Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2927221 times)

0 Members and 170 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16410 on: February 13, 2026, 02:37:05 PM »
Much less, evidence Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger. 19 years & millions of pounds spent & the three expert investigative forces are still completely unable to prove that the McCanns didn't do it. But let's not be too hasty, let's give them all another two decades & see if they have any luck with the issue after that.
Let's put this case to one side for a moment - do you understand that in some cases police aren't able to amass sufficient concrete evidence to ensure a successful conviction against a suspect even though they are pretty certain they have got the right man and that is why some cases remain unsolved? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16411 on: February 13, 2026, 02:53:29 PM »
Which was dismissed as a possibility by every police force investigating the disappearance.  Why do you think that is?  Instructions from the High Ups maybe?

Instructions from the High Ups maybe?

Possibility isnt it...........You have only to look at the cover ups going on at the moment.

Seems easy to do...when your a High Up.


One of the most extraordinary features of the Madeleine McCann case is the huge number of government and embassy officials, secret service and security staff, public relations officers,  lawyers, private agencies with government contracts and assorted others who descended on Praia da Luz in the first week after Madeleine McCann was reported missing.

What was it about this reported disappearance of a 3-year-old British girl which appeared to trigger an action little short of panic from so many high-level people?




Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16412 on: February 13, 2026, 03:01:23 PM »
Instructions from the High Ups maybe?

Possibility isnt it...........You have only to look at the cover ups going on at the moment.

Seems easy to do...when your a High Up.


One of the most extraordinary features of the Madeleine McCann case is the huge number of government and embassy officials, secret service and security staff, public relations officers,  lawyers, private agencies with government contracts and assorted others who descended on Praia da Luz in the first week after Madeleine McCann was reported missing.

What was it about this reported disappearance of a 3-year-old British girl which appeared to trigger an action little short of panic from so many high-level people?

Yes but did the McCanns ever get flown out on a private jet to Epstein's Island?  I bet they did, don't you?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16413 on: February 13, 2026, 03:05:20 PM »
Let's put this case to one side for a moment - do you understand that in some cases police aren't able to amass sufficient concrete evidence to ensure a successful conviction against a suspect even though they are pretty certain they have got the right man and that is why some cases remain unsolved?

Yes. I understand that the police can't prove the McCanns did it. But they also can't prove that they didn't.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Uncle Jr

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16414 on: February 13, 2026, 03:15:58 PM »
Yes. I understand that the police can't prove the McCanns did it. But they also can't prove that they didn't.
I suppose that does work both ways.
I don't understand how Herr Wolters' evidence hasn't been leaked in some way. I would have thought that, with all they eyes that have been on it, someone would have been tempted by the press, for example.
Unless the evidence is already in the pubmic domain.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16415 on: February 13, 2026, 03:24:13 PM »
I suppose that does work both ways.
I don't understand how Herr Wolters' evidence hasn't been leaked in some way. I would have thought that, with all they eyes that have been on it, someone would have been tempted by the press, for example.
Unless the evidence is already in the pubmic domain.

He hasn't shared the death evidence with the McCanns either. They are still talking of hope for Madeleine. Or, maybe he has shared the concrete murder evidence with the McCanns (yeah right), buts its really not as convincing as the silly little man has claimed.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16416 on: February 13, 2026, 03:27:02 PM »
Yes but did the McCanns ever get flown out on a private jet to Epstein's Island?  I bet they did, don't you?

No .......you know I don't,

They soon bolted from Portugal though didn't they when made suspects.

That's when Smith first saw gmc carrying twin off plane ...same way as the man who passed him that night carrying a child

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16417 on: February 13, 2026, 03:32:16 PM »
No .......you know I don't,

They soon bolted from Portugal though didn't they when made suspects.

That's when Smith first saw gmc carrying twin off plane ...same way as the man who passed him that night carrying a child

No Smithman definitely wasn't Gerry, Kizzy. Just because he had the same face as Gerry, wore the same trousers as him & was carrying a Madeleine lookalike, that doesn't mean it was Gerry. It could have been Brueckner, wearing a Gerry mask as his disguise. It was all part of the plan.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16418 on: February 13, 2026, 03:40:06 PM »
Yes. I understand that the police can't prove the McCanns did it. But they also can't prove that they didn't.
So (unless you are completely thick) you will understand that the police haven't been able to prove that Bruckner did it, whilst also believing quite firmly based on the evidence they have gathered that he did.  Being unable to gather the requisite evidence against a suspect doesn't prove they didn't do it.  You also obviously need reminding that the the McCanns haven't been police suspects since 2008, aren't being investigated now and almost certainly never will be again. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16419 on: February 13, 2026, 03:41:27 PM »
No Smithman definitely wasn't Gerry, Kizzy. Just because he had the same face as Gerry, wore the same trousers as him & was carrying a Madeleine lookalike, that doesn't mean it was Gerry. It could have been Brueckner, wearing a Gerry mask as his disguise. It was all part of the plan.
afaik no one here has claimed it was Bruckner, stop being a silly billy.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16420 on: February 13, 2026, 03:46:16 PM »
No .......you know I don't,

They soon bolted from Portugal though didn't they when made suspects.

That's when Smith first saw gmc carrying twin off plane ...same way as the man who passed him that night carrying a child
Do you think the McCanns are so important that the High Ups had to get involved to cover for them?  If so, why do you think that might be?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16421 on: February 13, 2026, 03:49:17 PM »
I suppose that does work both ways.
I don't understand how Herr Wolters' evidence hasn't been leaked in some way. I would have thought that, with all they eyes that have been on it, someone would have been tempted by the press, for example.
Unless the evidence is already in the pubmic domain.
There are many examples of historic cases in which full disclosure of the evidence was not made until the trial many years later.   It's common practice not to release everything into the public domain before a case is solved, in fact it's very uncommon for case files to be released to the public as they were in this case, uncommon and highly unprofessional and unethical imo.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16422 on: February 13, 2026, 03:55:56 PM »
So (unless you are completely thick) you will understand that the police haven't been able to prove that Bruckner did it, whilst also believing quite firmly based on the evidence they have gathered that he did.  Being unable to gather the requisite evidence against a suspect doesn't prove they didn't do it.  You also obviously need reminding that the the McCanns haven't been police suspects since 2008, aren't being investigated now and almost certainly never will be again.

That's why they can't solve the case. If they refuse to investigate the McCanns then they'll never get anywhere.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16423 on: February 13, 2026, 03:58:01 PM »
afaik no one here has claimed it was Bruckner, stop being a silly billy.

Yes it was just innocent dad with his Gerry face & trousers, that's what you believe. An unfortunate coincidence & nothing more. Wolters can prove it. Just not any time in the foreseeable future.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #16424 on: February 13, 2026, 04:07:43 PM »

Anyway. Those poor McCanns. They are the constant victims of hate mail & viscous troll attacks day in day out by people who suspect them. Meanwhile, the three expert investigative forces are sitting on an enormous pile of evidence which proves beyond doubt that Madeleine was abducted & that the McCanns definitely didn't murder her. But those selfish policemen, rather than releasing the irrefutable evidence which clears the McCanns, they are keeping it all top secret. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to carry on trolling the McCanns & posting dog shit through their letterbox, since the police seem quite okay with it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club