Jeremy Bamber - a lost cause

[Matthew Wyse]

The blue forum continually go on about 'new evidence' which obviously doesn't exist because Jeremy Bamber is still inside. I think it's probably time for them to accept he's as guilty as can be and to really stop debating the issue to within a milimeter of it's life. It's all very batty to continue pushing the issue, he isn't coming out, other than in a box. They need to find other things to debate.

But that's their whole reason for existing [Name removed]o.  Without Jeremy there is no blur forum.   

[Matthew Wyse]

The Blue forum should understand our stance; there is a mountain of evidence that Sheila could not have fired that rifle and is a victim of murder and anyone who accuses her of murdering her adored sons and parents is doing her a massive injustice.

Any sensible and reasonable person need only to read the extent of the fight injuries to Neville to realise that Sheila could never have beaten him so badly and remained forensically clean. Neville was hit so hard it broke his jaw and broke the rifle's stock; Sheila didn't even have a bruise on her!

I think it is reasonable to say that no one who reads the evidence of Sheila's condition after death can possibly accuse her of those 5 murders and expect to be taken seriously!   

I don't know how anyone can convince some members of the Blue Forum that it is incredibly unlikely that Sheila could have been responsible. Besides the evidence which is so clearly outlined in the thread on Sheila'S INNOCENCE , I have heard from a number of people who knew Sheila well and indeed from her early childhood, that this act would have been totally out of character. Her psychiatric history has been much distorted by people who ought to know better. People on the Blue Forum who claim to support the cause of fighting injustice  !
 
The really terrible and disgusting injustice has been to defame the memory of Sheila and other victims of this evil crime. Patti who appears to be one of the few reasonable posters on Tesko's forum, seems to have expressed some doubts as to Sheila's responsibility whilst doggedly maintaining a belief in Bamber's innocence putting foward the " third party " argument , which really does not stand up to much scrutiny.   

If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.  Does Mike Tesko think that by introducing all these pseudo silly inventions into the mix that the public will be somehow conned?   And there was me thinking he was a sensible fellow???    >@@(*&)

[John]

I have hopes for David, Patti and Grahame yet!   

[Tim Invictus]

I have hopes for David, Patti and Grahame yet!   

Patti I believe has questioned the evidence and recognises that Sheila's condition after the murders and her personality mean she must be innocent. I think this does bother her and makes her question Bamber's innocence. Patti is both smart and honest ... I predict she will be the next one to see that Sheila is suffering a great injustice at the hands of the Bamberettes!

Luggy Grahame and David would blow with the wind; both are more interested in their positions and how they appear to others than the truth  of the case!   

[puglove]

I have hopes for David, Patti and Grahame yet!   

D knows fine well that Bamber is guilty, but he needs a cause to fight, and he's got a Corporal Jones/Captain Mainwaring thing going on with Mike. As for G, I would invite everyone to cast their minds back to the 20th of August when, for half a shining, glorious hour, he held the power of the blue forum in trembling, incredulous hands.

Then he had a Beltdown, pooed himself and ran off crying.

[John]

It looks like Mike Teskowski has accepted the inevitable.  No more Ali Bongo or elusive meetings with Z while a helicopter hovers overhead?     

Maybe he will go back to blowing bubbles over the Madeleine McCann case now that he has lost the Bamber case.   

[Padgates staff]

They could start looking for Lord Lucan-I heard he was in Botswana if thats any help 

[Tim Invictus]

It looks like Mike Teskowski has accepted the inevitable.  No more Ali Bongo or elusive meetings with Z while a helicopter hovers overhead?     

Maybe he will go back to blowing bubbles over the Madeleine McCann case now that he has lost the Bamber case.   

 Blimey hasn't Tesko found Maddie and Keith Bennett yet? He said he would!

[ActualMat]

Want to know why the CCRC rejected the Bamber case?
Want to know why all future Bamber CCRC submissions will be rejected?
Want to know why Bamber will never get out of prison?

Read Nicko's post on the blue forum tonight. SPOT on. Man knows the case.

[BB]

and Mr Tesko... he is not the slightest bit interested in Jeremy Bamber. His only motive is to try and bring discredit on the the police and the prison system, which have been the bane of his life, because he chose criminality as a career choice. All of his posts are written in the hope that he will persuade others that all 'coppers and screws' are b*stards and that he will, by some sheer fluke or legal technicality, unearth some great conspiracy that will expose the justice system and bring heads to roll. This would maybe enable him to take comfort in feeling that he 'got the b*stards back'. Well, guess what Mr Tesko, you are a criminal because you chose to be a criminal and you achieved little positive in your life because of it. It was the fault of nobody else but your own selfish desires for material gain at the expense of others. You gain as much sympathy as you deserve. Most of us have achieved in life because we've worked hard, have sound values and recognise what's important - and don't live our lives through an internet forum because we are consumed with hatred for the police.

