Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

How about between 5.30pm and 8.30pm?

Yes, let's talk about that.  It obviously excludes an accident with both parents not present so we'd have to come up with a jolly good motive for a cover up. Do carry on....

[G-Unit]

If Operation Grange had stumbled upon a key piece of evidence that pointed incontrovertibly to the McCanns do sceptics here believe they would have buried it?  If so, why?  Surely solving this case would be their top priority, not protecting the McCanns, unless anyone can give a very good reason why the latter would be more important than the former?

Which bit of being told what they could look at and what they could not didn't you understand? My impression of Grange's focus was that they searched the evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor.

[Eleanor]

Which bit of being told what they could look at and what they could not didn't you understand? My impression of Grange's focus was that they searched the evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor.

I don't think I believe this.  At least not in the context in which you have presented it.  In My Opinion.

[G-Unit]

Yes, let's talk about that.  It obviously excludes an accident with both parents not present so we'd have to come up with a jolly good motive for a cover up. Do carry on....

If something happened and was covered up there was a motive regardless of the time.

[sadie]

Editted:

Angelos post about my theory and Jesus has been wiped.  Some of you will have seen it.   I wonder why it has now gone.

Please remember that I referred to historical figures such as John the Baptist and Robert de Brus as well.  Now Robert de Brus had his Historical seat is in Brussels at Molenbeek St John.   Some on here, who are sleuths by nature, might find that interesting.   With most it will fly right over their heads 

Or they will prefer not to know.

[faithlilly]

I don't think I believe this.  At least not in the context in which you have presented it.  In My Opinion.

How do you explain OG remit then? Shouldn’t it read disappearance rather than abduction?

With the remit and Colin Sutton’s claim I’m afraid there is no other explanation.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Which bit of being told what they could look at and what they could not didn't you understand? My impression of Grange's focus was that they searched the evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor.

What a rude post.  I am perfectly able understand everything you have written thank you.
You seem to be saying that even if Operation Grange HAD stumbled across evidence that pointed strongly at the parents they would avert their gaze from it.  In other words that they would be complicit in the cover up.  Is this a correct interpretation of your view?

[Mr Gray]

Which bit of being told what they could look at and what they could not didn't you understand? My impression of Grange's focus was that they searched the evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor.

I thought it was a Portuguese investigation... What have they been doing

[Mr Gray]

Please remember that I referred to historical figures such as John the Baptist and Robert de Brus as well.  Now Robert de Brus had his Historical seat is in Brussels at Molenbeek St John.   Some on here, who are sleuths by nature, might find that interesting.   With most it will fly right over their heads 

Or they will prefer not to know.

I'm pointing out that you haven't been proven wrong

[sadie]

I'm pointing out that you haven't been proven wrong

Sorry, Davel.  I wasn't referring to your post, but to Angelos about Jesus.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If something happened and was covered up there was a motive regardless of the time.

I'm asking what would be a motive for a cover up if one or both parents were there.  Covering up an accident can be ruled out can it not?  Unless you can explain why an accident which happens in the presence of a parent would result in them deciding it was necessary to cover it up.  What sort of an accident would it be that resulted in near instantaneous death that would reflect so badly on the parent(s) present that hiding the accident from the authorities would be preferable?   And then we have to consider how two parents could conspire to hatch a cover up plot and then go out to dinner seemingly both completely relaxed and untroubled, leaving their dead child in an unlocked apartment, quite happy for their friends to go and check on her and her siblings in their beds.  Unless you think Madeleine wasn't left in her bed but stuffed behind the sofa instead?  Which might look a bit strange to anyone checking on the kids well-being, unless of course the friends had been briefed that Madeleine was actually dead so don't be too alarmed that she's not in bed but behind the sofa? 

[Mr Gray]

Sorry, Davel.  I wasn't referring to your post, but to Angelos about Jesus.

No problem Sadie

[Mr Gray]

How do you explain OG remit then? Shouldn’t it read disappearance rather than abduction?

With the remit and Colin Sutton’s claim I’m afraid there is no other explanation.

The other explanation was that its a Portuguese investigation and they decide who and who cannot be questioned in Portugal. The officer didn't mention the McCanns to Sutton

[Angelo222]

Editted:

Angelos post about my theory and Jesus has been wiped.  Some of you will have seen it.   I wonder why it has now gone.

Please remember that I referred to historical figures such as John the Baptist and Robert de Brus as well.  Now Robert de Brus had his Historical seat is in Brussels at Molenbeek St John.   Some on here, who are sleuths by nature, might find that interesting.   With most it will fly right over their heads 

Or they will prefer not to know.

Interesting history Sadie but not very relevant imo.

[Angelo222]

What a rude post.  I am perfectly able understand everything you have written thank you.
You seem to be saying that even if Operation Grange HAD stumbled across evidence that pointed strongly at the parents they would avert their gaze from it.  In other words that they would be complicit in the cover up.  Is this a correct interpretation of your view?

Haven't they already cast a convenient blind eye to criminality?