Silkywhiskers Full Member
Posts: 280
Watched
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #132 on: February 23, 2014, 10:24:52 PM »
Quote
Eddie told us she died in 5a.
UNQUOTE
----------------------------------------
I have no problem with the dogs - and I have no problem with Grime as a competent trainer.
I do have a problem believing that none of the other apartments or cars had any of the 'odours' in them which Eddie and Keela had been trained to detect. Despite the amount of human traffic constantly passing through them for years on end - not even a single tiny speck of blood has ever been shed in any of them - apparently.
Simply not credible IMO.
...........but don`t your points illustrate that we are not experts?
Do you think that your points will not have already occurred to those with greater knowledge and understanding of the deployment and interpretation of the work of the dogs?
There must be more to it than "statements of the obvious" imo.
All sites / crime scenes for investigation could presumably be well spattered with all manner of historical and recent bodily substances............
It is surely then " not credible" that EVRD`s aren`t alerting and rushing about in an excited state all the time.
How do you explain that they aren`t?..........That they produce results from sites exposed to all those issues of cross-contamination and so forth. The crime scenes/investigation sites aren`t sterile.