Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

I'm commemting on one video, not on what you refer to as fifteen years of 'hatred and malice'. If that includes pointing out that caring, anxious, careful parents are unlikely to leave small children home alone every evening then I don't see how that can be seen as 'hatred and malice', it's just truthful.

Imo I have no serious problems and if you truly think I have perhaps you need to examine your own attitudes. I've never called the Fund fraudulent, for example, as you seem to be hinting I have.

So, according to your post, there has been only ONE video castigating the McCanns with hatred and malice at its root, over the past fifteen years.

I think you may very well have got that wrong.

I rather think you are mistaken

[Vertigo Swirl]

The supporters think that the PJ's suspicions of the McCanns were unfounded. It's looking more and more like Wolter's suspicions of CB are also unfounded.

Why - simply because charges have yet to be brought?  Since when did the passing of time have a bearing on whether or not suspicions are unfounded?  You have suspected the McCanns for years, doess that mean as every hour ticks by and they are not charged your suspicions become more and more unfounded? 

[kizzy]

Sceptics have been saying the s thing for 15 years

Yes, consistent ....whereas you/others it seems have gone for suspect of the day ..in the past.

[G-Unit]

So, according to your post, there has been only ONE video castigating the McCanns with hatred and malice at its root, over the past fifteen years.

I think you may very well have got that wrong.

I rather think you are mistaken

The video which was posted on here, and which I commented on, did not, imo, have 'hatred and malice at it's root'. It would be helpful if you raised specific examples instead of making generalised statements btw.

[Mr Gray]

Yes, consistent ....whereas you/others it seems have gone for suspect of the day ..in the past.

You are totally wrong as usual.. CB is. he first suspect with claims of real evidence.... The first time I could see the case being solved

[Brietta]

There's a lot of bullying, hatred, malice and abuse on here, no need to generalise about the internet. Interesting, many of the posts made here by the supporters (including moderators) wouldn't be allowed on Websleuths. That forum does indeed make moderation on here look non-existent. 
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg676249;topicseen#msg676249

You still haven't quite got the hang of moderator duties and responsibilities  https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8404.msg680942#msg680942

And what your conversation in the context of the present discussion regarding cyberbullies is all about is a bit of a mystery to me.  You have linked to entirely the wrong post, unless you can point out what you can see which is not there.

Some time ago in another life I posted "It makes the moderation here look non-existent and moderators look like eedjits.
But let's not kid ourselves.  The moderation on CMOMM is very tight indeed.  No doubt rampaging on here is much more amusing 😁

I think your illustration of what you think constitutes cyber bullying when measured against the example you have provided proves nothing other than that you do not know what bullying is, "There's a lot of bullying, hatred, malice and abuse on here, no need to generalise about the internet. Interesting, many of the posts made here by the supporters (including moderators) - since I am the subject of the bullying post to which you replied "It's cyber bullying, a practice she alleges to despise, which is also quite hypocritical, particularly from a moderator." So between the pair of you the perfect example of bullying has been provided.  The sad thing is you were so carried away with grasping the opportunity to get the boot in, you failed to realise how transparent your bullying tactic with me as the focus was, - wouldn't be allowed on Websleuths. That forum does indeed make moderation on here look non-existent."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg676249;topicseen#msg676249

[Brietta]

What is your game and motive B

In your posts, you like to come across as the caring voice of reason yetttt.

Your posts vilify anyone who has a different opinion on the mccs to yours.

Your posts show nothing but contempt for GA....yet don't realize contempt is what a lot of people have for the mccs....and you are no different from them.

YOU have spent years slagging off anyone who is on Maddie's side for justice and don't believe the mccs version.

They have as much right as you to voice their opinion...or to not believe the abduction version.

You should realize they are not bad parents ...they are people who do not believe the mccs version of events.

Yet another example of a bullying post with no substance provided to substantiate the wild personal accusations.

[kizzy]

You are totally wrong as usual.. CB is. he first suspect with claims of real evidence.... The first time I could see the case being solved

You don't know I'm wrong ....... it's just as simple as you think you are right.

So what is the real evidence?

[Brietta]

The video which was posted on here, and which I commented on, did not, imo, have 'hatred and malice at it's root'. It would be helpful if you raised specific examples instead of making generalised statements btw.

I was referring to the evil which is rampant on social media which is damaging to both those who post it and those who are exposed to the content.

The specific to which I responded was reference made by you to the sceptic lexicon which has not altered since Madeleine's abduction more than fifteen years ago.

What is your purpose if for no other reason than berating all her family.

[Mr Gray]

You don't know I'm wrong ....... it's just as simple as you think you are right.

So what is the real evidence?

I know you are wrong if you think I've considered any other suspect as guilty.. CB is the first

[kizzy]

Yet another example of a bullying post with no substance provided to substantiate the wild personal accusations.

How was my post bullying...I would consider that a personal accusation.

If you can't accept what people say about the mccs is not persecution ..not everyone believes Maddie was abducted.

Your posts on the other hand seem to have a hatred for GA. He has done nothing to you....all he was doing was his job.

You dont know if he was wrong.....but he does seem to have more support than the mccs have.

[kizzy]

I know you are wrong if you think I've considered any other suspect as guilty.. CB is the first

So what is this real evidence then?

[Wonderfulspam]

Why - simply because charges have yet to be brought?  Since when did the passing of time have a bearing on whether or not suspicions are unfounded?  You have suspected the McCanns for years, doess that mean as every hour ticks by and they are not charged your suspicions become more and more unfounded?

You're still thinking Brueckner will be charged at some point? That's optimistic. If you're ever left wondering why he still hasn't been charged at any point in the foreseeable future I'll happily explain to you why that is.

[Wonderfulspam]

So what is this real evidence then?

imo People are utterly delusional if they still think Wolters has concrete evidence.

[The General]

imo People are utterly delusional if they still think Wolters has concrete evidence.

What is evidence?
Sum of investigation?
But what is missing?