Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3009568 times)

0 Members and 98 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9510 on: February 21, 2021, 01:14:16 PM »
Did that go for Brenda too?  *%87

This is a disgraceful Comment.

Offline Myster

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9511 on: February 21, 2021, 01:18:51 PM »
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9512 on: February 21, 2021, 01:23:07 PM »
This is a disgraceful Comment.

The answer was equally reprehensible.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9513 on: February 21, 2021, 01:25:06 PM »
The answer was equally reprehensible.
()678% still reading me then?  Good news! 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9514 on: February 21, 2021, 01:26:13 PM »
Yup.

I take it you don't believe in free speech unless it is your own?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9515 on: February 21, 2021, 01:27:04 PM »
This is a disgraceful Comment.

Why?   It was a genuine observation.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9517 on: February 21, 2021, 01:29:38 PM »
I take it you don't believe in free speech unless it is your own?
How do you figure that out then?  Do tell.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor


Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9519 on: February 21, 2021, 01:47:17 PM »
How do you figure that out then?  Do tell.

You agreed with the post suggesting that people who stick their heads above the parapet should be shot at.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9520 on: February 21, 2021, 01:49:25 PM »
You agreed with the post suggesting that people who stick their heads above the parapet should be shot at.
There's no such thing as total free speech.. It has limits... As we are constantly reminded

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9521 on: February 21, 2021, 01:49:40 PM »
He accused them of criminal acts. Can you not see that

He documented the progress of the investigation up to September 2007, which suspected them of criminal acts and made them arguidos. The investigators suspected them primarily of occultation of a body and simulation of a kidnapping, and Amaral agreed.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9522 on: February 21, 2021, 01:51:59 PM »
You agreed with the post suggesting that people who stick their heads above the parapet should be shot at.
Yes, what's the problem?  Did you think I meant literally?  Perhaps I need to explain.  If you pipe up with controversial or hateful views, expect those hateful or controversial views to be critiqued in the strongest terms by way of reply.   That's just freedom of speech in action. 

What IS reprehensible is dragging Brenda into a discussion that was nothing to do with her - stop weaponising her name to try and score points in a discussion online, it's not nice.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2021, 01:58:53 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9523 on: February 21, 2021, 01:53:17 PM »
He documented the progress of the investigation up to September 2007, which suspected them of criminal acts and made them arguidos. The investigators suspected them primarily of occultation of a body and simulation of a kidnapping, and Amaral agreed.

Who else wrote a book?  Oh Yes, Amaral's convicted criminal oppo Cristavao

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9524 on: February 21, 2021, 01:53:32 PM »
He documented the progress of the investigation up to September 2007, which suspected them of criminal acts and made them arguidos. The investigators suspected them primarily of occultation of a body and simulation of a kidnapping, and Amaral agreed.

I think you need to read his book and watch the video. The investigation suspected them... Amaral said he could prove it... Can you really not see the difference. He also said things that were not in the files