Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.

[G-Unit]

No he didn't.

You claim he claimed.

Just as Amaral claimed Harrison turned the investigation into one for a little girl assumed dead.

That never happened, either.

Yes he did.

He actually said his first report had recommended all the searches later carried out. It didn't, but he claimed it did. Big deal, he made a mistake.

Even so, the fact remains he took credit for recommending all the searches which he wasn't going to do if he disagreed with any of them.

[John]

Regardless of who recommended which inspection/search by Grime and his dogs, Harrison was tasked in all the inspections and wrote his Report based on them.

[ferryman]

Regardless of who recommended which inspection/search by Grime and his dogs, Harrison was tasked in all the inspections and wrote his Report based on them.

Harrison didn't write his post-inspection summary based on them at all.

[Alice Purjorick]

I suppose it matters not. It will be what the PJ and MPS think about all things doggy, their men and reports that will count.
Should it ever wind up in court I don't see ferryman being called to give expert testimony on the matter of the doggies.

[Mr Gray]

I suppose it matters not. It will be what the PJ and MPS think about all things doggy, their men and reports that will count.
Should it ever wind up in court I don't see ferryman being called to give expert testimony on the matter of the doggies.

We know exactly what the experts think about the alerts because they have told us although some here refuse to accept it

[ferryman]

Aside from retrospectively, to dismiss the exercise in the gym as a 'PJ one', where does Harrison make reference to the gym?

[G-Unit]

Aside from retrospectively, to dismiss the exercise in the gym as a 'PJ one', where does Harrison make reference to the gym?

What you seem to be unable to grasp is that things develop. At the time of writing his first report Harrison recommended searching in certain locations. The aim was to ''provide assurance as to the absence or presence of M McCann's concealed remains.''

Had no dog alerts occurred no extra searches would have been carried out.

After the dogs alerted in 5A the situation changed and in accordance with his terms of reference, so did Harrison's recommendations;

''Consider further opportunities or areas for search in order to locate M McCann as applicable to the latest intelligence and information provided.''
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARK_HARRISON.htm

[John]

Harrison didn't write his post-inspection summary based on them at all.

So what did he base his final report on?

[ferryman]

What you seem to be unable to grasp is that things develop. At the time of writing his first report Harrison recommended searching in certain locations. The aim was to ''provide assurance as to the absence or presence of M McCann's concealed remains.''

Had no dog alerts occurred no extra searches would have been carried out.

After the dogs alerted in 5A the situation changed and in accordance with his terms of reference, so did Harrison's recommendations;

''Consider further opportunities or areas for search in order to locate M McCann as applicable to the latest intelligence and information provided.''
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARK_HARRISON.htm

Preceded by the vital words you conveniently omit: it recommended.

Not, I recommended .....

[slartibartfast]

Preceded by the vital words you conveniently omit: it recommended.

Not, I recommended .....

"It" refers to Harrison's report.

[ferryman]

"It" refers to Harrison's report.

No, it doesn't.

[G-Unit]

No, it doesn't.

Harrison wrote in his final report;

This document follows on from the author’s two previous search documents and provides a summary of the search activity undertaken by the Policia Judiciaria (PJ) in Praia da Luz, Portugal between 20-07-07 and 10-08-07 following the authors search review and submission of his decision support documents.

So it's his third written document. His first one was named “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document” and his second one was named “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”.

He refers again to his first document;

The output of this process of reconnaissance and review was a written document entitled “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document” (see appendix 2) and submitted to the PJ with copies supplied to Leicestershire Police and NPIA on 23-07-07.
It recommended considering re searching:


What did?
Answer; “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document”.
Who wrote it?
Answer; Harrison wrote it. 

[mercury]

LOL
this thread is getting utterly ridiculous

Ferryman, isnt it about time you did another FOI request to put everyone out of their misery?

[ferryman]

Harrison wrote in his final report;

This document follows on from the author’s two previous search documents and provides a summary of the search activity undertaken by the Policia Judiciaria (PJ) in Praia da Luz, Portugal between 20-07-07 and 10-08-07 following the authors search review and submission of his decision support documents.

So it's his third written document. His first one was named “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document” and his second one was named “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”.

He refers again to his first document;

The output of this process of reconnaissance and review was a written document entitled “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document” (see appendix 2) and submitted to the PJ with copies supplied to Leicestershire Police and NPIA on 23-07-07.
It recommended considering re searching:


What did?
Answer; “Madeleine McCann Search Decision Support Document”.
Who wrote it?
Answer; Harrison wrote it.

Nope!

Try again.

[slartibartfast]

No, it doesn't.

So what do you think "It" is?