Author Topic: For Albertini ...  (Read 118689 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #360 on: August 20, 2013, 12:03:54 AM »
I believe it was Astro.

Please provide your correct translations then if you think they are wrong, or withdraw the accusation that the AG report was mistranslated.

You either have evidence to support your assertion or you're making it up, which is it?


I don't think he said what you think he said. wheres his statement in portuguese

this is my assertion ..cut and pasted ... which part isn't 100% true

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #361 on: August 20, 2013, 12:03:58 AM »
No Portugal has given up

Nope, the case is ready to be reopened when new evidence is found.

And the Mccann's status as suspects failing to prove their innocence remains until such time as evidence is found or presented to the PJ which proves their innocence.

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #362 on: August 20, 2013, 12:05:00 AM »

I don't think he said what you think he said. wheres his statement in portuguese

this is my assertion ..cut and pasted ... which part isn't 100% true

Quote
I don't think he said what you think he said

I am not taking that as the truth until you provide evidence to support that assertion.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #363 on: August 20, 2013, 12:05:54 AM »
Nope, the case is ready to be reopened when new evidence is found.

And the Mccann's status as suspects failing to prove their innocence remains until such time as evidence is found or presented to the PJ which proves their innocence.
yes new evidence found and SY have declared MCcANNS  are not suspects.. must have proved there innocence

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #364 on: August 20, 2013, 12:07:03 AM »
I am not taking that as the truth until you provide evidence to support that assertion.

are you as thick as a plank

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #365 on: August 20, 2013, 12:08:01 AM »
are you as thick as a plank

Do you speak Portuguese?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #366 on: August 20, 2013, 12:08:59 AM »
I am not taking that as the truth until you provide evidence to support that assertion.

You want me to provide evidence of what I think... you are as thick as a plank

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #367 on: August 20, 2013, 12:09:14 AM »
yes new evidence found and SY have declared MCcANNS  are not suspects.. must have proved there innocence

What is this evidence? Can you show me?

How do you know they have proven their innocence to SY?

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #368 on: August 20, 2013, 12:11:00 AM »
You want me to provide evidence of what I think... you are as thick as a plank

Er no Mr Goldfish.

You said:

Quote
I don't think he said what you think he said

I said:

Quote
I am not taking that as the truth until you provide evidence to support that assertion.

You see insults don't back up your assertions.

They just make you look, well, daft.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #369 on: August 20, 2013, 12:12:45 AM »
Do you speak Portuguese?
Its written down idiot not an audio tape. Can I read Portuguese..pretty well.... to be able to speak language you need to be using it daily

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #370 on: August 20, 2013, 12:14:06 AM »
Er no Mr Goldfish.

You said:

I said:

You see insults don't back up your assertions.

They just make you look, well, daft....Er no Mr Goldfish.

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #371 on: August 20, 2013, 12:15:50 AM »
Its written down idiot not an audio tape. Can I read Portuguese..pretty well.... to be able to speak language you need to be using it daily

Well you should know that when someone says "do you speak" it also means to be able to read it.

So you don't use it daily but you can read it pretty well, er ok.

Once again, i ask you to provide evidence to support your assertion that the translation i presented from the PJ files is incorrect and what the correct translation should be.

That should be a piece of cake for you if you can read it "pretty well".

I'm waiting....

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #372 on: August 20, 2013, 12:16:14 AM »
Er no Mr Goldfish.

You said:

I said:

You see insults don't back up your assertions.

They just make you look, well, daft....Er no Mr Goldfish.

Have you been on the meths tonight?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #373 on: August 20, 2013, 12:16:18 AM »
What is this evidence? Can you show me?

How do you know they have proven their innocence to SY?


They are not suspects

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #374 on: August 20, 2013, 12:16:57 AM »

They are not suspects

Terrific, has the investigation finished?