your chance Mrs S. Not really interested anymore.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #78 on: March 22, 2021, 09:47:07 PM »
OCD - presumably because he ‘hoarded’ his urine in numerous large fizzy drinks bottles?

Compulsive hoarding has been found to be twice as prevalent in men as women and research has shown that sufferers often had a family member who has OCD and/or hoarding tendencies.  Some of the common items hoarded include newspapers, leaflets and any paper items generally, such as shopping lists and receipts, or clothes and furniture but in some cases may include animals, half-eaten food, urine and faeces.  It is easy to see that one of the immediate practical issues of hoarding is that of health and safety including fire, infestations and falls.
https://www.counselling-directory.org.uk/memberarticles/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-compulsive-hoarding

You do know that it started after the murder, don’t you?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Rusty

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #79 on: March 22, 2021, 10:06:30 PM »
When you give it context it really does seem that strange at all. Luke was a child, yes a child

Luke was a teenager, not a child. A teenager that was allowed to have sex, with several girls, a teenager that was allowed to smoke and deal cannabis, a teenager that was allowed to carry knives, a teenager that was allowed to get tattoos, a teenager that was allowed out to all hours of the evening. A teenager not a child, huge difference.

Offline Mrs S

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #80 on: March 22, 2021, 10:07:15 PM »
You had your chance Mrs S. Not really interested anymore.
  That makes two of us! Perhaps Sandra should be more truthful even on the small seemingly irrelevant things. Have a nice day.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #81 on: March 22, 2021, 10:09:02 PM »
You do know that it started after the murder, don’t you?
Says who?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #82 on: March 22, 2021, 10:17:06 PM »
Luke was a teenager, not a child. A teenager that was allowed to have sex, with several girls, a teenager that was allowed to smoke and deal cannabis, a teenager that was allowed to carry knives, a teenager that was allowed to get tattoos, a teenager that was allowed out to all hours of the evening. A teenager not a child, huge difference.

child
/tʃʌɪld/
 Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: child; plural noun: children
a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

He was a child.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #83 on: March 22, 2021, 10:20:19 PM »
  That makes two of us! Perhaps Sandra should be more truthful even on the small seemingly irrelevant things. Have a nice day.

Perhaps you should cease to make claims that you are unwilling or unable to prove.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2021, 10:23:32 PM by faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #84 on: March 22, 2021, 10:21:22 PM »
child
/tʃʌɪld/
 Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: child; plural noun: children
a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

He was a child.
A very poorly brought up and disciplined one.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #85 on: March 22, 2021, 10:21:59 PM »
Luke was a teenager, not a child. A teenager that was allowed to have sex, with several girls, a teenager that was allowed to smoke and deal cannabis, a teenager that was allowed to carry knives, a teenager that was allowed to get tattoos, a teenager that was allowed out to all hours of the evening. A teenager not a child, huge difference.

Apart from the tattoos, I've met quite a few teenagers who have done all that. Sad, but true. It is not unusual.


Offline Nicholas

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #86 on: March 22, 2021, 10:27:58 PM »
You do know that it started after the murder, don’t you?

How do you know when this started?

The bottles were found on 4 July 2003 (CoA para 127) around 20 large fizzy drink size bottles apparently

I don’t think Mitchell filled these bottles over the course of approx 3 days and it’s highly possible this was something he was already doing prior to 30th June





« Last Edit: March 22, 2021, 10:30:07 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mrs S

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #87 on: March 22, 2021, 10:28:36 PM »
Perhaps you should cease to make claims that you are unwilling or unable to prove.
Perhaps Sandra should do the same! Swings and roundabouts there. Difference is I could prove my claim if I chose to. Sandra Can't!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #88 on: March 22, 2021, 10:31:27 PM »
Apart from the tattoos, I've met quite a few teenagers who have done all that. Sad, but true. It is not unusual.

I’m afraid not least of all the victim.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Rusty

Re: Why did suspicion fall upon Luke Mitchell?
« Reply #89 on: March 22, 2021, 10:35:56 PM »
Apart from the tattoos, I've met quite a few teenagers who have done all that. Sad, but true. It is not unusual.

Did the parents or parent allow these teenagers that you know to do these things?