Author Topic: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?  (Read 55294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mrs. B

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #195 on: June 06, 2013, 09:00:22 PM »
Quite the opposite, there was EVERY need. In fact, Amaral still didn't believe the existence of an abductor regardless of the window being opened. He went for the dastardly parents instead. Makes you wonder what Amaral expected the abductor to leave behind in way of acceptable "evidence". Business card? Written confession? Copy of passport & address details?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #196 on: June 06, 2013, 09:06:07 PM »
so,  far nothing has been established to prove the abductor struck as jane tanner was alledgedly spotting a man, in fact most things point to it being untrue, which leads to to a question thathas been asked before

WHY did the Mccanns INSIST time after time this was the abduction sighting, to the point of agerry saying he was almost caught by Jane, and at least the most probable one as opposed to the Smiths sighting which is just as credible if not MORE so or any other happening that no one saw in between, in fact the Tanner sighting makes the LEAST sense of all scenarios

Offline Mrs. B

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #197 on: June 06, 2013, 09:08:14 PM »
Bit rich coming from someone who is incapable of coming up with ANY scenario at all, don't you think...

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #198 on: June 06, 2013, 09:13:23 PM »
Bit rich coming from someone who is incapable of coming up with ANY scenario at all, don't you think...
Q
Stick to the topic please, helps things, also *helps* if you make clear who you are *talking* to


 8((()*/


Online Eleanor

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #199 on: June 06, 2013, 09:19:53 PM »

I find it helps if you don't make clear who you are talking to.


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #201 on: June 06, 2013, 10:14:12 PM »
Excuse me.  Who heard Gerry McCann speaking about Paedophile Gangs on the telephone?

I think that even I might need a Cite for that one.

Even I? As you are one of the ones claiming to have read the files thorougly, your CITE here  because you  OBVIOUSLY missed it and insinuated it wasnt true

 


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GRAHAM-MCKENZIE.htm

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #202 on: June 06, 2013, 10:21:52 PM »
Why Icabod?  Your reasons please

Because they were left unlocked

No windows needed to be opened ...  no shutters needed to be raised ...  no duplicate key was required

The patio doors were left  unlocked

Offline sadie

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #203 on: June 06, 2013, 10:54:19 PM »
Because they were left unlocked

No windows needed to be opened ...  no shutters needed to be raised ...  no duplicate key was required

The patio doors were left  unlocked

Yep and in one of his inter mediatry statements, now whooshed, Amaral said no way could anyone have got into 5A via the patio doors, because the parents and friends were too close at 50 metres.  At the time he was also saying that nobody could have got in by the front door, nor by the window. 

This statement was made at the point in the investigation when he was trying (desperately) to prove that there could have been no abductor; that Madeleine was dead in the apartment. 

So many 'flies' were picked out of his hypothesis at the time, that all trace of it vanished from off the internet

Offline faithlilly

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #204 on: June 06, 2013, 10:56:28 PM »
Yep and in one of his inter mediatry statements, now whooshed, Amaral said no way could anyone have got into 5A via the patio doors, because the parents and friends were too close at 50 metres.  At the time he was also saying that nobody could have got in by the front door, nor by the window. 

This statement was made at the point in the investigation when he was trying (desperately) to prove that there could have been no abductor; that Madeleine was dead in the apartment. 

So many 'flies' were picked out of his hypothesis at the time, that all trace of it vanished from off the internet

Weird eh  @)(++(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #205 on: June 06, 2013, 11:05:37 PM »
Yep and in one of his inter mediatry statements, now whooshed, Amaral said no way could anyone have got into 5A via the patio doors, because the parents and friends were too close at 50 metres.  At the time he was also saying that nobody could have got in by the front door, nor by the window. 

This statement was made at the point in the investigation when he was trying (desperately) to prove that there could have been no abductor; that Madeleine was dead in the apartment. 

So many 'flies' were picked out of his hypothesis at the time, that all trace of it vanished from off the internet

Is that what he said  ...  that the patio doors couldn't have been used because the parents and friends were too near  ?

I don't see any logic in that at all 

I would say though,  that the patio doors could not have been used by Jane Tanner's abductor,  because Gerry and Jez were standing right outside the path that lead to them

I suppose that is why Gerry says he thinks the abductor was already in the apartment  ( hiding )   when he made his check

Offline sadie

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #206 on: June 06, 2013, 11:07:59 PM »
Weird eh  @)(++(*

Yep, I agree

Very weird that the Chief Investigator, Amaral, did not even think of a key being used
Very weird that the C.I. did not even know that there had been burglaries in the OC apartments by entering thru the front door with no damage to the doors
Very weird that the C.I. did not even know that the apartment immediately above the McCanns had been entered by the front door using a key presumably only a couple of weeks before

Very very weird that the Chief Investigator did not know these things



Also very very weird that after realizing what a fool had been made of Amaral ... the info about it vanished from off the internet

Unless you can find it !

Offline sadie

Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #207 on: June 06, 2013, 11:10:51 PM »
Is that what he said  ...  that the patio doors couldn't have been used because the parents and friends were too near  ?

I don't see any logic in that at all 

I would say though,  that the patio doors could not have been used by Jane Tanner's abductor,  because Gerry and Jez were standing right outside the path that lead to them

I suppose that is why Gerry says he thinks the abductor was already in the apartment  ( hiding )   when he made his check

Are you accusing Gerry of telling deliberate lies?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #208 on: June 06, 2013, 11:17:08 PM »
Are you accusing Gerry of telling deliberate lies?

Even if he is why shouldnt he,  dont stop you and others accusing all sorts of lies,hypocrite, and liar, toodles
 8((()*/

 

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: If the man Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, how long did he have ?
« Reply #209 on: June 06, 2013, 11:17:57 PM »
Are you accusing Gerry of telling deliberate lies?

I am saying that if the abductor Jane Tanner saw was the abductor, then he would have to have already been in the apartment when Gerry made his check  ...  because he couldn't have  entered  by way of  the patio doors without passing Gerry and Jez

I pointed out that Gerry probably thought the same thing  ...  why else would he have mentioned the abductor already being in the apartment  ( hiding )  when he made his check  ?