Author Topic: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting  (Read 70297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #270 on: October 03, 2017, 12:36:21 PM »
I think there's quite a difference between;



and;



You didn't think the bloke with the long hair and moustache was supposed to be Smithman did you?

Offline faithlilly

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #271 on: October 03, 2017, 01:00:11 PM »
You didn't think the bloke with the long hair and moustache was supposed to be Smithman did you?

'The bloke with the long hair' was seen by Gail Cooper and, we are told, Tanner agreed that there was a likeness to Tannerman.

'The bloke' was seen weeks before the McCanns even arrived in Portugal and there is absolutely nothing to connect him to Madeleine's disappearance.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2017, 02:49:44 PM by Faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #272 on: October 03, 2017, 06:47:20 PM »
No wonder Henri Exton thought Tanner was an unreliable witness.
Yet the Smiths with their 50-60% certainty is great! 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #273 on: October 03, 2017, 07:37:52 PM »
Yet the Smiths with their 50-60% certainty is great!

Just one Smith;

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #274 on: October 03, 2017, 08:12:38 PM »
Who is the source of the comments beside the sketch, please?


The power point attached was completed by the McCanns
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #275 on: October 03, 2017, 08:21:25 PM »
Straight from the horse's mouth one might say.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #276 on: October 03, 2017, 08:25:22 PM »
Page 3965 is an eye opener.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #277 on: October 03, 2017, 08:27:49 PM »

The power point attached was completed by the McCanns
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm

No wonder Amaral thought the McCanns were leading the Brtish police by the noses.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #278 on: October 03, 2017, 08:33:11 PM »

Okay.  That's enough now.  I will be deleting shortly.


Offline G-Unit

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Angelo222

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #281 on: October 04, 2017, 12:32:53 AM »
Look! Maroon shirt????

Like the one Crecheman wore?  She probably mistook his jacket for a shirt.

De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline misty

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #282 on: October 04, 2017, 12:42:35 AM »
Like the one Crecheman wore?  She probably mistook his jacket for a shirt.



Jane did not describe a shirt of any colour.
In my opinion, Crecheman is too tall & slim to be Tannerman. Observe the "derriere" definition on the Tannerman image compared to Crecheman.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2017, 08:19:53 AM by Slartibartfast »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #283 on: October 04, 2017, 05:50:11 AM »
Jane did not describe a shirt of any colour.
Crecheman is too tall & slim to be Tannerman. Observe the "derriere" definition on the Tannerman image compared to Crecheman.
IMO.
Where is that Misty?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The investigation into the Smith family's sighting
« Reply #284 on: October 04, 2017, 08:56:08 AM »
Jane did not describe a shirt of any colour.
In my opinion, Crecheman is too tall & slim to be Tannerman. Observe the "derriere" definition on the Tannerman image compared to Crecheman.

You do know that Tannerman is a drawing and not a photograph?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?