Author Topic: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)  (Read 566345 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #345 on: December 24, 2014, 04:59:25 PM »
The dogs solved this case.

And I am the Queen of Sheba ...

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #346 on: December 24, 2014, 05:10:48 PM »
The spurious and often inaccurately reported forensic findings, the irrelevant behaviour of the cadaver dogs, Mr and Mrs McCann’s perceived demeanour, as well as many other totally irrelevant points just fuel this uninformed and I must say offensive conjecture. The simple answer is, there is no information, let alone evidence to indicate their involvement in any way. Should they have supervised their children more closely that night? That is not for me to say, but regardless of the answer, it does not assist the investigation in any way.

Ian Horrocks.

http://www.bgpglobalservices.com/announcements/what-happened-to-madeleine-mccann
« Last Edit: December 24, 2014, 05:21:18 PM by ferryman »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #347 on: December 24, 2014, 05:19:39 PM »
The spurious and often inaccurately reported forensic findings, the irrelevant behaviour of the cadaver dogs, Mr and Mrs McCann’s perceived demeanour, as well as many other totally irrelevant points just fuel this uninformed and I must say offensive conjecture. The simple answer is, there is no information, let alone evidence to indicate their involvement in any way. Should they have supervised their children more closely that night? That is not for me to say, but regardless of the answer, it does not assist the investigation in any way.

Ian Horrocks.

and Ian Horrocks was involved in the Barry George case.

Try again Queen of Sheba. 8((()*/

Offline jassi

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #348 on: December 24, 2014, 05:31:58 PM »
The spurious and often inaccurately reported forensic findings, the irrelevant behaviour of the cadaver dogs, Mr and Mrs McCann’s perceived demeanour, as well as many other totally irrelevant points just fuel this uninformed and I must say offensive conjecture. The simple answer is, there is no information, let alone evidence to indicate their involvement in any way. Should they have supervised their children more closely that night? That is not for me to say, but regardless of the answer, it does not assist the investigation in any way.

Ian Horrocks.

http://www.bgpglobalservices.com/announcements/what-happened-to-madeleine-mccann

Why should you feel offended ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #349 on: December 24, 2014, 05:35:50 PM »
and Ian Horrocks was involved in the Barry George case.

Try again Queen of Sheba. 8((()*/

If barry George had been arrested in Portugal he would now be in prison for life having confessed

Offline Montclair

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #350 on: December 24, 2014, 06:35:00 PM »
If barry George had been arrested in Portugal he would now be in prison for life having confessed

Sorry, no life sentences in Portugal. The most anyone can get is 25 years, even if they murder 10 people.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #351 on: December 24, 2014, 06:51:16 PM »
Sorry, no life sentences in Portugal. The most anyone can get is 25 years, even if they murder 10 people.

in the uk...life is 15 years

Offline pegasus

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #352 on: December 24, 2014, 09:32:16 PM »
Was it rumoured in the latest news that the current investigation leader worked on the Addington case?
Is that right? Now wasn't the huge mistake in that case that the investigation assumed a far too early time for exiting the premises?

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #353 on: December 24, 2014, 11:59:39 PM »
Was it rumoured in the latest news that the current investigation leader worked on the Addington case?
Is that right? Now wasn't the huge mistake in that case that the investigation assumed a far too early time for exiting the premises?

That would appear to be the stuation ... that they may have been considered to have left the premises too early could possibly have been due to an over reliance on the nose of a dog.

** snip**
She oversaw the investigation into the murder of Tia Sharp, whose body was found in the loft of her grandmother's house in New Addington, south London, days after she went missing in August 2012.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2869936/Female-Met-officer-taking-Madeleine-McCann-inquiry-arrives-Portugal-ahead-questioning-former-suspect-Robert-Murat.html#ixzz3MrXnz994
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #354 on: December 25, 2014, 12:15:44 AM »
Despite four searches by police officers using sniffer dogs, it was not until a specialist dog was taken in, that Tia's remains were found.

Met Commander Neil Basu, who was responsible for finding Tia, insisted the murder victim’s body was ‘well concealed’.
He said a review found ‘human error’ in how the searches were conducted and managed was to blame for the extraordinary mistake.

He added that the PC who first searched the loft was ‘inexperienced’ and he was given ‘words of advice’, the lowest form of disciplinary sanction.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324061/Tia-Sharp-Met-forced-apologise-family-FOUR-searches-failed-spot-body.html
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #355 on: December 26, 2014, 01:46:57 AM »
In that south London case the failure to solve the case for a whole 5 days was due entirely to a drastically incorrect assumption by investigators about time of leaving residence.
Now look at first page of final report in the Portugal case and find a similar assumption.


ferryman

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #356 on: December 26, 2014, 03:41:23 PM »
Sorry, no life sentences in Portugal. The most anyone can get is 25 years, even if they murder 10 people.

In England, sentences where a  term of imprisonment is specified can still be referred to as a 'life' term.

Semantic nit-picking is scarcely conducive to constructive debate ...

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/sentencing/Life-sentences.htm


Offline misty

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #357 on: December 26, 2014, 04:29:47 PM »
In that south London case the failure to solve the case for a whole 5 days was due entirely to a drastically incorrect assumption by investigators about time of leaving residence.
Now look at first page of final report in the Portugal case and find a similar assumption.

I rather thought it was the inability of the police to conduct a thorough search of the property on more than one occasion in the Sharpe case.

Offline pegasus

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #358 on: December 28, 2014, 12:57:39 AM »
I rather thought it was the inability of the police to conduct a thorough search of the property on more than one occasion in the Sharpe case.
From the moment the police arrived they subconsciously assumed that the object of their search was not in the premises. Therefore they did not search as thoroughly as they should inside - they missed places. And those are not the only two cases where this happened - here are two more - the Turner case - and the Castillo case.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2014, 01:08:25 AM by pegasus »

Offline misty

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #359 on: December 28, 2014, 01:41:29 AM »
From the moment the police arrived they subconsciously assumed that the object of their search was not in the premises. Therefore they did not search as thoroughly as they should inside - they missed places. And those are not the only two cases where this happened - here are two more - the Turner case - and the Castillo case.

I am not familiar with the 2 other cases to which you refer - would you be good enough to provide Christian names, please?
The subconscious assumption that TS was not on the premises - would that not have altered the moment the officers became aware of the background of the last known person to see her? I find it very distressing that the police in situ were just so damned incompetent.