Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2936204 times)

0 Members and 119 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16020 on: January 28, 2026, 05:15:51 PM »
I suspected them for about 5 minutes when they were made arguidos

That's my point you see........going with the narrative.

like now ........C.B. must be the abductor...because ur told he is.
Absolute nonsense.  When I said I suspected them for about 5 minutes I was hardly exaggerating.  They were arguidos for many, many months whilst I supported their innocence, as I did prior to them being made arguidos when the papers were full of made up stories implying their guilt and therefore counter to the narrative as you put it.  Stop trying to score silly points off me by making up stuff about me allegedly changing my mind alot, it?s   a bit childish.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16021 on: January 28, 2026, 06:00:45 PM »
Absolute nonsense.  When I said I suspected them for about 5 minutes I was hardly exaggerating.  They were arguidos for many, many months whilst I supported their innocence, as I did prior to them being made arguidos when the papers were full of made up stories implying their guilt and therefore counter to the narrative as you put it.  Stop trying to score silly points off me by making up stuff about me allegedly changing my mind alot, it?s   a bit childish.


Thy post - Doth protest too much.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16022 on: January 28, 2026, 08:04:54 PM »

Thy post - Doth protest too much.
And thy posts are full of bullshyte.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16023 on: January 29, 2026, 05:04:38 PM »
And thy posts are full of bullshyte.

Don't you think smutty posts .......show true colours

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16024 on: January 29, 2026, 05:32:57 PM »
Don't you think smutty posts .......show true colours
Tell us more.   I?m sure you have some fascinating insights into the subject. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16025 on: January 29, 2026, 06:38:35 PM »
Tell us more.   I?m sure you have some fascinating insights into the subject.

No ...I never have to use foul language.

Just accept your a poster on a forum with an opinion -  that the mccs are not involved.

That does not prove the mcs wasn't .......or that Maddie was abducted.

Just get off the pedestal your neither a fool or you have more common-sense than other posters who think different to you


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16026 on: January 29, 2026, 07:12:24 PM »
No ...I never have to use foul language.

Just accept your a poster on a forum with an opinion -  that the mccs are not involved.

That does not prove the mcs wasn't .......or that Maddie was abducted.

Just get off the pedestal your neither a fool or you have more common-sense than other posters who think different to you
I definitely have more common sense than people who think the McCanns covered up the death of their daughter and that can be demonstrated by the fact that no one in 18 years has come up with a plausible and rational explanation of how the McCanns dunnit, least of all you. I accept that that is my opinion but I challenge you to prove me wrong.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16027 on: January 29, 2026, 07:53:59 PM »
I definitely have more common sense than people who think the McCanns covered up the death of their daughter and that can be demonstrated by the fact that no one in 18 years has come up with a plausible and rational explanation of how the McCanns dunnit, least of all you. I accept that that is my opinion but I challenge you to prove me wrong.

It's not that there isn't a plausible explanation. It's just that you refuse to accept it. There's a sighting of Gerry, abducting his daughter. If you can't work it out from there then maybe it's just that you don't have as much common sense as you imagine.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16028 on: January 29, 2026, 09:20:52 PM »
It's not that there isn't a plausible explanation. It's just that you refuse to accept it. There's a sighting of Gerry, abducting his daughter. If you can't work it out from there then maybe it's just that you don't have as much common sense as you imagine.
Gerry couldn?t have been seen by the Smiths, I already proved that a few months ago on this forum, shame you can?t accept this.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16029 on: January 30, 2026, 11:39:23 AM »
Absolute nonsense.  When I said I suspected them for about 5 minutes I was hardly exaggerating.  They were arguidos for many, many months whilst I supported their innocence, as I did prior to them being made arguidos when the papers were full of made up stories implying their guilt and therefore counter to the narrative as you put it.  Stop trying to score silly points off me by making up stuff about me allegedly changing my mind alot, it?s   a bit childish.

Can I ask why you suspected them, even for 5 minutes?

Are you prone to jumping to conclusions?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16030 on: January 30, 2026, 03:10:30 PM »
I definitely have more common sense than people who think the McCanns covered up the death of their daughter and that can be demonstrated by the fact that no one in 18 years has come up with a plausible and rational explanation of how the McCanns dunnit, least of all you. I accept that that is my opinion but I challenge you to prove me wrong.

Excuse me..........prove YOU wrong...IMO you are

They have never come up with a plausible and rational abductor either...or any proof of one.

OH. Apart from the current one......... HCW telling you CB abducted Maddie. [5 year later still no proof].

The mccs have never been 100% cleared either.

As for the gauntlet [silly]...what for - a difference of opinion.

Youll be challenging me to handbags at dawn next.

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16031 on: January 30, 2026, 04:58:59 PM »
Excuse me..........prove YOU wrong...IMO you are

They have never come up with a plausible and rational abductor either...or any proof of one.

OH. Apart from the current one......... HCW telling you CB abducted Maddie. [5 year later still no proof].

The mccs have never been 100% cleared either.

As for the gauntlet [silly]...what for - a difference of opinion.

Youll be challenging me to handbags at dawn next.

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16032 on: January 30, 2026, 05:07:35 PM »
They have come up with an abductor.  CB.  He fits the criteria.  The problem they have is its a cold case from 2007.  DNA would have disappeared.  How many coincidences are there -

He matches the  man staring at 5a.  He was seen a few times staring at the property.  He was described perfectly from his acned face to his black leather jacket.

He actually worked in the Tapas Bar and did jobs around the apartments where the McCann's stayed, so he would know his way around the establishment.

He is a Paedophile.

He burgled many apartments.

He was known to the drug world, so would know very unpleasant people.

Video's were found showing abuse against children on his property.

Stories were found where he described abducting a blonde haired little girl.  This alone is enough to prove to me is the abductor.

So apart from the blowing curtains the moving door { which I have explained].  What do you have to convince me it was the McCann's who hid their daughter Madeleine.


Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16033 on: January 30, 2026, 06:02:46 PM »
They have come up with an abductor.  CB.  He fits the criteria.  The problem they have is its a cold case from 2007.  DNA would have disappeared.  How many coincidences are there -

He matches the  man staring at 5a.  He was seen a few times staring at the property.  He was described perfectly from his acned face to his black leather jacket.

He actually worked in the Tapas Bar and did jobs around the apartments where the McCann's stayed, so he would know his way around the establishment.

He is a Paedophile.

He burgled many apartments.

He was known to the drug world, so would know very unpleasant people.

Video's were found showing abuse against children on his property.

Stories were found where he described abducting a blonde haired little girl.  This alone is enough to prove to me is the abductor.

So apart from the blowing curtains the moving door { which I have explained].  What do you have to convince me it was the McCann's who hid their daughter Madeleine.


He actually worked in the Tapas Bar and did jobs around the apartments where the McCann's stayed, so he would know his way around the establishment.

Can you cooperate that as evidence...or is it the Ken Ralph [5 minute fame] chap  version 13 year later

Mr Ralphs - a former community champion in Greater Manchester - himself fled from the UK Portugal with his wife in 2004 when a police blunder led to his name being handed to suspected criminals.

This was after Mr Ralphs had given police information on a gangland murder in which the suspects were cleared, resulting in death threats made against him and putting his family in danger.


I wont bother with the rest...you should not believe everything the media tells you.....its not evidence or proof.

By the way I'm not trying to convince you of anything you just keep convincing yourself from what your told.

But I will say after 5 year investigation...C.B. is walking the streets a free man

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16034 on: January 30, 2026, 06:13:00 PM »
Innocent Until Proven Guilty.

This applies to everyone. Including The McCanns.

Let us not forget this.