Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3159327 times)

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7410 on: February 05, 2020, 07:52:28 AM »
Thanks for your response Kizzy

But you are just quoting Amarals own excuses as to why he was removed.  Can we have something with some real sources and weight attached instead of Amarals, IMO, fantacies attempting to support himself.


Let's face it, Amarals word doesn't carry much value, does it?   After all he is a convicted purjorer.

So, let's use this logic and apply it elsewhere. If you are found guilty of perjury, but deny it, you lied, end of, and anything you assert subsequently can't be trusted and is probably also a lie? Is that correct?
« Last Edit: February 05, 2020, 07:56:13 AM by The General »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7411 on: February 05, 2020, 08:18:40 AM »
So, let's use this logic and apply it elsewhere. If you are found guilty of perjury, but deny it, you lied, end of, and anything you assert subsequently can't be trusted and is probably also a lie? Is that correct?
Such logic has sustained the McCann critic for many years, and neither has ever been found guilty by a court of lying, just one admission in Kate’s book that they told a lie about the reasons for calling off a day trip.  Apparently this “confession” proves that they are liars full stop, and that nothing they have ever said can be deemed truthful.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2020, 08:21:13 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7412 on: February 05, 2020, 09:05:15 AM »
So, let's use this logic and apply it elsewhere. If you are found guilty of perjury, but deny it, you lied, end of, and anything you assert subsequently can't be trusted and is probably also a lie? Is that correct?
Lying in court as, amaral did is a, serious offence... Particularly as he's a police officer.  It shows he's, willing to lie to make his point and hence untrustworthy

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7413 on: February 05, 2020, 09:57:31 AM »
Lying in court as, amaral did is a, serious offence... Particularly as he's a police officer.  It shows he's, willing to lie to make his point and hence untrustworthy
Thank you. So when Kate and Gerry lied about him being ill.........untrustworthy.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7414 on: February 05, 2020, 09:59:50 AM »
Such logic has sustained the McCann critic for many years, and neither has ever been found guilty by a court of lying, just one admission in Kate’s book that they told a lie about the reasons for calling off a day trip.  Apparently this “confession” proves that they are liars full stop, and that nothing they have ever said can be deemed truthful.
OK, so there's lies and other lies that are OK? And the lies that are OK don't lead to further scrutiny of the truthfulness of subsequent statements? But it depends who's lying? And it depends on whether the person admitted to lying or not?
Pretty convenient.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7415 on: February 05, 2020, 10:01:57 AM »
Thank you. So when Kate and Gerry lied about him being ill.........untrustworthy.

You need to look at things in context

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7416 on: February 05, 2020, 10:04:48 AM »
You need to look at things in context
OK.
But then your bleating about a police officer having to be unimpeachable is too funny for consumption if a child has just been fed to the pigs. How's that for context?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7417 on: February 05, 2020, 10:06:29 AM »
OK.
But then your bleating about a police officer having to be unimpeachable is too funny for consumption if a child has just been fed to the pigs. How's that for context?

There, absolutely no evidence a child was fed to the pigs... More lies

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7418 on: February 05, 2020, 10:12:18 AM »
There, absolutely no evidence a child was fed to the pigs... More lies
I can actually hear the intro to Billie Jean as you moonwalk out of this one.....do...do.......do..do.......do..do......do..do.............
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7419 on: February 05, 2020, 10:14:00 AM »
OK, so there's lies and other lies that are OK? And the lies that are OK don't lead to further scrutiny of the truthfulness of subsequent statements? But it depends who's lying? And it depends on whether the person admitted to lying or not?
Pretty convenient.
And you managed to discern all that from what I wrote?  Wow, twisted. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7420 on: February 05, 2020, 10:15:51 AM »
OK.
But then your bleating about a police officer having to be unimpeachable is too funny for consumption if a child has just been fed to the pigs. How's that for context?
Police officers really should be unimpeachable regardless of the nature of the crimes they are investigating, but I realise you think otherwise and that they should bend the rules to suit themselves.   Glad you're not in charge.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7421 on: February 05, 2020, 10:24:06 AM »
And you managed to discern all that from what I wrote?  Wow, twisted.
Thank you. I get that a lot.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7422 on: February 05, 2020, 10:26:00 AM »
Thank you. I get that a lot.
I'm not surprised. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7423 on: February 05, 2020, 10:34:52 AM »
Police officers really should be unimpeachable regardless of the nature of the crimes they are investigating, but I realise you think otherwise and that they should bend the rules to suit themselves.   Glad you're not in charge.
They should. It's actually part of the Code of Conduct. But they rarely are. I'm an advocate of stress and pressure being applied in certain circumstances, yes. I'm twisted like that. And I've been on the receiving end - and I'm in favour!
By the way, I am in charge.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7424 on: February 05, 2020, 10:35:22 AM »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.