Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry

[jassi]

If someone paid this "£500,000" to Lord Bell, I have yet to see proof it came from the McCanns.

Why would Bell say it was from McCann if it wasn't?

[Robittybob1]

Why would Bell say it was from McCann if it wasn't?

It could have been an incorrect memory, or a slip of the tongue.

[jassi]

It could have been an incorrect memory, or a slip of the tongue.

Why should it be either?
Why wouldn't he know what he was talking about?
No doubt Bell is pretty knowledgeable regarding where his money comes from

[Robittybob1]

Why should it be either?
Why wouldn't he know what he was talking about?
No doubt Bell is pretty knowledgeable regarding where his money comes from

Who knows?

[jassi]

From this very forum 2015 

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6114.0

I'm sure Bell would have been aware of the McCanns willingness to resort to the courts and would have been careful about what he said.
Have McCann or their mouthpiece ever denied Bell's version ?

[G-Unit]

From this very forum 2015 

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6114.0

I'm sure Bell would have been aware of the McCanns willingness to resort to the courts and would have been careful about what he said.
Have McCann or their mouthpiece ever denied Bell's version ?

It makes quite a mess of the McCann's complaints if Bell was telling the truth;

The McCanns complained of press intrusion into their lives after their daughter Madeleine went missing on holiday in Portugal in 2007.
http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/mccanns-challenge-uk-high-court-over-press-inquiry/47431

[Brietta]

It makes quite a mess of the McCann's complaints if Bell was telling the truth;

The McCanns complained of press intrusion into their lives after their daughter Madeleine went missing on holiday in Portugal in 2007.
http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/mccanns-challenge-uk-high-court-over-press-inquiry/47431

                               "IF" being the most salient word in your post.

[Miss Taken Identity]

It makes quite a mess of the McCann's complaints if Bell was telling the truth;

The McCanns complained of press intrusion into their lives after their daughter Madeleine went missing on holiday in Portugal in 2007.
http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/mccanns-challenge-uk-high-court-over-press-inquiry/47431

I believe in Bells claim, he has no reason to lie.

Firstly  we need to understand what this enquiry was about, well first and formemost it WASN'T primarily about Kate N Gerry at all. Even though they do seem to enjoy the old bandwagon thing.....yeah that's right folks,  they never had a phone hacked .

It was THEY who contacted the 'media' it was the who gave their blessings to babble to the 'media' even though it was prohibited.

They started up a company in their daughters name to promote an alleged abduction and took EVERY opportunity to advertise this company and its wares. The Media being used of course for this very purpose.

Hacked off? what really?

It would seem the Kate N Gerry show is losing its appeal and probably even more since the two police investigators are not buying their 'mad monster /paedo gang/ burglar didn't 'snatch' their daugher after all.

mmmm

[G-Unit]

                               "IF" being the most salient word in your post.

Lord Bell. Thatcher's 'spin doctor'. Experienced in advertising and PR. Neither career involves openness and straight talking in my opinion. Yet he made a blunt and unequivocal statement about the McCanns. In my opinion he believed what he said was true.

[Alice Purjorick]

Lord Bell. Thatcher's 'spin doctor'. Experienced in advertising and PR. Neither career involves openness and straight talking in my opinion. Yet he made a blunt and unequivocal statement about the McCanns. In my opinion he believed what he said was true.

We could always use science to give us a helping hand:
https://blog.3dcs.com/what-is-a-tolerance-stack-up

In the McCann case we always use "worst case scenario".
i.e the McCann's version is always gospel and everyone elses is always flaky.....

[G-Unit]

We could always use science to give us a helping hand:
https://blog.3dcs.com/what-is-a-tolerance-stack-up

In the McCann case we always use "worst case scenario".
i.e the McCann's version is always gospel and everyone elses is always flaky.....

It's a fact that the McCanns didn't deny what Lord Bell said, even when accused of hypocrisy;

Mr McCann was roundly slammed on Twitter for "hypocrisy" by senior media commentators as he and his wife Kate have been accused of courting media coverage in the past.

The McCanns reportedly paid PR agency Bell Pottinger £500,000 to keep the case in the media spotlight.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/gerry-mccann-slammed-for-hypocrisy-after-speaking-out-about-press-intrusion-a3219046.html

[faithlilly]

It's a fact that the McCanns didn't deny what Lord Bell said, even when accused of hypocrisy;

Mr McCann was roundly slammed on Twitter for "hypocrisy" by senior media commentators as he and his wife Kate have been accused of courting media coverage in the past.

The McCanns reportedly paid PR agency Bell Pottinger £500,000 to keep the case in the media spotlight.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/gerry-mccann-slammed-for-hypocrisy-after-speaking-out-about-press-intrusion-a3219046.html

I often wonder what Jeffries and the true victims of press intrusion really think of the McCanns.

[Robittybob1]

It's a fact that the McCanns didn't deny what Lord Bell said, even when accused of hypocrisy;

Mr McCann was roundly slammed on Twitter for "hypocrisy" by senior media commentators as he and his wife Kate have been accused of courting media coverage in the past.

The McCanns reportedly paid PR agency Bell Pottinger £500,000 to keep the case in the media spotlight.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/gerry-mccann-slammed-for-hypocrisy-after-speaking-out-about-press-intrusion-a3219046.html

I'm wondering if someone else paid for this on behalf of the McCanns.  i.e. not their decision.

[barrier]

I'm wondering if someone else paid for this on behalf of the McCanns.  i.e. not their decision.

But in their name.

[jassi]

I'm wondering if someone else paid for this on behalf of the McCanns.  i.e. not their decision.

Why are you wondering that?  Have they denied it ?