Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh dear, Spam is still clinging to the notion that the Met secretly believe the McCanns dunnit and were trying to force a confession.  Sweet, deluded fool.

No, they are genuinely searching for the pyjama change paedo in order to prove the McCanns didn't do it. They're not having much luck with that though.

[Wonderfulspam]

The only courts to rule on the Mccanns so far are the supreme court in Portugal who said they hadn't been cleared & the ECHR who upheld that ruling.

[misty]

Go away with your ridiculous Murat conspiracy theory. But before you do that, remind us all what the evidence against Brueckner is then? That he allegedly said he dunnit? That's about all there is really. Why do you trust a paedo?

There is so much circumstantial evidence against CB that it kicks your "evidence" into outer space. Why do you think Amaral was so rattled he lied on national TV about CB's appearance and Westfalia's paintwork?

[Eleanor]

Do you think he delivered Maddie to someone on Eleonor's yacht, Lace?

Someone did, I just don't know who.

[Vertigo Swirl]

another interesting revelation about the Smiths is sighting is that Mr Smith who normally wears glasses wasn?t wearing them at the time of the sighting.  So, not only was it dark but he couldn?t see properly either.  But apparently he could see well enough to decide 4 months later it might have been Gerry and well enough to give a full facial description of a man whose face he claimed never to have seen properly 16 whole months later.  Miraculous.

[Wonderfulspam]

There is so much circumstantial evidence against CB that it kicks your "evidence" into outer space. Why do you think Amaral was so rattled he lied on national TV about CB's appearance and Westfalia's paintwork?

List it? Go on. I'm sure it's really compelling, like the no evidence placing him at the scene & the no evidence he gassed Maddie & dragged her out of the window. There's none of that.

[Joe Blogs]

Jesus Christ! You're really not following the evidence Joe. You're indulging in ridiculous fantasy now.

Ha ha! very good, Spam!

[Vertigo Swirl]

Spam now trying to insinuate that the ECHR ruled that the McCanns are still suspects.  A low desperate tactic from a low, desperate troll.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ha ha! very good, Spam!

Double standards though isn?t it?  Spam can indulge in fantasies about Maddie being beaten to death by her mother and thrown in a bin by her father, yet any mention of a getaway vehicle or yacht brings him out in a rage.

[Wonderfulspam]

Double standards though isn?t it?  Spam can indulge in fantasies about Maddie being beaten to death by her mother and thrown in a bin by her father, yet any mention of a getaway vehicle or yacht brings him out in a rage.

I just follow the evidence. The evidence is that the alarm was raised before 10pm, Gerry said they should split up & search, then, the Smiths encounter a Gerrylike man & a Maddie in a questionable status of being. It's not my fault but that is what the evidence shows

[misty]

List it? Go on. I'm sure it's really compelling, like the no evidence placing him at the scene & the no evidence he gassed Maddie & dragged her out of the window. There's none of that.

There is evidence placing him at the scene. It's just not been made public yet.

[Wonderfulspam]

There is evidence placing him at the scene. It's just not been made public yet.

Just trust me bro!

[misty]

Just trust me bro!

HCW said so. You wouldn't want a perp to be forewarned, would you?

[Joe Blogs]

Double standards though isn?t it?  Spam can indulge in fantasies about Maddie being beaten to death by her mother and thrown in a bin by her father, yet any mention of a getaway vehicle or yacht brings him out in a rage.

It would be wrong to rule out any theory that lies within the realms of possibility, Vertigo!

[Wonderfulspam]

HCW said so. You wouldn't want a perp to be forewarned, would you?

Oh dear. You're relying on 'Wolters said so'. That's a little embaressing.