Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2952071 times)

0 Members and 68 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16275 on: February 11, 2026, 05:25:24 PM »
Do we know when the Maxwell/Maddie witness went to the police with their evidence, Vertigo?
Which one?  You could try google if you really need to know. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16276 on: February 11, 2026, 05:28:01 PM »
Which one?  You could try google if you really need to know.
The one mentioned in the Epstein files in Kizzy's youtube video!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16277 on: February 11, 2026, 05:56:20 PM »
The one mentioned in the Epstein files in Kizzy's youtube video!
Didn?t they reveal all in the video?  I honestly don?t know why you?re interested, it?s barking up the wrong tree, in fact it?s just barking.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16278 on: February 11, 2026, 06:03:14 PM »
Never heard of this sighting.  The girl just happened to be covering her eye okay.  I've heard about the Victoria Beckham look a like though.  This sighting sounds ridiculous to me. 

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16279 on: February 11, 2026, 06:06:21 PM »
The evidence we know about has been discussed on here for the last 5 years, over and over again.  It is certainly stronger evidence than that which apparently exists for Ghislaine Maxwell?s involvement.  CB has not been charged but that doesn?t mean he didn?t do it, only that there is not strong enough evidence to charge. 
FYI the McCanns are free too and definitely living in a big house in England.  I guess that means they didn?t do it either.

FYI

 The Mcs have not been charged but that doesn't mean they didn't do it, only that there is not strong enough evidence to charge. IMO
« Last Edit: February 11, 2026, 06:10:06 PM by kizzy »

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16280 on: February 11, 2026, 06:14:32 PM »
Oh swerl did I believe CB was the abductor  five year ago No - seems you fell for it hook line n sinker.

The efit for a sighting in 2009 was the double of G. M...I replied to a post anything is possible in this case.

I should imagine by now you know exactly what I believe.........although you always like to twist it.

I beleive and always have.........the mccs know what happened to Maddie.


Why do you think the McCann's know what happened to Madeleine?

Is it because she said 'Someone has taken her' ?

Put yourself in Kates position.  She goes to the apartment the window is open Madeleine is not in her bed.  She quickly searches the room incase Madeleine is hiding from someone.  Madeleine is not in the apartment.  Now being a mother myself the first thing I would think about is that someone came into the bedroom through the window and abducted my child. Wouldn't you?

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16281 on: February 11, 2026, 06:15:37 PM »
Plus I would think it was a Paedophile.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16282 on: February 11, 2026, 06:35:49 PM »
FYI

 The Mcs have not been charged but that doesn't mean they didn't do it, only that there is not strong enough evidence to charge. IMO
Right, so you understand the concept of there not being enough evidence to charge but only when it applies to the McCanns, not Christian Bruckner. Cool.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16283 on: February 11, 2026, 06:39:25 PM »
Never heard of this sighting.  The girl just happened to be covering her eye okay.  I've heard about the Victoria Beckham look a like though.  This sighting sounds ridiculous to me.
What I want to know is - why are there no internet conspiracy theories about Victoria Beckham being involved in Madeleines?s disappearance?  I mean for years it was thought the efit looked like her so why was she never properly investigated, hmmmm?.very fishy imo.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16284 on: February 11, 2026, 08:03:24 PM »

Why do you think the McCann's know what happened to Madeleine?

Is it because she said 'Someone has taken her' ?

Put yourself in Kates position.  She goes to the apartment the window is open Madeleine is not in her bed.  She quickly searches the room incase Madeleine is hiding from someone.  Madeleine is not in the apartment.  Now being a mother myself the first thing I would think about is that someone came into the bedroom through the window and abducted my child. Wouldn't you?

Strange, if that was her first thought, that she didn't bother to call the police & tell them. I mean, personally I think that's the first thing I'd do. And if the difference in language was a problem I'd be straight down to reception myself to demand they call them for me & I'd make sure that they stay on the line until the police arrive & explain the serious nature of the emergency. I'd be giving them all my details, all my child's details & when the police arrive I'd be explaining everything to them. But no, not Kate. After causing a scene at the Tapas she just turns hysterical, punching & banging her fists on walls. Poor Kate she just lost all control & doing the above mentioned was simply beyond her. How sad.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16285 on: February 11, 2026, 08:04:10 PM »
Plus I would think it was a Paedophile.

Based on what? It seems a bit of a mental leap but if that was Kates first thought, why didn't she tell the police That?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16286 on: February 11, 2026, 08:13:07 PM »
Didn?t they reveal all in the video?  I honestly don?t know why you?re interested, it?s barking up the wrong tree, in fact it?s just barking.
Don't get me wrong, Vertigo, i'm not saying you're wrong about Breuckner! I just dont know!
As I was saying to Faith, I just don't know enough about the case yet to take sides with anyone.
The thing is, one comes across all kinds of theories when you're searching the web for info, eg, Ghislaine Maxwell, and obviously you give it a read or a watch no matter how barking it may be!
In other words, I didn't post about Maxwell to try and undermine anyone's scenario, I was just putting forward the possibility and asking questions.
Besides, there is only one thing we know for sure regarding Madeleine McCann, and that is, she was reported missing in 2007 and has never been seen since!

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16287 on: February 11, 2026, 08:17:42 PM »
And you think this is stronger evidence than there is against CB?

What is that stronger evidence then against CB...........

Considering he has never been charged with anything to do with Maddie.

Is now a free man .....probably by now living in a council property in Germany.

The evidence against CB is top secret Kizzy. But if you knew what evidence Wolters has, you would be in no doubt. That's what he said anyway. After also declaring he believed there was enough evidence to charge. But that was a long time ago now. CB has been found not guilty of everything Wolters tried to throw at him so far, so I doubt he is losing too much sleep over the issue really.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16288 on: February 11, 2026, 08:19:23 PM »
Based on what? It seems a bit of a mental leap but if that was Kates first thought, why didn't she tell the police That?
May I ask what day and time you think Maddie died, Spam?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16289 on: February 11, 2026, 08:23:49 PM »
Don't get me wrong, Vertigo, i'm not saying you're wrong about Breuckner! I just dont know!
As I was saying to Faith, I just don't know enough about the case yet to take sides with anyone.
The thing is, one comes across all kinds of theories when you're searching the web for info, eg, Ghislaine Maxwell, and obviously you give it a read or a watch no matter how barking it may be!
In other words, I didn't post about Maxwell to try and undermine anyone's scenario, I was just putting forward the possibility and asking questions.
Besides, there is only one thing we know for sure regarding Madeleine McCann, and that is, she was reported missing in 2007 and has never been seen since!
I?ve barely mentioned Bruckner recently.  My recent discussion was all about whether or not Gerry could possibly be Smithman.  I think I have demonstrated that that would have been virtually impossible.  I don?t think Smithman was Bruckner either.  Or Ghislaine Maxwell for that matter!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".