Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3154813 times)

0 Members and 109 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9915 on: May 06, 2021, 03:16:58 PM »
I am keen for people to stop spreading falsehoods, what's the point in spreading these untruths can we just accept the fact that dog alerts have been used as evidence in court cases in the UK and overseas. I told you many months ago what my take on the alerts is, cut and paste from reply 37 - Dog Alerts - Evidence or Not?

“The dogs alerts are evidence that the dogs alerted in the flat where a missing child was last seen.
Nothing more than that.”
Well no, they're a bit more than that in the case of the hire car aren't they, as the child was never in the hire car was she?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9916 on: May 06, 2021, 03:17:32 PM »
So basically the dog alerts are evidence that the dogs alerted.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9917 on: May 06, 2021, 03:17:39 PM »
Unfortunately Eddie was taught too many tricks, so in the end no one including Martin Grime knew exactly what Eddie was alerting to.

Thats your opinion, mine is Grime knew his dogs very well.
PS. why did you edit my post to Davel?

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9918 on: May 06, 2021, 03:18:21 PM »
Can you supply the guidelines for Scotland please?

No.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9919 on: May 06, 2021, 03:18:57 PM »
So basically the dog alerts are evidence that the dogs alerted.

Yes.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9920 on: May 06, 2021, 03:19:51 PM »
Well no, they're a bit more than that in the case of the hire car aren't they, as the child was never in the hire car was she?

We don't know that do we?

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9921 on: May 06, 2021, 03:20:53 PM »
A Cite would be appropriate for this Statement.  Thank you in advance.

Which statement do you want a cite for there are 2 in the post?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9922 on: May 06, 2021, 03:22:19 PM »
Which statement do you want a cite for there are 2 in the post?

Both would be good.  Thank you.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9923 on: May 06, 2021, 03:31:39 PM »
Both would be good.  Thank you.

You want a cite for the statement that the judicial process makes the laws and  follow guidelines?
I will add a IMO to the post or you can delete it. Who do you think is responsible for law making?
When I refer to the Judiciary I am referring to the whole system of law. It is separate from the Executive and legislature.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9924 on: May 06, 2021, 03:37:35 PM »
You want a cite for the statement that the judicial process makes the laws and  follow guidelines?
I will add a IMO to the post or you can delete it. Who do you think is responsible for law making?
When I refer to the Judiciary I am referring to the whole system of law. It is separate from the Executive and legislature.

An "In My Opinion" will do almost as well.  But a Cite of The Guidelines would be better.  We are all happy to learn something or another.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9925 on: May 06, 2021, 03:41:37 PM »
An "In My Opinion" will do almost as well.  But a Cite of The Guidelines would be better.  We are all happy to learn something or another.

To be clear I have never seen any guidelines from Scotland but it is my opinion that guidelines regarding admission of evidence and any other things pertinent to existing law are applied when considering amendments to law or new laws to be passed. IMO

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9926 on: May 06, 2021, 03:46:05 PM »
To be clear I have never seen any guidelines from Scotland but it is my opinion that guidelines regarding admission of evidence and any other things pertinent to existing law are applied when considering amendments to law or new laws to be passed. IMO

Thank You.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9927 on: May 06, 2021, 03:57:01 PM »
Martin Grime is an expert dog handler who as a police officer would I believe, fulfil all the necessary requirements of his job.

As a dog handler he was one reputedly one of the best. As an expert on legal matters, not so much.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9928 on: May 06, 2021, 04:05:06 PM »
We don't know that do we?
No we don't, but the dog alerted and that's evidence that the dog alerted so what can we deduce from that?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9929 on: May 06, 2021, 04:10:27 PM »
To be clear I have never seen any guidelines from Scotland but it is my opinion that guidelines regarding admission of evidence and any other things pertinent to existing law are applied when considering amendments to law or new laws to be passed. IMO
That's all well and good but surely as part of the judicial process in deciding whether or not dog alerts should be admissable these have to be subjected to scientific testing or at least expert opinion as judges and legal bods are not usually well versed in canine olfactory science or the art of search dog handling, so do they not have to seek advice from erm...people like Martin Grime?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".