Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 44378 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #270 on: May 03, 2021, 09:29:11 AM »
a proven sighting of Gerry or a doubtful one?

More solid than any sighting of Brueckner, of which there are none.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #271 on: May 03, 2021, 09:29:43 AM »
How do you know?

Easy. He hasn't presented anything.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #272 on: May 03, 2021, 09:29:50 AM »
This is a thread about photographic evidence. Simple answer, yes he found/saw the bundle Smithman put down and opened it, boy did he get a surprise, took a photo for some perverted pleasure/insurance, prove it wrong mr prosecutor, CB never abducted any live body.
One of the most absurd theories I've ever heard and as believable as "the dog ate my homework". 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #273 on: May 03, 2021, 09:30:15 AM »
Easy. He hasn't presented anything.
Why do you think he should have presented it to you then?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #274 on: May 03, 2021, 09:31:10 AM »
One of the most absurd theories I've ever heard and as believable as "the dog ate my homework".

Not quite on par with a stranger going into 5a and lifting Madeleine away with out a trace.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #275 on: May 03, 2021, 09:31:25 AM »
More solid than any sighting of Brueckner, of which there are none.
The evidence that Bruckner was in PdL that night is more solid as the Smithman evidence I would say.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #276 on: May 03, 2021, 09:31:36 AM »
Why do you think he should have presented it to you then?

He hasn't even presented it to SY, despite it being a very, very serious investigation & working very closely with them.

He's like a man who claims a big penis but is scared to get it out at a urinal.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #277 on: May 03, 2021, 09:31:54 AM »
The evidence that Bruckner was in PdL that night is more solid as the Smithman evidence I would say.

He lived there. Go figure.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #278 on: May 03, 2021, 09:32:11 AM »
The evidence that Bruckner was in PdL that night is more solid as the Smithman evidence I would say.


There is?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #279 on: May 03, 2021, 09:32:41 AM »
Not quite on par with some one going into 5a and lifting Madeleine away with out a trace.
So you think abduction is a farcical, impossible fantasy do you?  At least two professional police forces disagree with you so it would seem your opinion counts for very little.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #280 on: May 03, 2021, 09:33:24 AM »

There is?

He used a mobile phone.

You know who else used mobile phones that night?

The McCanns, only they never bothered calling the police on them.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #281 on: May 03, 2021, 09:33:50 AM »
He lived there. Go figure.

Much like the 3 amigo's SY questioned, asking at the time did you kill Madeleine, it was reported.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #282 on: May 03, 2021, 09:34:28 AM »
So you think abduction is a farcical, impossible fantasy do you?  At least two professional police forces disagree with you so it would seem your opinion counts for very little.

Two professional police forces who make bold claims but have presented nothing.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #283 on: May 03, 2021, 09:34:38 AM »
He lived there. Go figure.
Right - so you accept he was there at the time of the disappearance.  A paedophile and rapist with an interest in little girls and entering holiday apartments unlawfully.  Do you think he should never even have been investigated?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #284 on: May 03, 2021, 09:34:49 AM »
So you think abduction is a farcical, impossible fantasy do you?  At least two professional police forces disagree with you so it would seem your opinion counts for very little.

That may be the very reason its still at an investigation stage.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.