Sandra's exit - The real reasons

[rulesapply]

What a lot of sanctimonious claptrap from a couple of numpties.
I suspect it’s merely a cheap ploy to garner controversial rivalry+publicity ratings=revenue especially since Mr Attwood has been a very naughty boy recently.
Any bets on for Parky vs Lean?

Mates getting views for each other? I think so. IMO.

[rulesapply]

That isn't true though is it. You might not agree with her findings but she has definitely seen the case paperwork.

She has also stated that she has not seen all of it.

[Rusty]

I completely agree, this is about the hideous murder of a child by someone she loved and trusted.
I certainly don't speak on Parky behalf nor would I ever endorse such a debate for it would only do so to promote her book which of course would be her primary purpose.

If a debate was indeed to take place on her gameship rules of masquerading misinformation to research and innuendo to facts combined with her talent for suggestive thinking with us lesser mortals I'm sure the good doctor would be in a great advantage to win just a contest.

However I am yet to read or see any such debate or discussion from any of her fellow peers in regards to this case or for that matter on this very forum.
I wonder why that is?

Lean would not have the guts to go face to face with someone that challenges her narrative. What is it she calls them? Trolls. Lean likes to be molly cuddled from her minions. Those ones that nod in agreement. She has a couple of her minions on here doing her dirty work, trying to distract, goad, attack anyone that challenges Leans fairy tales. You can spot them a mile off.

[Dexter]

Lean would not have the guts to go face to face with someone that challenges her narrative. What is it she calls them? Trolls. Lean likes to be molly cuddled from her minions. Those ones that nod in agreement. She has a couple of her minions on here doing her dirty work, trying to distract, goad, attack anyone that challenges Leans fairy tales. You can spot them a mile off.

So you accuse Sandra Lean of calling anyone who disagrees with her a troll. Then you attack anyone who agrees with her naming calling and all? 

[rulesapply]

Not what you posted though is it?

That is what SL has said all by herself. 

[rulesapply]

So you accuse Sandra Lean of calling anyone who disagrees with her a troll. Then you attack anyone who agrees with her naming calling and all? 

SL is dishonest. I see it. Many others see it. If you don't see it, up to you.

[Dexter]

SL is dishonest. I see it. Many others see it. If you don't see it, up to you.

Once again your reply has NOTHING to do with my actual comment.

[rulesapply]

Once again your reply has NOTHING to do with my actual comment.

That's because I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Dexter]

Are you still logging in and out here on an hourly basis? Apart from your input from when you first showed up, which you have yet to provide evidence for. All you have done, is like comments, and well offered nothing else apart from trying to wind other posters up. I see right though you pal.

 It's not me who writes well into the early hours.

[Dexter]

Are you still logging in and out here on an hourly basis? Apart from your input from when you first showed up, which you have yet to provide evidence for. All you have done, is like comments, and well offered nothing else apart from trying to wind other posters up. I see right though you pal.

Oh btw Rusty I don't log in  on and out as you state. Something else you are wrong about. Do you count my likes aww such dedication. Bless

[rulesapply]

Oh btw Rusty I don't log in  on and out as you state. Something else you are wrong about. Do you count my likes aww such dedication. Bless

You're evasion of questions about Scott Forbes whilst having so much knowledge, sticks in my head. So many questions you didn't answer whilst pretending you didn't know how to!

[Dexter]

But you DO wind the rest of us up whilst pretending to be an innocent. Don't you? You're evasion of questions about Scott Forbes whilst having so much knowledge, sticks in my head. So many questions you didn't answer whilst pretending you didn't know how to! A charlatan? Yes, IMO.

The rest of you?

You asked questions about SF which in fact you demanded. He replied and you didn't believe it was him.
Yet you stamped your feet for more!

So many questions I didn't answer? firstly most of the stuff you want to know you have no legal right to see and be answered on. You don't accept this and I dont have to do what you demand.

It has been suggested you ask SF directly as you kept mentioning his Twitter. He was waiting...you didnt.

[Dexter]

He is well and truly triggered 

Who is he?

[rulesapply]

He is well and truly triggered 

You brought Scott Forbes into this. I asked questions about him that you seemed able to answer then, you couldn't, in fact, still haven't answered. I didn't demand anything except the cities that this forum (sometimes) requires.

[mrswah]

Lean would not have the guts to go face to face with someone that challenges her narrative. What is it she calls them? Trolls. Lean likes to be molly cuddled from her minions. Those ones that nod in agreement. She has a couple of her minions on here doing her dirty work, trying to distract, goad, attack anyone that challenges Leans fairy tales. You can spot them a mile off.

I don't agree. Even if SL turns out to be wrong, IMO, she is brave.

I very much doubt anyone is on her doing her "dirty work".