Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 55201 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #210 on: May 01, 2021, 09:25:31 AM »
It remains to be seen whether any police force has evidence to convict another and exonerate the McCanns. Amaral explains why he retired from the PJ and wrote his book in the book's foreword. Some may disagree, but calling him a liar about his motives would, of course be libellous.
I would say based on what Wolters has said that the BKK do  have evidence that exhonerates the parents.

I believe Amaral wrote his book because he actually believed what he wrote... That to me is incompetence and nothing to do with lying
« Last Edit: May 01, 2021, 09:37:10 AM by Davel »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #211 on: May 01, 2021, 09:49:12 AM »
I would say based on what Wolters has said that the BKK do  have evidence that exhonerates the parents.

I believe Amaral wrote his book because he actually believed what he wrote... That to me is incompetence and nothing to do with lying

I would reply that I think Wolters has yet to convince everyone, although he seems to have convinced some. Obviously Amaral believed what he wrote. Whether that makes him incompetent remains to be seen, but if he did pursue the wrong suspects he won't be the first or the last policeman to do that.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #212 on: May 01, 2021, 09:53:21 AM »
It remains to be seen whether any police force has evidence to convict another and exonerate the McCanns. Amaral explains why he retired from the PJ and wrote his book in the book's foreword. Some may disagree, but calling him a liar about his motives would, of course be libellous.

No, it wouldn't be Libellous.  Amaral is a convicted perjurer.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #213 on: May 01, 2021, 10:00:17 AM »
I would reply that I think Wolters has yet to convince everyone, although he seems to have convinced some. Obviously Amaral believed what he wrote. Whether that makes him incompetent remains to be seen, but if he did pursue the wrong suspects he won't be the first or the last policeman to do that.

Wolters doesn't have to convince everyone... He hasn't revealed his evidence yet but SY have said they are working very very closely with the Germans... That sounds very supportive to me
« Last Edit: May 01, 2021, 10:05:20 AM by Davel »

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #214 on: May 01, 2021, 10:17:16 AM »
Wolters doesn't have to convince everyone... He hasn't revealed his evidence yet but SY have said they are working very very closely with the Germans... That sounds very supportive to me

So closely that they haven't shared their evidence & SY haven't reached the same conclusion.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #215 on: May 01, 2021, 10:19:06 AM »
So closely that they haven't shared their evidence & SY haven't reached the same conclusion.

And Wolters has explained why he hadn't shared... Its boring going over the same things

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #216 on: May 01, 2021, 10:20:52 AM »
And Wolters has explained why he hadn't shared... Its boring going over the same things

Wolters has nothing.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #217 on: May 01, 2021, 10:24:01 AM »
No, it wouldn't be Libellous.  Amaral is a convicted perjurer.

And? obviously the coals aren't cold yet, talk about bitter, mind I like a pint of it, so keep pouring.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #218 on: May 01, 2021, 10:24:36 AM »

The evidence against Brueckner is so incredibly damning that he can't be charged or tried with anything.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #219 on: May 01, 2021, 10:25:36 AM »
Wolters has nothing.

Nothing is better than something, if the something turns out worse than the nothing.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #220 on: May 01, 2021, 10:26:42 AM »
The evidence against Brueckner is so incredibly damning that he can't be charged or tried with anything.


Yeah but, his name is out there, just like the man who shot Liberty Valance, only he didn't.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #221 on: May 01, 2021, 10:27:51 AM »
There once were pictures of fairies at the bottom of some one's garden, took years to bust that myth.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #222 on: May 01, 2021, 10:28:37 AM »
As far as I know no public comment was made by Amaral until after his retirement.

You are wrong.

His rant to a reporter led to him being taken off the case.

"The source close to the PJ" convention which had been in force for some time was disregarded on this occasion so perhaps his public comment was made inadvertently ~ but it was 'public comment' and it was made prior to his retirement.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #223 on: May 01, 2021, 10:30:13 AM »
You are wrong.

His rant to a reporter led to him being taken off the case.

"The source close to the PJ" convention which had been in force for some time was disregarded on this occasion so perhaps his public comment was made inadvertently ~ but it was 'public comment' and it was made prior to his retirement.

I get the link now, Wolters has a snap of Amaral.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #224 on: May 01, 2021, 10:32:49 AM »
I get the link now, Wolters has a snap of Amaral.

Amaral & that Cristovao bloke helped Martin Ney & Brueckner abduct Maddie, Joana & Renee Hasee.

I believe Wolters has photographic evidence of all of this.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club