Author Topic: The dogs.....  (Read 80059 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #390 on: July 27, 2014, 08:35:38 PM »
no  I understand very well..it is impossible to prove  a false alert ..  when the skull in jersey was found to be  a coconut...was that a false alert

It is an uncobborated alert. That it could not be proven scientifically that a body had lain there at some time does not make it a false positive.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #391 on: July 27, 2014, 08:38:11 PM »
I seem to remember a cadaver dog alerted in the Shannon Mathews case

It did indeed Dave, to a mattress on which someone had died.

Did anyone die in 5a ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #392 on: July 27, 2014, 08:42:11 PM »
It did indeed Dave, to a mattress on which someone had died.

Did anyone die in 5a ?

not that I am aware of..was there ever a cadaver in 5a

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #393 on: July 27, 2014, 09:15:21 PM »
no  I understand very well..it is impossible to prove  a false alert ..  when the skull in jersey was found to be  a coconut...was that a false alert

No, because of the human bones also found.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Benice

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #394 on: July 27, 2014, 09:21:39 PM »
No, because of the human bones also found.


IIRC loads of milk teeth were also found.   Therefore evidence that dogs do alert to body bits from living people - and not just cadavers.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #395 on: July 27, 2014, 09:38:56 PM »

IIRC loads of milk teeth were also found.   Therefore evidence that dogs do alert to body bits from living people - and not just cadavers.

No it doesn't. All it proves is that milk teeth were found at a spot where a cadaver may have lain.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #396 on: July 27, 2014, 10:01:17 PM »
No it doesn't. All it proves is that milk teeth were found at a spot where a cadaver may have lain.

Whether a cadaver may or may not have lain there is just guesswork on your part.

On the other hand - milk teeth were retrieved from there and are the material evidence (no guesswork required) that Eddie had alerted to body parts from living people.


The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #397 on: July 27, 2014, 10:02:29 PM »
Whether a cadaver may or may not have lain there is just guesswork on your part.

On the other hand - milk teeth were retrieved from there and are the material evidence (no guesswork required) that Eddie had alerted to body parts from living people.

...and bones which didn't come from living people....
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #398 on: July 27, 2014, 10:06:44 PM »
Whether a cadaver may or may not have lain there is just guesswork on your part.

On the other hand - milk teeth were retrieved from there and are the material evidence (no guesswork required) that Eddie had alerted to body parts from living people.

No Benice. You are putting two and two together and making five.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #399 on: July 27, 2014, 10:09:26 PM »
...and bones which didn't come from living people....

But which were hundreds of years old IIRC.

How would anyone know without digging down and with no corroborating evidence to prove otherwise -  that an alert in 5A was not to bones buried hundreds of years ago?
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Brietta

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #400 on: July 27, 2014, 10:09:35 PM »
No Benice. You are putting two and two together and making five.

You are adding figures to make 666.

The milk teeth are proof: there is no proof that a corpse may have lain there; therefore there is proof only that the dog alerted to milk teeth.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #401 on: July 27, 2014, 10:11:37 PM »
Whether a cadaver may or may not have lain there is just guesswork on your part.

On the other hand - milk teeth were retrieved from there and are the material evidence *(no guesswork required) that Eddie had alerted to body parts from living people.

*guesswork required here being that the previous owners of said teeth were alive at the time when they & their gnashers parted company.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #402 on: July 27, 2014, 10:15:50 PM »
You are adding figures to make 666.

The milk teeth are proof: there is no proof that a corpse may have lain there; therefore there is proof only that the dog alerted to milk teeth.

Which bit of human bones did you not understand?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Brietta

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #403 on: July 27, 2014, 10:27:24 PM »
Which bit of human bones did you not understand?

-snipped - Detective Superintendent Michael Gradwell said Wednesday that the rooms described as underground punishment chambers where children were beaten and raped were "just cellars." He said bones found at the home dated from between 1470 and 1670, while the alleged shackles were "just rusty metal."
http://metro.co.uk/2008/03/04/jersey-graves-could-be-bergerac-tv-props-23444/

It is also alleged that while filming Bergerac an area which was dug up for a scene depicting a graveyard uncovered a real graveyard and disturbed bones from a real graveyard in the process.
http://metro.co.uk/2008/03/04/jersey-graves-could-be-bergerac-tv-props-23444/

You really should do some research before jumping on a bandwagon.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The dogs.....
« Reply #404 on: July 27, 2014, 10:29:35 PM »
-snipped - Detective Superintendent Michael Gradwell said Wednesday that the rooms described as underground punishment chambers where children were beaten and raped were "just cellars." He said bones found at the home dated from between 1470 and 1670, while the alleged shackles were "just rusty metal."
http://metro.co.uk/2008/03/04/jersey-graves-could-be-bergerac-tv-props-23444/

It is also alleged that while filming Bergerac an area which was dug up for a scene depicting a graveyard uncovered a real graveyard and disturbed bones from a real graveyard in the process.
http://metro.co.uk/2008/03/04/jersey-graves-could-be-bergerac-tv-props-23444/

You really should do some research before jumping on a bandwagon.

You have lost me there, you seem to be agreeing with me?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.