Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?

[faithlilly]

Then you presumably don't approve of "sources close to the investigation" leakng to Felicia Cabrita and her Sol articles, or Tal & Qual, 24 Horas, CdaM and whoever else?

No.

[ferryman]

No excuse. Judicial secrecy is absolute.

One thing I condone is that the Portuguese authorities clamp down much harder on its own police than others for breaches of secrecy.

I think I'm right that Murat was granted leave to begin his libel actions before his arguido status was officially lifted.

Meanwhile, I gather breach of secrecy is one matter that will be dealt with in Amaral's crowded schedule of court appointments ...

Poor lamb

[faithlilly]

Ferryman said 'Meanwhile, I gather breach of secrecy is one matter that will be dealt with in Amaral's crowded schedule of court appointments ...'

I understand the McCanns put in a complaint at the time of the Lisbon book banning about this. Where is your evidence that the complaint is being proceeded with ?

[ferryman]

Ferryman said 'Meanwhile, I gather breach of secrecy is one matter that will be dealt with in Amaral's crowded schedule of court appointments ...'

I understand the McCanns put in a complaint at the time of the Lisbon book banning about this. Where is your evidence that the complaint is being proceeded with ?

There's no question he's guilty of it.  Of all people Morais confirmed ...

[AnneGuedes]

Then you presumably don't approve of "sources close to the investigation" leakng to Felicia Cabrita and her Sol articles, or Tal & Qual, 24 Horas, CdaM and whoever else?

One thing is leaking an information, another obtaining an information.

[faithlilly]

There's no question he's guilty of it.  Of all people Morais confirmed ...

But that's not what I asked. Where is your evidence that the complaint was proceeded with ?

[ferryman]

The McCanns couple lawyer, Isabel Duarte, now intends to sue the former coordinator of the PJ, Gonçalo Amaral, for having allegedly violated the secrecy of justice in the Madeleine McCann case.

by Frederico Duarte Carvalho, journalist

Based on the testimony of the publisher of "The Truth of the Lie", Mário Sena Lopes, Isabel Duarte realized that the work would have been delivered to the publisher "Guerra & Paz" before the 21st July 2008, the date of the final dispatch that archived the process. Therefore, Gonçalo Amaral violated the secrecy and must pay for it.

However, at the time that Gonçalo Amaral began working on the project, it was already expected - by the act of the law - that the process would leave the secrecy of justice close to the month of August. But, by coincidence, the process was made public days before the publication of the book - the latter had been edited on the 24th July [the book was released to the public on the 25th, Friday, July 2008].

That is, Gonçalo Amaral was even willing to violate the law of the secrecy of justice and start a media debate on the subject. Except that with the archival made a few days before the launch of the book, Gonçalo Amaral could no longer be accused of violating the secrecy. At most, he could be charged with an attempt to breach the secrecy of justice. And he really tried, but even that was not allowed...


in Para mim tanto faz

[faithlilly]

The McCanns couple lawyer, Isabel Duarte, now intends to sue the former coordinator of the PJ, Gonçalo Amaral, for having allegedly violated the secrecy of justice in the Madeleine McCann case.

by Frederico Duarte Carvalho, journalist

Based on the testimony of the publisher of "The Truth of the Lie", Mário Sena Lopes, Isabel Duarte realized that the work would have been delivered to the publisher "Guerra & Paz" before the 21st July 2008, the date of the final dispatch that archived the process. Therefore, Gonçalo Amaral violated the secrecy and must pay for it.

However, at the time that Gonçalo Amaral began working on the project, it was already expected - by the act of the law - that the process would leave the secrecy of justice close to the month of August. But, by coincidence, the process was made public days before the publication of the book - the latter had been edited on the 24th July [the book was released to the public on the 25th, Friday, July 2008].

That is, Gonçalo Amaral was even willing to violate the law of the secrecy of justice and start a media debate on the subject. Except that with the archival made a few days before the launch of the book, Gonçalo Amaral could no longer be accused of violating the secrecy. At most, he could be charged with an attempt to breach the secrecy of justice. And he really tried, but even that was not allowed...


in Para mim tanto faz

And the evidence Amaral still faces court action over this ?

[ferryman]

Staring you in the face ...

[faithlilly]

Staring you in the face ...

Really ? Do you have anything that isn't already over two years old ?