Ooh er missus, where did that come from? 

[puglove]

and Mr Tesko... he is not the slightest bit interested in Jeremy Bamber. His only motive is to try and bring discredit on the the police and the prison system, which have been the bane of his life, because he chose criminality as a career choice. All of his posts are written in the hope that he will persuade others that all 'coppers and screws' are b*stards and that he will, by some sheer fluke or legal technicality, unearth some great conspiracy that will expose the justice system and bring heads to roll. This would maybe enable him to take comfort in feeling that he 'got the b*stards back'. Well, guess what Mr Tesko, you are a criminal because you chose to be a criminal and you achieved little positive in your life because of it. It was the fault of nobody else but your own selfish desires for material gain at the expense of others. You gain as much sympathy as you deserve. Most of us have achieved in life because we've worked hard, have sound values and recognise what's important - and don't live our lives through an internet forum because we are consumed with hatred for the police.

Ooh er missus, where did that come from? 

Don't know, but I'm glad that it did!!  ROCK ON!!!!

[puglove]

and Mr Tesko... he is not the slightest bit interested in Jeremy Bamber. His only motive is to try and bring discredit on the the police and the prison system, which have been the bane of his life, because he chose criminality as a career choice. All of his posts are written in the hope that he will persuade others that all 'coppers and screws' are b*stards and that he will, by some sheer fluke or legal technicality, unearth some great conspiracy that will expose the justice system and bring heads to roll. This would maybe enable him to take comfort in feeling that he 'got the b*stards back'. Well, guess what Mr Tesko, you are a criminal because you chose to be a criminal and you achieved little positive in your life because of it. It was the fault of nobody else but your own selfish desires for material gain at the expense of others. You gain as much sympathy as you deserve. Most of us have achieved in life because we've worked hard, have sound values and recognise what's important - and don't live our lives through an internet forum because we are consumed with hatred for the police.

Ooh er missus, where did that come from? 

Although Bamber has pleaded with Mike to quit his nonsense, if anything he's become more and more outrageous to the point of silliness. ("To stimulate debate" my ar$e.)

And I also think that it is very telling that most of Bamber's last few supporters are ladies who, although they haven't met him (although, apparently, at least one would be able to judge his "innocence" just by looking at him) they insist on portraying him as some twinkly-eyed, farm-loving scamp.

[Dillon]

The motives of people who continue to support Bamber in defiance of reason does seem complicated. Maybe some do need a cause, others bored and lonely, individuals also trying like Teskowski to get their own back on " the system " . I find the notion of being able to tell that someone is innocent by just meeting them charmingly naive, particularly if the profile of the individual concerned is likely to fit that of psychopathy. Surprising too in someone who apparently has had a career in working in mental health. Gosh, some of your patients must have pulled the wool over your eyes as you looked on (out).  The blue forum seems to be running out of steam in endlessly pursuing much travelled issues in the case and to be turning into a more benign social media site. I still wonder where someone like NGB fits in to this though. Hardly his sort of social circle. Yet he still seems to be hanging on in whilst never really seeming to explicitly state his belief in Bamber's innocence. A lost cause surely from a businessman's perspective ?  Or is his support for Bamber just pure altruism ? I predict that he will quietly slip out of sight over the next few months.

[Padgates staff]

The whole debate surrounding JB seems to be going round and round in circles. Someone brave needs to pull the blinds down and either tell them it's time to call it quits or find something else to debate which is already being done anyway but even when I've read the other boards, trying to debate the subject is futile.
One of the posters is just about illiterate and spells how they speak (sometimes) and I get the jist that when they get a member who is vaguely intellegent they don't really like it which is a shame but they could always join here.

[puglove]

The whole debate surrounding JB seems to be going round and round in circles. Someone brave needs to pull the blinds down and either tell them it's time to call it quits or find something else to debate which is already being done anyway but even when I've read the other boards, trying to debate the subject is futile.
One of the posters is just about illiterate and spells how they speak (sometimes) and I get the jist that when they get a member who is vaguely intellegent they don't really like it which is a shame but they could always join here.

No, Jo, not here. The blue forum is just twitter for the terminally bewildered - look how they shoot Steve UK down then flirt with him. And Rochy must be crapping himself, two old ladies want him to kiss them.