Ah, forums. Yes, I've read all sorts on forums, and yes, I've come across Gordo. In your previous post, you gave the impression that SL had accused people of incest and abuse in her books. She would probably have been sued for libel if she had done this. People get away with it on forums, because, for the most part, nobody knows who anyone else is. They do like to accuse each other of being certain people, of course.
I was reading a forum the other day, actually. One or two of the most unlikely people used to think Luke was innocent------------------, and, in addition, did not speak against Sandra Lean. Interesting, reading forums!
Absolutely not - my post did not say or imply that at all - it was clear, that I was speaking about people making these claims upon taking on board Ms Leans information. That the way in which the information is given across leads into horrendous interpretation of it. - which is exactly the point , is it not? - And of these means being undignified to what had actually happened to Jodi Jones.
Of another discussion. That appeared to go of for some time. Could not quite grasp the beginning of the arms and legs - which stemmed from an ID of this stocky man some 9 weeks after Jodi's death. From a group of people whom all looked the same. The author pushing their information to the extreme, without actually saying the words. This type of manipulation that gave cause to - rightly so, of this girls funeral, which was of course 9 weeks after her death, and of a group of males dressed the same - black. - Where she makes sure those dots are joined correctly without spitting the actual words out. That fine line of liable. - To of course people then stating he was seen carrying this girls coffin, just in-case people were having difficulty joining the dots. Therefore it had to be someone very close to Jodi, if they were carrying her coffin. As it appeared some were having a little difficulty in pin pointing who the male could be?.
To which I pointed out, that any pictures I came across where of the people from the undertakers - as they were the ones carrying the coffin and not Jodi's family. To which Ms Lean then decided to make an appearance - To state clearly that she had never actually mentioned carrying the coffin? - But it was evident that this information, given behind closed doors had been blurted out, that it was hush hush, and that Ms Lean was trying to fix this. - that this witness who ID the stocky man had yet again been wrong. It was a false trail. To which one must use in the proper context in the first instance - The appeal for him, was on the basis of someone who may have seen Jodi as were the boys on the bike, as was the girl with the pushchair. Looking to locate, for further information and elimination if need be. - again an area of being led down that proverbial garden path. Where these highly trained professionals - had every piece of information on this. - But one needs something to distract away from LM, do they not?
It is using this type of tactic to disperse doubt, to distract away from yet again from LM. As with the bike at the V. The minute truthful part, as with above - of someone making a statement/given information - is used which was demonstrably wrong. The witness was someone from Basically Tool Hire. That they had given an indication of where on this path the bike may have been and "close to" this V was used. Whilst driving on the "Beeches". - morphed into a witness stating they saw this bike up against the wall at this V with no boys in sight. - Now Ms Lean knows this is impossible to see, from where they were and so forth - but due to having this small piece of information, the minute truthful part - then one can use this to push it across as something more sinister - to leave the reader thinking one thing only. -That this bike had been seen at this V, with no boys in sight - which is nonsense. Thus why I highlighted the irony in using this whilst on the other hand - Ms Lean states that the V is not easy to see, unless one knows what they are looking for? Whilst actually being on this very path itself - far less in a car, in a national speed limit zone - looking across an expansive field. Hundreds of yards away. - Where it is physically impossible to see this V. Not only at the distance, but behind the trees that are on the field side of this path - sheltering this very V. - it's ok thought is it not - these boys were liars anyway? easy meat to prey on?? As DF used the same tactic in trying to trip them up - by asking them why their bike was spotted at a stand still close to this V "I dunno" replied the rather dim JF. These boys did not, ever admit to their bike being riderless at any point unless they were pushing it, having a rest.They drove up and down this path and were home by 5.30pm. Barley on RDP and LP for around 20mins.
After the boys on the moped passed through the tool hire place, an employee there told police that s/he spotted the bike parked against the V break (with no people in sight) on the witness's drive home.
