Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2269627 times)

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17880 on: April 04, 2026, 10:29:43 AM »
What does a person walking down the steps of a plane look like carrying a sleeping two year old.

Gerry. They look like Gerry did on the night of May 3rd.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17881 on: April 04, 2026, 10:33:28 AM »

If we accept that the burden of proof is always on the accuser. Then the burden lies with the McCanns. They're the ones accusing an abductor of having taken Maddie. Yet, despite 19 years, 3 investigative forces & upwards of 14 million spent, the McCanns with all that support are still completely unable to prove there was an abductor. Maybe that's because there wasn't.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17882 on: April 04, 2026, 01:40:52 PM »
The photo was taken on the 16th June, 44 days after the disappearance, so now all his accusers need to do is prove that Gerry had them with him on holiday.  A fuzzy photo of some indistinguishable clothes on a bed simply isn?t proof.

No, but they were described perfectly by a witness of a man carrying a child within minutes of the alarm being raised....[either before or after]


Wearing beige trousers possibly with buttons .....gmc owns a pair of beige trousers with buttons,

Why would she mention buttons ....because over the last few days I have looked every ware and cannot find a single pair...my reason for calling them rare or designer.

Can you find any.....or anyone else on here.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17883 on: April 04, 2026, 01:41:31 PM »
Martin Smith the man he saw didn't look like a tourist by the way he was dressed.

Yet it seems he described gmc

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17884 on: April 04, 2026, 01:43:42 PM »
It must be exceedingly hard work continually trying to prove that The McCanns are guilty.

Not really, there is a lot to go at - especially stuff that wasn't investigated fully. [because it had to be abduction only]

 Proving CB guilty of abduction ...now that is hard work - especially with everything investigated about him.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17885 on: April 04, 2026, 01:43:54 PM »
If we accept that the burden of proof is always on the accuser. Then the burden lies with the McCanns. They're the ones accusing an abductor of having taken Maddie. Yet, despite 19 years, 3 investigative forces & upwards of 14 million spent, the McCanns with all that support are still completely unable to prove there was an abductor. Maybe that's because there wasn't.
I was watching a few more youtube videos recently, Spam, and the official claim by the Portugese police seems to be that Maddie was kept in a fridge somewhere initially before being movedto a final resting place 24 days later with the hire car.
If this is so, Gerry couldn't have dumped Maddie in a bin that night!
Either that, or you disregard the DNA evidence from the car?

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17886 on: April 04, 2026, 01:46:22 PM »
No, they dont look cropped, Kizzy!

Well, unlike others I'm not trying to sway you in anyway,

I'm sure you can make your own mind up about the trousers.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17887 on: April 04, 2026, 01:50:07 PM »
What does a person walking down the steps of a plane look like carrying a sleeping two year old.

Like the man he saw carrying a child he believes was Maddie..as did his family

You can see by the statements Martin Smith makes he is an honourable cautious man who has obviously thought carefully about everything he has said.

It was gmc mannerisms the way he walked tilted his head etc etc. that gave him the flash back of the man he saw carrying that child...the time Maddie went missing.

When he saw gmc comming off that plane.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17888 on: April 04, 2026, 01:54:23 PM »
I was watching a few more youtube videos recently, Spam, and the official claim by the Portugese police seems to be that Maddie was kept in a fridge somewhere initially before being movedto a final resting place 24 days later with the hire car.
If this is so, Gerry couldn't have dumped Maddie in a bin that night!
Either that, or you disregard the DNA evidence from the car?

Far too complex. The simpler explanation is that it wasn't Maddies DNA. The cadaver alerts were cross contamination or simply false. The much, much easier explanation is that Gerry, with his coincidental button trousers was seen carrying his dead daughter before depositing her in the trash. It's just a fact in life that the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Some like to claim that the simpler explanation is that she was abducted. But you need to ignore the most likely sighting of Maddie to reach that conclusion.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17889 on: April 04, 2026, 02:05:16 PM »
I was watching a few more youtube videos recently, Spam, and the official claim by the Portugese police seems to be that Maddie was kept in a fridge somewhere initially before being movedto a final resting place 24 days later with the hire car.
If this is so, Gerry couldn't have dumped Maddie in a bin that night!
Either that, or you disregard the DNA evidence from the car?

I think that was just at the time a possibility....although could be a possibility the car had cross contamination.

Just a thought [trousers again] the check crop trousers kmc wore that was identified as having cadaver on them.

IIRC the reason given was she was present at deceased bodies, before she went to PDL.

The thing I find odd is she wore those same trousers quite often ,,even came home TO UK wearing  them'

That made me wonder if those trousers had some connection to maddie for her....[just a thought really]

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17890 on: April 04, 2026, 02:30:55 PM »

It's just a terribly unfortunate coincidence that the Gerrylike abductor, who changed Maddies pyjama top, it's unfortunate that he happened to wear trousers similar to a pair Gerry owned. Worse still that when Gerry went home to get clothes he happened to pick up those exact similar trousers. I mean, what are the chances really. When you really think about it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17891 on: April 04, 2026, 02:35:39 PM »
It's just a terribly unfortunate coincidence that the Gerrylike abductor, who changed Maddies pyjama top, it's unfortunate that he happened to wear trousers similar to a pair Gerry owned. Worse still that when Gerry went home to get clothes he happened to pick up those exact similar trousers. I mean, what are the chances really. When you really think about it.

Gerry was at the Tapas Bar so forget it.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17892 on: April 04, 2026, 02:40:52 PM »
Gerry was at the Tapas Bar so forget it.

If so then it shouldn't be much longer until the police find his twin brother, with same trousers, who goes round snatching kids & changing their pyjama tops. OK dear.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17893 on: April 04, 2026, 02:45:13 PM »

Innocent Gerrylike coincidental button trousers man with his Maddie clone daughter or Gerrylike abductor, dresses like Gerry, drugged Maddie & changed her pyjama top.

You have to believe either one of those ridiculous conclusions or the simpler answer is that the McCanns did it. So it's obvious the McCanns did it really isn't it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17894 on: April 04, 2026, 02:50:21 PM »
Gerry was at the Tapas Bar so forget it.

You see that is why your posts are so Gullible.