Wandering Off Topic

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

I’ve read what Jim Gamble has said about the case.  I’m surprised you set any store by his opinion as he is quite clear that in his the parents had nothing to do with it.  How do you account for this, if you consider him worth reading?

Because like him I’m open minded. He accepts that relationships change, there are scientific advances and new evidence might be found to prove him wrong (or rather right to consider parental involvement as the place to start)

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Who said that Gerry was gone for half an hour?

We need to know this.

They were MW employees. I named them in the timeline revisited thread.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because like him I’m open minded. He accepts that relationships change, there are scientific advances and new evidence might be found to prove him wrong (or rather right to consider parental involvement as the place to start)

I’ve never seen him say that he thinks scientific advances might prove him wrong, do you have a cite?

[G-Unit]

Who said that Gerry was gone for half an hour?

We need to know this.

SVETLANA
-------  STARIKOVA VITORINO (Russian citizen, with the telephone No "96635 ####) - kitchen assistant:
- Said that, yesterday, one individual, purportedly the father of the missing, left the dinner table where a group of friends (in number 8 or 9), for about 30 minutes. After having returned, a woman whom she believed to be his wife, also left the table, there having passed a few moments, all the guests left the table in question, except one elderly lady, who told her [Svetlana's] colleagues that that child had disappeared.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAPAS-EMPLOYEES.htm

[Eleanor]

SVETLANA
-------  STARIKOVA VITORINO (Russian citizen, with the telephone No "96635 ####) - kitchen assistant:
- Said that, yesterday, one individual, purportedly the father of the missing, left the dinner table where a group of friends (in number 8 or 9), for about 30 minutes. After having returned, a woman whom she believed to be his wife, also left the table, there having passed a few moments, all the guests left the table in question, except one elderly lady, who told her [Svetlana's] colleagues that that child had disappeared.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAPAS-EMPLOYEES.htm

So when exactly did Gerry leave the table for about 30 minutes?

And who was the other witness?

[Mr Gray]

Because like him I’m open minded. He accepts that relationships change, there are scientific advances and new evidence might be found to prove him wrong (or rather right to consider parental involvement as the place to start)

Do you seriously think posters such as myself are not open minded... You could not be more wrong

[Vertigo Swirl]

So when exactly did Gerry leave the table for about 30 minutes?

And who was the other witness?

Ever tried nailing jelly to a wall?  Easier than getting an opinion about what happened from G-Unit.  IMO. 

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

I’ve never seen him say that he thinks scientific advances might prove him wrong, do you have a cite?

Jim Gamble:

"I  genuinely believe that either a prompt to someone’s conscience or the advances in modern technology will take us to a point in my lifetime where we find out what happened to Madeleine.

    I absolutely believe that. If this involves an abductor, someone will have seen something.

    Someone will have suspected something and for personal loyalty perhaps, a relationship, or whatever else – the fact that they’ve been unsure, they’ll have kept that to themselves.

    But as time goes on, relationships change and people who’ve done things have life changing experiences that make them feel the need to tell. I think that can happen.

    But I also think there are advances in technology could also lead us down a different path and that might be what breaks the case."

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Ever tried nailing jelly to a wall?  Easier than getting an opinion about what happened from G-Unit.  IMO.

The other witness was Batista

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Do you seriously think posters such as myself are not open minded... You could not be more wrong

I've already told you that I believe your posts are rational and considered 

[Eleanor]

The other witness was Baptiste.

Who is Baptiste and what did he say?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Jim Gamble:

"I  genuinely believe that either a prompt to someone’s conscience or the advances in modern technology will take us to a point in my lifetime where we find out what happened to Madeleine.

    I absolutely believe that. If this involves an abductor, someone will have seen something.

    Someone will have suspected something and for personal loyalty perhaps, a relationship, or whatever else – the fact that they’ve been unsure, they’ll have kept that to themselves.

    But as time goes on, relationships change and people who’ve done things have life changing experiences that make them feel the need to tell. I think that can happen.

    But I also think there are advances in technology could also lead us down a different path and that might be what breaks the case."

No hint there that he thinks he may be proven wrong by technological advances.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The other witness was Baptiste.

That wasn’t the question I was referring to.

[misty]

Because like him I’m open minded. He accepts that relationships change, there are scientific advances and new evidence might be found to prove him wrong (or rather right to consider parental involvement as the place to start)

Do you think the DNA testing is like an Indy Referendum - keep repeating the process until you get the answer you want? What do you think Perlin could achieve which Eurofins cannot?

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

That wasn’t the question I was referring to.

Sorry it was Eleanor who asked for that.