Wandering Off Topic

[barrier]

Sceptic logic = if the Germans can’t prove CB was in PdL on the night of 3rd May then it proved Madeleine wasn’t abducted.   

Better that than think the sick paedo did for Madeleine.

[barrier]

LOL.

LOL, its catchy ain't it.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters is on record as saying CB cannot be placed there, so its your logic that is screwed.

It's simple... Wolters doesn't have proof he was there.. That doesn't mean he wasn't

[Eleanor]

LOL, its catchy ain't it.

Yay.  Good one.

[G-Unit]

Do you have any evidence he was there though, or must we just presume so out of necessity?

Some people believe Tasmin Silence saw him in his leather jacket.

[Wonderfulspam]

Sceptic logic = if the Germans can’t prove CB was in PdL on the night of 3rd May then it proved Madeleine wasn’t abducted.   

Well, if he wasn't in PDL, then he couldn't have abducted her, and even if he was in PDL, that still isn't evidence he abducted Maddie either.

But, considering the 3 investigative forces, evidence of abduction from apartment by a stranger, 15 years worth of work, one digestive system, etc , how could they possibly be wrong about Brueckner?  There can't be some other paedo abductor guy out there, surely, considering the sheer weight of irrefutable evidence against Brueckner & the zero evidence found against anyone else.

So, it must be Brueckner then, only it isn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

Some people believe Tasmin Silence saw him in his leather jacket.

It's a dead ringer isn't it, minus the buck teeth, dreadlocks & prosthetic thigh.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Better that than think the sick paedo did for Madeleine.

Is that why you prefer to believe her Daddy hid her body after she od’ed on Calpol and fell off the sofa?  I agree that’s a more palatable scenario but guess what?  Madeleine’s disappearance is not a video game and we do not control her fate by preferring one scenario over another.  Children are abducted, raped and murdered in their thousands worldwide every year and it’s necessary to face this harsh reality especially when it is clearly the most logical and plausible explanation for her disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

Is that why you prefer to believe her Daddy hid her body after she od’ed on Calpol and fell off the sofa?  I agree that’s a more palatable scenario but guess what?  Madeleine’s disappearance is not a video game and we do not control her fate by preferring one scenario over another.  Children are abducted, raped and murdered in their thousands worldwide every year and it’s necessary to face this harsh reality especially when it is clearly the most logical and plausible explanation for her disappearance.

Yeah, just ignore the incredulous story about gusting curtains & moving bedroom doors, then abduction becomes a bit more plausible.

Factor that evidence in however, the McCanns own testimony that is, & Brueckner is in the apartment before, hiding somewhere during & still hanging out there after Gerry's check, screwing around with doors & the window for some reason.

[Wonderfulspam]

^^

But we always skip straight past that inconvenience, don't we, & go straight to an uncomplicated abduction theory, excluding the McCanns own wholly accurate & truthful testimony.

[Wonderfulspam]

He crept in through the back door, opened the children's bedroom door further than the McCanns had left it (the very thing which prompted Gerry to actually enter), but, before he could interfere with Maddie, he must have heard Gerry coming up the back steps, or maybe the accomplice watcher signalled to him somehow.
Perhaps Brueckner & his accomplice worked out the plan during the dummy abduction run, that Kate believes happened the night before.

[Wonderfulspam]

Nope, much easier to just say it was an abduction, rather than attempt to explain how it might have gone down, whilst accounting for the McCanns own evidence.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12361.0

[Lace]

Quite. You 'believe' that they investigated the evidence against the McCanns and dismissed it, because you 'believe' that they are experts. You don't know that's what they did.

Of course they dismissed it they are investigating abduction.   They are experts or they wouldn't be detectives.  You are in a time warp you need to get up to date.  It's what makes this forum so boring,  same old thing all the time.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course they dismissed it they are investigating abduction.   They are experts or they wouldn't be detectives.  You are in a time warp you need to get up to date.  It's what makes this forum so boring,  same old thing all the time.

Yeah, that's because the case against 'the abductor' isn't getting anywhere.

[Lace]

Why do some people question Kate about the door slamming shut when a gust of wind blew through the window?  Read the beginning of Amaral's book he said it was windy at night on the 3rd of May.  So do a bit of digging before you mock it makes you look rather silly.