Author Topic: Sandra's exit - The real reasons  (Read 121563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #435 on: July 24, 2021, 10:54:15 AM »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #436 on: July 24, 2021, 10:56:49 AM »
I don't know that much about him and haven't watched the interview with Sandra Lean. Looks like he has lots of support.

He apparently has lots of sock puppets
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline rulesapply

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #437 on: July 24, 2021, 10:08:54 PM »
He apparently has lots of sock puppets

After appearing on the True Geordie podcast, Attwood started his own 'True Crime' podcast and has a YouTube channel that reached 652,000 subscribers on 19 Jan 2021. ... On July 22nd 2021 Attwood's channel was terminated by YouTube, causing much nashing of teeth.

This is what my Google search yielded about Shaun Attwood's YouTube channel. I admit to not looking in depth but given that YouTube and Google are one in the same, I have to assume his YouTube channel is no more. At least, for now.

Offline Dexter

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #438 on: July 24, 2021, 10:15:06 PM »
After appearing on the True Geordie podcast, Attwood started his own 'True Crime' podcast and has a YouTube channel that reached 652,000 subscribers on 19 Jan 2021. ... On July 22nd 2021 Attwood's channel was terminated by YouTube, causing much nashing of teeth.

This is what my Google search yielded about Shaun Attwood's YouTube channel. I admit to not looking in depth but given that YouTube and Google are one in the same, I have to assume his YouTube channel is no more. At least, for now.

No it's been reinstated as I said earlier.

Offline rulesapply

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #439 on: July 24, 2021, 10:23:22 PM »
No it's been reinstated as I said earlier.
Thank you.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #440 on: July 25, 2021, 01:03:48 PM »
No it's been reinstated as I said earlier.

It’s been removed again apparently
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline rulesapply

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #441 on: July 25, 2021, 01:58:13 PM »
It’s been removed again apparently

It seems so. Thanks.

Offline Dexter

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #442 on: July 25, 2021, 03:13:59 PM »
It seems so. Thanks.

YouTube have put it back on. Maybe this time it will stay...who knows.

Offline rulesapply

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #443 on: July 30, 2021, 07:28:28 PM »
YouTube have put it back on. Maybe this time it will stay...who knows.
YouTube did. It's all about the money.

Offline Bullseye

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #444 on: August 05, 2021, 07:32:30 PM »
Since the statement from Luke was released back in June by Lisa C Reynolds Peden, I’ve not heard any updates, was wondering if anyone else has. It seemed from the statement Luke wanted to take more control, Sandra was to release information withheld for years and all statements from Luke and Corinne would be made by Lisa C Reynolds Peden. Sandra then stepped back and was to hand over all documents to someone on 30th June. I believe from the statement edit Luke’s lawyer would then see what can legally be released and everything has since went silent. No updates and nothing from Lisa C Reynolds Peden, Luke  or Corinne, did he thank the folk who protested for him in Edinburgh, or sent him Birthday wishes, is the lawyer still going through the boxes of paperwork, is anything going to be released ever or, like Sandra, does the lawyer not think the info can/should be released, does he even have a new lawyer?? So many questions but no updates.
Sandra had gained so much interest in the case with the documentary etc and was keeping people talking and asking questions during her weekly updates. I think a lot of people will soon lose interest, if they have not already, if there is nobody to take over her good work.
So far IMO Lisa C Reynolds Peden and Luke’s statement has not done any good for Luke in anyway.

Offline Dexter

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #445 on: August 05, 2021, 07:55:52 PM »
Since the statement from Luke was released back in June by Lisa C Reynolds Peden, I’ve not heard any updates, was wondering if anyone else has. It seemed from the statement Luke wanted to take more control, Sandra was to release information withheld for years and all statements from Luke and Corinne would be made by Lisa C Reynolds Peden. Sandra then stepped back and was to hand over all documents to someone on 30th June. I believe from the statement edit Luke’s lawyer would then see what can legally be released and everything has since went silent. No updates and nothing from Lisa C Reynolds Peden, Luke  or Corinne, did he thank the folk who protested for him in Edinburgh, or sent him Birthday wishes, is the lawyer still going through the boxes of paperwork, is anything going to be released ever or, like Sandra, does the lawyer not think the info can/should be released, does he even have a new lawyer?? So many questions but no updates.
Sandra had gained so much interest in the case with the documentary etc and was keeping people talking and asking questions during her weekly updates. I think a lot of people will soon lose interest, if they have not already, if there is nobody to take over her good work.
So far IMO Lisa C Reynolds Peden and Luke’s statement has not done any good for Luke in anyway.

