Would you care to explain why you insist that the way Harrison wrote his reports reveals hidden meanings which only you can decipher? I prefer to read what he wrote and accept what he actually said, not what you think he was too intimidated to say. What a silly idea!
Would you care to explain
why Harrison's original recommendations were interfered with and extended?
Who, in your opinion, interfered with them and extended them?
Why did Harrison wait until
after both inspections to issue PJ personnel with translated instructions on how to conduct inspections in buildings and vehicles?
Even theoretically, what might have come
of benefit to the enquiry in examining clothing, used as clothing commonly is, fully 3 months after the crime?
Any idea?
Why use dogs to re-examine clothing (already examined once without result) in a different location?
Why examine clothing
at all?
What, even theoretically, might have come from examining clothing?
Anything, apart from the canard of 'death-scent on Kate's clothes'?
Any answers?
To any of it?