Wandering Off Topic

[G-Unit]

Sorry but your post doesn’t make much sense.  What have I got to make my mind up about?  And as far as the gloaters and goaders are concerned, well Faithlilly made a post gloating that CB was never going to be charged just a few minutes ago.  Happy to provide plenty more examples if you need them.

"gloaters and goaders" is an opinion and that should be made apparent.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Sorry but your post doesn’t make much sense.  What have I got to make my mind up about?  And as far as the gloaters and goaders are concerned, well Faithlilly made a post gloating that CB was never going to be charged just a few minutes ago.  Happy to provide plenty more examples if you need them.

dismissing my posts, pretending you do not understand it, is an old troll and  goad trick. Your hypocrisy is so transparent.

You are happy to accept that CB is guilty without evidence being present. you are happy to spend many hours over the years to say the McCANNS  are not guilty of their daughters disappearance and are being punished by nasty jealous trolls etc even though no crime has been officially claimed with evidence!

You then turn on the same people who say CB may not have committed abduction and murder due to no evidence.

Yes, No,  I don't know, I am absolutly positive, I am unsure.  We can see right through all your posts.

[Vertigo Swirl]

dismissing my posts, pretending you do not understand it, is an old troll and  goad trick. Your hypocrisy is so transparent.

You are happy to accept that CB is guilty without evidence being present. you are happy to spend many hours over the years to say the McCANNS  are not guilty of their daughters disappearance and are being punished by nasty jealous trolls etc even though no crime has been officially claimed with evidence!

You then turn on the same people who say CB may not have committed abduction and murder due to no evidence.

Yes, No,  I don't know, I am absolutly positive, I am unsure.  We can see right through all your posts.

A personal attack, how delightful and how wrong on every count. oh, and liked by the moderator to boot, tsk tsk.

[Vertigo Swirl]

"gloaters and goaders" is an opinion and that should be made apparent.

Of course it’s an opinion, as anyone wilth any sense can see. 

[Mr Gray]

dismissing my posts, pretending you do not understand it, is an old troll and  goad trick. Your hypocrisy is so transparent.

You are happy to accept that CB is guilty without evidence being present. you are happy to spend many hours over the years to say the McCANNS  are not guilty of their daughters disappearance and are being punished by nasty jealous trolls etc even though no crime has been officially claimed with evidence!

You then turn on the same people who say CB may not have committed abduction and murder due to no evidence.

Yes, No,  I don't know, I am absolutly positive, I am unsure.  We can see right through all your posts.

Just so its clear for you...I havent seen any poster here claim CB is guilty....but hes the prime suspect now and there may or may not be enough evidence to charge him...we dont know...that includes you

[Miss Taken Identity]

Sorry but your post doesn’t make much sense.  What have I got to make my mind up about?  And as far as the gloaters and goaders are concerned, well Faithlilly made a post gloating that CB was never going to be charged just a few minutes ago.  Happy to provide plenty more examples if you need them.

"gloaters and goaders are concerned, well Faithlilly made a post gloating that CB was never going to be charged"

insulting Faith tsk tks you should know better than to personally attack a fellow poster. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Just so its clear for you...I havent seen any poster here claim CB is guilty....but hes the prime suspect now and there may or may not be enough evidence to charge him...we dont know...that includes you

Yes, I would challenge Miss Taken to supply a cite of me claiming CB is guilty, but of course she won’t because there isn’t one.  It’s hilarious though that the moderator gave her abusive unsubstantiated post the thumbs up, the moderator who claims to disapprove of abusive posts.

[Vertigo Swirl]

"gloaters and goaders are concerned, well Faithlilly made a post gloating that CB was never going to be charged"

insulting Faith tsk tks you should know better than to personally attack a fellow poster. 

She doesn’t mind, it says so in her avatar, so no harm done.

[Miss Taken Identity]

She doesn’t mind, it says so in her avatar, so no harm done.

I am offended on her behalf... so that has some count  . My post was not abusive it stated a few facts. just sit still for a few hours the bruising will ease. Best known cure for bruised ego.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I am offended on her behalf... so that has some count  . My post was not abusive it stated a few facts. just sit still for a few hours the bruising will ease. Best known cure for bruised ego.

Good goad, good goad, got anymore...?

[mrswah]

Just so its clear for you...I havent seen any poster here claim CB is guilty....but hes the prime suspect now and there may or may not be enough evidence to charge him...we dont know...that includes you

We certainly can't say he's guilty. My own feeling is that the German police do have some kind of  evidence against him: I see no reason for them to lie. However, they obviously don't have enough to charge him, or they would have done so by now.  He doesn't have a good record, but , at the moment, we can't say he abducted Madeleine, or was connected with her disappearance.

[mrswah]

Please could posters try to treat each other politely on this thread. It really isn't difficult to do!!

Thanks.

[sadie]

We certainly can't say he's guilty. My own feeling is that the German police do have some kind of  evidence against him: I see no reason for them to lie. However, they obviously don't have enough to charge him, or they would have done so by now.  He doesn't have a good record, but , at the moment, we can't say he abducted Madeleine, or was connected with her disappearance.

I have been saying this for a long time.

I do think that he is likely to be involved in some way because of
1)  Things that we are told he has said 
2)  Other things that have been said by (ex) friends.
3)  His sexually depraved appetite
4)  His climbing and breaking in abilities
5)  His record
6)  Videos and photos   
[ But I ask myself, "where the videos and photos planted"? ….. because The traffickers want a Patsy?.   And They want Madeleine believed dead at the hand of CB and then they can carry on unhindered in their immensely money making trafficking business, allied, I expect to blackmail and extortion]

BUT, WE JUST DON'T KNOW, so I agree with mrswah.   


As far as I am concerned at the moment, despite all the seeming pointers, CB might or might not be involved in the abduction of Madeleine.   Or he might be a patsy for The Traffickers

[Myster]

I have been saying this for a long time.

I do think that he is likely to be involved in some way because of
1)  Things that we are told he has said 
2)  Other things that have been said by (ex) friends.
3)  His sexually depraved appetite
4)  His climbing and breaking in abilities
5)  His record
6)  Videos and photos   
[ But I ask myself, "where the videos and photos planted"? ….. because The traffickers want a Patsy?.   And They want Madeleine believed dead at the hand of CB and then they can carry on unhindered in their immensely money making trafficking business, allied, I expect to blackmail and extortion]

BUT, WE JUST DON'T KNOW, so I agree with mrswah.   


As far as I am concerned at the moment, despite all the seeming pointers, CB might or might not be involved in the abduction of Madeleine.   Or he might be a patsy for The Traffickers

I don't think so.  Whilst he was jailed, Brueckner asked his friend(s) to remove these items (videos specifically, and maybe computer HDDs, cameras, etc.) from one of his PdL lairs and then make it look like someone had broken into the property.  Why would he do that if the material wasn't incriminating?

[barrier]

I don't think so.  Whilst he was jailed, Brueckner asked his friend(s) to remove these items (videos specifically, and maybe computer HDDs, cameras, etc.) from one of his PdL lairs and then make it look like someone had broken into the property.  Why would he do that if the material wasn't incriminating?

This supposedly incriminating evidence is where, it's all bollex, dupers delight.