Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

The question of the window has certainly not been resolved in my opinion. I'm more than happy to listen to well researched argument and the presentation of information. I just haven't seen anything on this forum to support the theory that CB was involved, nor have I seen any concrete evidence of rare stranger abduction, No-one on this forum has even successfully accounted for "Smithman". Yet there's a strong conviction from the "pro McCann" posters that CB is 100% guilty based on the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence that is in the public domain.

Then there's the dogs... Unless grime encouraged the cadaver dog to alert.. Then Maddie died in the apartment.. But Wolters almost certainly has proof she didn't.. Lol

[Vertigo Swirl]

The question of the window has certainly not been resolved in my opinion. I'm more than happy to listen to well researched argument and the presentation of information. I just haven't seen anything on this forum to support the theory that CB was involved, nor have I seen any concrete evidence of rare stranger abduction, No-one on this forum has even successfully accounted for "Smithman". Yet there's a strong conviction from the "pro McCann" posters that CB is 100% guilty based on the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence that is in the public domain.

That is simply untrue.

[Eleanor]

That is simply untrue.

Yes, It is untrue.

[Mr Gray]

Yes, It is untrue.

It is untrue... Blly is wrong and he might ask himself if he's got this wrong what else is he wrong about

[Eleanor]

It is untrue... Blly is wrong and he might ask himself if he's got this wrong what else is he wrong about

Perhaps Billy Wizz assumes opinions that aren't actually here.  There's a lot of that about on this Forum.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps Billy Wizz assumes opinions that aren't actually here.  There's a lot of that about on this Forum.

I genuinely don't know a single "Pro" that has claimed to be 100% certain that CB is the person who took Madeleine.  As far as I'm concerned I would go for 60%-80% certain which I know in some quarters means "absolutely certain without any shadow of a doubt"... 

[Eleanor]

I genuinely don't know a single "Pro" that has claimed to be 100% certain that CB is the person who took Madeleine.  As far as I'm concerned I would go for 60%-80% certain which I know in some quarters means "absolutely certain without any shadow of a doubt"... 

Ah, well, that's hypocrisy for you.  And there's a lot of that as well.

[Mr Gray]

The question of the window has certainly not been resolved in my opinion. I'm more than happy to listen to well researched argument and the presentation of information. I just haven't seen anything on this forum to support the theory that CB was involved, nor have I seen any concrete evidence of rare stranger abduction, No-one on this forum has even successfully accounted for "Smithman". Yet there's a strong conviction from the "pro McCann" posters that CB is 100% guilty based on the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence that is in the public domain.

[jassi]

Perhaps Billy Wizz assumes opinions that aren't actually here. There's a lot of that about on this Forum.

There certain is.
Now who is it who keeps bringing up opinions from CMOMM ?

[Mr Gray]

There certain is.
Now who is it who keeps bringing up opinions from CMOMM ?

Billy's claim isn't anywhere apart from Wolters and his team who have seen the evidence

[G-Unit]

Perhaps Billy Wizz assumes opinions that aren't actually here.  There's a lot of that about on this Forum.

I agree. Far too many assumptions.

[Eleanor]

There certain is.
Now who is it who keeps bringing up opinions from CMOMM ?

G-Unit?  Who else?

And what motivated your question?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree. Far too many assumptions.

Of course assumptions can sometimes be correct, especially when those whose views are being assumed about refuse to either confirm or deny the assumptions.  It's very easy to put people straight as I did above wrt to my views on CB's possible involvement, but some people for some reason prefer the "enigmatic" approach.  Their choice but then they shouldn't be too surprised when people assume what their position is based on their posting history. 

[Mr Gray]

I agree. Far too many assumptions.

Billy is wrong and it looks like you are too.
Saying CB may well be guilty if Wolters, has the evidence he claims is not making an assumption. Saying I think Wolters may well have the evidence is also not an assumption..

[Eleanor]

Billy is wrong and it looks like you are too.
Saying CB may well be guilty if Wolters, has the evidence he claims is not making an assumption. Saying I think Wolters may well have the evidence is also not an assumption..

I of course meant assumptions of the opinions of others.