Author Topic: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?  (Read 287391 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1500 on: April 03, 2025, 07:40:33 PM »
There's no evidence Brueckner even knew of Madeleine's existence on May 3rd, or that he came into contact with her. Whereas there is plenty of evidence the McCanns did. So it's more likely it was them.
That’s the logic I’d expect from a 5 year old not an actual grown up which you claim to be.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1501 on: April 03, 2025, 07:41:27 PM »
Legally maybe. But are they innocent in Fact? No is the answer to that one.
Christian Bruckner is guilty in fact then.  Absolutely 100% guilty in fact.  OK?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1502 on: April 03, 2025, 07:42:06 PM »
Christian Bruckner is guilty in fact then.  Absolutely 100% guilty in fact.  OK?

No.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1503 on: April 03, 2025, 07:43:29 PM »
That’s the logic I’d expect from a 5 year old not an actual grown up which you claim to be.

Out come the insults. It isn't my fault no one can prove Maddie was abducted.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1504 on: April 03, 2025, 08:05:51 PM »
No.
Well he is.  100% guilty.  In fact.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1505 on: April 03, 2025, 08:06:50 PM »
Out come the insults. It isn't my fault no one can prove Maddie was abducted.
but it is your fault that you having chosen WUMming as your hobby and that is a very childish way to spend your free time.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1506 on: April 03, 2025, 11:19:29 PM »
but it is your fault that you having chosen WUMming as your hobby and that is a very childish way to spend your free time.

It only takes a few moments & if I manage to offend or upset at least one person a day then it isn't time wasted for me.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1507 on: April 03, 2025, 11:49:27 PM »
It only takes a few moments & if I manage to offend or upset at least one person a day then it isn't time wasted for me.
a childish ambition, and the sad thing is you’re not even that good at it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1508 on: April 04, 2025, 06:11:48 AM »
a childish ambition, and the sad thing is you’re not even that good at it.

You're quite right. You're the biggest troll around here without even trying.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1509 on: April 04, 2025, 07:15:28 AM »
You're quite right. You're the biggest troll around here without even trying.
I am right and your post just proved it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1510 on: April 04, 2025, 07:26:16 AM »
I am right and your post just proved it.

No. I am right & your posts prove nothing.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1511 on: April 04, 2025, 08:13:50 AM »
No. I am right & your posts prove nothing.
I think it’s high time I put little children back on ignore.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1512 on: April 04, 2025, 09:41:34 AM »
And there are still more sightings of Gerry abducting Maddie than there are of Christian Brueckner.
This succinctly sums up the whole Brueckner debacle. The McCann sycophants keep rattling on about 'evidence' of parental involvement, despite there being way more circumstantial evidence and eye witness testimony against them than the hapless hobo Brueckner.

The evidence Hansie relied on 5 years ago, in legal terms and logical terms, has either been discounted or he conflated its significance. He was so unsure of his evidence, despite public proclamations to the contrary, he was too scared to interview Brueckner under caution. The reason? He would have to disclose what he had which would give Brueckner and his team a chance to formulate a defence - you know, due process and all that afforded to all suspected of a serious crime - pathetic. Let's pause for thought, though; if he went to the prosecutors with his evidence, which he must have done, and they told him to gather more evidence, what better way to achieve that than to arrest the man and question him, given that he was so sure of what he currently had?

Let's hark back to the good old days when the PJ were wittily branded 'Keystone Cops', (as the sycos couldn't come up with a novel idiom) and Amaral was 'sardine munching, drunk, fat', again, because they're mostly middle-aged racists.
Well I'll use a tired, worn out figurative desciptor of my own; Hansie is a latter day Inspector Clouseau - proven to be comically inept. Cases tried - 1, cases lost 1. It will stay at 0 for 1 forever, as he was simply too scared to arrest Brueckner, outwitted by a dopey hobo - TWICE!
« Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 10:02:29 AM by Eleanor »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1513 on: April 04, 2025, 03:40:23 PM »
Voluntary??  Let me tell you something - I get paid good money for this, though demand for my services has tailed off in the last 10 years since more and more loony ol' sceptics either died of old age or lost interest. One or two even came to their senses and realised how dumb they'd been though they'll never admit it publicly of course....

So according to post your solely interest on here -  is protecting the mccs.

Not what happened to Maddie it seems,

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1514 on: April 04, 2025, 03:41:54 PM »
No he doesn’t need to do that.  The only reason he’s involved in this case at all is because the chief and only suspect is a German, banged up in a German prison and about whom he has uncovered or been presented with compelling albeit circumstantial evidence.  It’s not his job to interview the McCanns, and why would he need to anyway?  They aren’t going to tell him anything he doesn’t already know about the case.  Nor is it his job to find an alternative suspect or theory.  The McCanns are innocent by the way.

The McCanns are innocent by the way.

Obviously that is your view,.....a great amount of the public don't share your view.

It seems the media ect are afraid to speak out publicly on anything but abduction 

The 11 top lawyers they employed and others -  did a good job.

Afterall either Maddie was abducted or she wasnt.........there is no evidence that she was.