Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2935545 times)

0 Members and 133 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16215 on: February 09, 2026, 07:34:46 PM »
So is it generally accepted that the Smith sighting was at 10.00 then, Faith?

Generally yes but by Gerry?s own admission the alarm wasn?t raised until around 10.13-10.15.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16216 on: February 09, 2026, 07:49:53 PM »
Generally yes but by Gerry?s own admission the alarm wasn?t raised until around 10.13-10.15.
FGS, have you got the memory of a goldfish?  Are you still basing your theory on the alarm at 10.13-10.15 when I have already demonstrated the illogicality of your reasoning?  Unbelievable.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16217 on: February 09, 2026, 07:51:11 PM »
Then admitted they left the children unattended!!  So what was the real reason for the friends to cover it up? Nothing at all.  They just love a conspiracy.

Read Diane Webster?s testimony about the twins remaining asleep during all the tumult. She is asked again and again whether the twins remaining asleep was odd and time and time again she said that in her experience as a grandmother it definitely was.

I don?t imagine for a moment that the parents or any of the tapas party regularly drugged their children but perhaps only on this occasion? Kate constantly checking that the twins were breathing ( according to Fiona Payne) but not insisting that they be checked out at hospital. That?s odd especially as she could have had no idea what they may have been given. The fact that one of their children had been injured while they were absent may, legally, have been harmful enough to their careers and reputations but if drugs had also been found at a postmortem can you imagine the consequences. A contrived abduction really was their only choice.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16218 on: February 09, 2026, 07:55:07 PM »
Read Diane Webster?s testimony about the twins remaining asleep during all the tumult. She is asked again and again whether the twins remaining asleep was odd and time and time again she said that in her experience as a grandmother it definitely was.

I don?t imagine for a moment that the parents or any of the tapas party regularly drugged their children but perhaps only on this occasion? Kate constantly checking that the twins were breathing ( according to Fiona Payne) but not insisting that they be checked out at hospital. That?s odd especially as she could have had no idea what they may have been given. The fact that one of their children had been injured while they were absent may, legally, have been harmful enough to their careers and reputations but if drugs had also been found at a postmortem can you imagine the consequences. A contrived abduction really was their only choice.
I think carrying your child?s drugged and dead body through town and chucking it in a bin is probably a bit more harmful to your career don?t you?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16219 on: February 09, 2026, 08:05:21 PM »
No, when the alarm was raised no one knows how far away Madeleine was at that point, where are you getting 500 yards from?
The Smiths (there were 9 of them in total) found out a child had gone missing when they got up the next day, thought the child they saw might have been Madeleine but they did not report their sighting until three weeks later, after they had returned to Ireland.  This is negligent behaviour IMO.  Where they were staying I have no idea but they were walking in the direction of the Ocean Club in the opposite direction to Smithman who was walking towards the beach.
The 500yards comes from wikipedia, Vertigo! Would take ten to fifteen minutes walking at a moderate speed according to the web!
« Last Edit: February 09, 2026, 08:09:53 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16220 on: February 09, 2026, 08:07:59 PM »
Generally yes but by Gerry?s own admission the alarm wasn?t raised until around 10.13-10.15.
May I ask what time you think Maddie died, Faith?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16221 on: February 09, 2026, 08:14:28 PM »
The 500yards comes from wikipedia, Vertigo! Would take ten to fifteen minutes walking at a moderate speed according to the web!
10 to fifteen minutes to walk from where to where?  Can you post the wikipedia link youare referring to?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16222 on: February 09, 2026, 08:43:28 PM »
10 to fifteen minutes to walk from where to where?  Can you post the wikipedia link youare referring to?
Just print in 'Madeleine McCann, Wikipedia' , Vertigo! I dont know how to post links, sorry!
The ten-fifteen minutes is how long it would have taken for Maddies abductor to walk 500 yards from the McCanns apartment to the spot he was seen by the Smiths! Right?  500yards= 10-15 minute walk!
Hence Maddie was 500yards away when the alarm was raised and was abducted between 9.45-9.50.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16223 on: February 09, 2026, 09:02:04 PM »
Of course it would take about five minutes for a kidnapper to stealthily enter the McCanns apartment, subdue[drug Maddie] and leave again!
So 'if' the Smiths saw Maddie at 10.00 then her abductor must have entered the apartment between 9.40- 9.45.
That must have been soon after Matthew whatsname checked on her, although he didn't actually check on her, did he?

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16224 on: February 09, 2026, 09:17:04 PM »
So! If the Smiths did see Maddie at 10.00 and it was Gerry carrying her, then again, he must have left the apartment with Maddie around 9.45!
Is there any evidence that Gerry went to check on Maddie around 9.45?
And of course it means he wouldn't have got back to the tapas bar until about 10.15.
And of course we don't know how much further Maddie was taken after the Smiths saw her?
If it was Gerry, the longer the distance he took before dumping her, the longer it would take to get back obviously!
If it was Bruekner or Eleoner's Yacht owner, they wouldn't be returning at all of course!
« Last Edit: February 09, 2026, 09:31:04 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16225 on: February 09, 2026, 09:30:01 PM »
Just print in 'Madeleine McCann, Wikipedia' , Vertigo! I dont know how to post links, sorry!
The ten-fifteen minutes is how long it would have taken for Maddies abductor to walk 500 yards from the McCanns apartment to the spot he was seen by the Smiths! Right?  500yards= 10-15 minute walk!
Hence Maddie was 500yards away when the alarm was raised and was abducted between 9.45-9.50.
It takes about 5 minutes to walk 500 yards, perhaps a little longer if you?re carrying 20 kilos of child.  So as Kate raised the alarm at shortly after 10pm and Gerry was at the table when she left to do her check at around 10pm and the Smiths saw the man carrying the child at around 10pm it can mean only one thing can?t it?  Can you figure out what it is yet?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16226 on: February 09, 2026, 09:31:19 PM »
So! If the Smiths did see Maddie at 10.00 and it was Gerry carrying her, then again, he must have left the apartment with Maddie around 9.45!
Is there any evidence that Gerry went to check on Maddie around 9.45?
And of course it means he wouldn't have got back to the tapas bar until about 10.15.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Gerry left the table twice that night before the alarm was raised, no.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16227 on: February 09, 2026, 09:35:00 PM »
It takes about 5 minutes to walk 500 yards, perhaps a little longer if you?re carrying 20 kilos of child.  So as Kate raised the alarm at shortly after 10pm and Gerry was at the table when she left to do her check at around 10pm and the Smiths saw the man carrying the child at around 10pm it can mean only one thing can?t it?  Can you figure out what it is yet?
Well yes of course, Vertigo! If Gerry was at the table at 10.00 then he couldn't have been the person seen carrying Maddie 500yards from the apartment at 10.00!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16228 on: February 09, 2026, 09:50:07 PM »
Well yes of course, Vertigo! If Gerry was at the table at 10.00 then he couldn't have been the person seen carrying Maddie 500yards from the apartment at 10.00!

Read the witness statements. Read how many say ?around 10? or ?just after 10? or as with most of the tapas group?s first statements no time at all.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16229 on: February 09, 2026, 10:01:24 PM »
Read the witness statements. Read how many say ?around 10? or ?just after 10? or as with most of the tapas group?s first statements no time at all.
Yes, I will have to get round to reading them, Faith!