very good and interesting questions Bullseye

Offline Parky41

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #446 on: August 08, 2021, 11:02:08 PM »
Since the statement from Luke was released back in June by Lisa C Reynolds Peden, I’ve not heard any updates, was wondering if anyone else has. It seemed from the statement Luke wanted to take more control, Sandra was to release information withheld for years and all statements from Luke and Corinne would be made by Lisa C Reynolds Peden. Sandra then stepped back and was to hand over all documents to someone on 30th June. I believe from the statement edit Luke’s lawyer would then see what can legally be released and everything has since went silent. No updates and nothing from Lisa C Reynolds Peden, Luke  or Corinne, did he thank the folk who protested for him in Edinburgh, or sent him Birthday wishes, is the lawyer still going through the boxes of paperwork, is anything going to be released ever or, like Sandra, does the lawyer not think the info can/should be released, does he even have a new lawyer?? So many questions but no updates.
Sandra had gained so much interest in the case with the documentary etc and was keeping people talking and asking questions during her weekly updates. I think a lot of people will soon lose interest, if they have not already, if there is nobody to take over her good work.
So far IMO Lisa C Reynolds Peden and Luke’s statement has not done any good for Luke in anyway.

Good work and getting put out in the cold? - Not at all, is it not merely the continuation of whatever feud happened after the SCCRC, when she was stripped of being POA? The book, already well under way, prior to MOJO? But the book could go nowhere without all three being involved. And again we have that collusion to benefit all three. They needed each other, plain and simple? - And one would be rather foolish, would they not, if they did not realise that Mitchells input, his say in the book had to meet a certain standard, or there simply would be no book. His case files not Ms Leans. Which in reality enters also into the realms of profit, does it not? What seemed apparent is that there was some dispute going on, over who was to hold the purse strings - that divide in two main support groups. The official and the one now claimed to be CM and Luke's.

And of lawyers, appeals, new evidence and the rest - still waiting on those same claims coming to pass from three years ago? When support was being needed, the promotion of the book. Monies asked for to pay the way for Ms Leans man hours. And to recently, where she made it clear, if she were going to be involved actively in campaigning - then her man hours needed to be paid for. The role was to be fronting an official charity group, again? That she would need to leave her employment. This same organisation that was promised three years ago?

Perhaps, what would be better for all concerned, that have actually been sucked in by the book and doc - is clarity, truth as to what has actually happened between the Mitchells and Ms Lean - truth however is not an easy thing to obtain? The official group, still putting one upon a pedestal. Promoting all she has done for the Mitchells? - One needs to, in reality realise one's own promotion first? That two way street of give and take. That if there had been any clear clarification from LM via Ms Lean, in clear favour of herself - she would be letting people know this, would she not?

Just my humble opinion, of course, as always.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #447 on: August 08, 2021, 11:12:25 PM »
Good work and getting put out in the cold? - Not at all, is it not merely the continuation of whatever feud happened after the SCCRC, when she was stripped of being POA? The book, already well under way, prior to MOJO? But the book could go nowhere without all three being involved. And again we have that collusion to benefit all three. They needed each other, plain and simple? - And one would be rather foolish, would they not, if they did not realise that Mitchells input, his say in the book had to meet a certain standard, or there simply would be no book. His case files not Ms Leans. Which in reality enters also into the realms of profit, does it not? What seemed apparent is that there was some dispute going on, over who was to hold the purse strings - that divide in two main support groups. The official and the one now claimed to be CM and Luke's.

And of lawyers, appeals, new evidence and the rest - still waiting on those same claims coming to pass from three years ago? When support was being needed, the promotion of the book. Monies asked for to pay the way for Ms Leans man hours. And to recently, where she made it clear, if she were going to be involved actively in campaigning - then her man hours needed to be paid for. The role was to be fronting an official charity group, again? That she would need to leave her employment. This same organisation that was promised three years ago?

Perhaps, what would be better for all concerned, that have actually been sucked in by the book and doc - is clarity, truth as to what has actually happened between the Mitchells and Ms Lean - truth however is not an easy thing to obtain? The official group, still putting one upon a pedestal. Promoting all she has done for the Mitchells? - One needs to, in reality realise one's own promotion first? That two way street of give and take. That if there had been any clear clarification from LM via Ms Lean, in clear favour of herself - she would be letting people know this, would she not?

Just my humble opinion, of course, as always.

Looking forward to your forthcoming book. Where will your profits be going? Surely not into your own pocket? Distasteful making money from the death of a young girl, is it not?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline rulesapply

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #448 on: August 08, 2021, 11:20:33 PM »
Looking forward to your forthcoming book. Where will your profits be going? Surely not into your own pocket? Distasteful making money from the death of a young girl, is it not?

Says the defender of the killer and mutilator of a child.

Offline Dexter

Re: Sandra's exit - The real reasons
« Reply #449 on: August 09, 2021, 07:38:05 AM »
Says the defender of the killer and mutilator of a child.

It's a fair question considering what has been stated previously