Author Topic: Eddie's alert in the garden  (Read 90763 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #105 on: April 13, 2016, 12:42:16 PM »
IIRC it has been shown on here that the dogs alert to any human remains /fluids/ scents has it not?  Please correct me if I am remembering this incorrectly.

That's one of them thar myths you keep on about.

"Forensic Search Dog (The primary focus of this paper)
A canine that has been specifically trained to indicate a scent source as being from decomposed human tissue. Such animals are also trained to exclude (deconditioned to) the scent of human urine, feces, and semen and will not alert on residual scent from a live human; and have never been trained to locate any scent other than that of decomposed human tissue".
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #106 on: April 13, 2016, 12:42:46 PM »
I like your style Peggy  ?{)(**

There was this bloke named Matthew Zarella who used dogs to find MIAs in VietNam.
He had some interesting things to to say about scent and how long it lasted. Another geezer named Andy Rebmann who wrote extensively on the topic did too.

there is a difference in remnant scent and that emanating from a body that is still in situ....two completely different situations

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #107 on: April 13, 2016, 01:01:59 PM »
This search by Eddie was months after the body had been removed.

Further searches identified a location where the EVRD alerted in the front bedroom of the offender's empty next door dwelling house.
When interviewed the suspect admitted that the body had laid in the room for 1 hour prior to disposal. Forensic teams were unable to extract any forensic evidence despite being shown the exact position.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #108 on: April 13, 2016, 01:05:23 PM »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #109 on: April 13, 2016, 01:08:12 PM »
Why has the neck/collar tag been ripped off?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #110 on: April 13, 2016, 01:10:55 PM »
there is a difference in remnant scent and that emanating from a body that is still in situ....two completely different situations
... only one of which might result in detection months later?

Offline pegasus

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #111 on: April 13, 2016, 01:12:39 PM »
Why has the neck/collar tag been ripped off?
Nothing's been ripped off Pathfinder, they are two different manufacturing versions.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #112 on: April 13, 2016, 01:18:06 PM »
This search by Eddie was months after the body had been removed.

Further searches identified a location where the EVRD alerted in the front bedroom of the offender's empty next door dwelling house.
When interviewed the suspect admitted that the body had laid in the room for 1 hour prior to disposal. Forensic teams were unable to extract any forensic evidence despite being shown the exact position.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

which case is this on your link...do you have a name as I can't see it

found it now  seems the house was unoccupied so undisturbed....how long after the death did the dog go in
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 01:21:31 PM by davel »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #113 on: April 13, 2016, 02:21:38 PM »
Attracta Harron - nearly 4 months later. McCann case was only 3 months later.

Mr Mooney told the jury, the Fire Brigade had been called to a car fire at 12.57pm on December 11, 2003 to Hamilton’s home.

He said highly trained dogs were also employed on April 5, 2004 to search the property and the river, and it was through the dogs that the remains were found.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 02:25:44 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #114 on: April 13, 2016, 02:32:54 PM »
To my understanding they collected broken branches. Probably wondering the reason why they had broken off the climbing plant. Detective work needs to follow up this lead after Eddie was most interested in that area.

Martin Grime said further investigation was required; if such was ever carried out it added nothing to Eddie's 'interest' since we have heard nothing further.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #115 on: April 13, 2016, 02:42:28 PM »
Attracta Harron - nearly 4 months later. McCann case was only 3 months later.

Mr Mooney told the jury, the Fire Brigade had been called to a car fire at 12.57pm on December 11, 2003 to Hamilton’s home.

He said highly trained dogs were also employed on April 5, 2004 to search the property and the river, and it was through the dogs that the remains were found.

in this case the house was empty and therefore undisturbed...as opposed to the mccanns apt ...that makes a massive difference

Offline Carana

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #116 on: April 13, 2016, 02:51:03 PM »
To my understanding they collected broken branches. Probably wondering the reason why they had broken off the climbing plant. Detective work needs to follow up this lead after Eddie was most interested in that area.

They did get them checked for synthetic fibres, but there weren't any.

What doesn't appear to have been investigated is whether there was a crawl space under there or not.

Offline pegasus

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #117 on: April 13, 2016, 02:56:08 PM »
They did get them checked for synthetic fibres, but there weren't any. (snip)
The main fabric of both parts of her pyjamas was natural cotton.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #118 on: April 13, 2016, 03:02:11 PM »
Attracta Harron - nearly 4 months later. McCann case was only 3 months later.

Mr Mooney told the jury, the Fire Brigade had been called to a car fire at 12.57pm on December 11, 2003 to Hamilton’s home.

He said highly trained dogs were also employed on April 5, 2004 to search the property and the river, and it was through the dogs that the remains were found.

Attracta Harron was Eddie's finest hour....but it seems he had very few hours

Offline Brietta

Re: Eddie's alert in the garden
« Reply #119 on: April 13, 2016, 03:07:12 PM »
in this case the house was empty and therefore undisturbed...as opposed to the mccanns apt ...that makes a massive difference

There were three or four different sets of people holidaying in the house in the intervening period.  That would have involved a normal cleaning routine plus a deep clean between each occupancy.

Entirely different from an enclosed, undisturbed area.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....