Author Topic: What was the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann?  (Read 34513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Well let's see  *%6^

For starters, two sniffer dogs deployed independently very shortly after she was reported missing followed HER SCENT out of the apartment and around the block to the car park opposite mini reception where it mysteriously disappeared just like her.

It should be taken into account that the second sniffer dog may have been conditioned by the first sniffer dog. That is to say that in the case of doubt, the second dog may have followed the second of the first.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/ANTONIO_SILVA.htm

you need to read the files to get a true picture of the evidence you are relying on

Offline Mr Gray

Try thinking outside the box davel.  Several British detectives also agree that it is a distinct possibility.

Its two uk detectives...and they don't have all the evidence

Offline Angelo222

Its two uk detectives...and they don't have all the evidence

Have you not seen the video depicting a large group of retired senior detectives who considered woke and wandered a distinct possibility?  It's common sense in any event as there was no evidence whatsoever of any intruder having entered 5a.

Now back to the thread theme, the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann.  Clearly they were questions which were selected in order to establish the suspects genuineness to cooperating with the investigation.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2018, 01:36:24 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

What's the point when you obviously  have a very short memory.. You will forget it all tomorrow... It's, all been done before...

You are not answering Davel because you know that there is no evidence.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

You are not answering Davel because you know that there is no evidence.

You are welcome to think what you want... It's of no importance

Offline faithlilly

You are welcome to think what you want... It's of no importance

Rather like an opinion not backed up with evidence.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Have you not seen the video depicting a large group of retired senior detectives who considered woke and wandered a distinct possibility?  It's common sense in any event as there was no evidence whatsoever of any intruder having entered 5a.

Now back to the thread theme, the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann.  Clearly they were questions which were selected in order to establish the suspects genuineness to cooperating with the investigation.

Indeed! And it was interesting that Kate refused to answer such questions, and one has to wonder why?

 leaving no stone unturned one would have thought  the inconvenience of being questioned during a stressful time, would be worth it to be ruled out as a suspect and for the PJ to then direct another theory. IMO
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Robittybob1

Indeed! And it was interesting that Kate refused to answer such questions, and one has to wonder why?

 leaving no stone unturned one would have thought  the inconvenience of being questioned during a stressful time, would be worth it to be ruled out as a suspect and for the PJ to then direct another theory. IMO

Which of the 48 questions relate to the woke and wandered scenario?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Rather like an opinion not backed up with evidence.

Funny how some when backed into a corner always say "it is of no importance" having spent three pages arguing the toss over it.... *%87
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline sadie

Have you not seen the video depicting a large group of retired senior detectives who considered woke and wandered a distinct possibility?  It's common sense in any event as there was no evidence whatsoever of any intruder having entered 5a.

Now back to the thread theme, the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann.  Clearly they were questions which were selected in order to establish the suspects genuineness to cooperating with the investigation.

If you are thinking of the same video that I am, it is risible.  They got so much wrong, imo of course.

They seemed to be led by one ex officer who pushed his agenda and they all agreed

Offline Robittybob1

Which of the 48 questions relate to the woke and wandered scenario?

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/48_Questions_07_09_07.htm

"01--- Asked, on May 03, 2007, at 22:00, when she entered the apartment what she saw and did, where he looked, and what she touched [handled], she did not respond."   

That would be the most important in an simple woke and wandered situation.  I.e. were the doors and gates found opened more than they should?


"06 --- Asked why she said from the outset that MADELEINE was kidnapped [abducted], she did not respond."

If Kate is thinking Madeleine was abducted from the apartment that thought rules out woke and wandered.

"08 ---Why she had not asked the twins at that time what had happened to their sister, or why she had not asked them later, she did not respond."

So does that mean Kate had told them at an earlier time she had not asked the twins what had happened?    Why didn't the PJ do it themselves if it was so important.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Some of the questions asked of Kate McCann suggest that the PJ had suspicions that her relationships with her children were not as smooth as had been claimed. According to the Portuguese media it was her diaries which aroused these suspicions. As her diaries were not allowed to be included in the files we can't check what she actually wrote in them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Some of the questions asked of Kate McCann suggest that the PJ had suspicions that her relationships with her children were not as smooth as had been claimed. According to the Portuguese media it was her diaries which aroused these suspicions. As her diaries were not allowed to be included in the files we can't check what she actually wrote in them.

What questions were those in your opinion?

Rightly so did Portuguese judge Pedro dos Anjos Frios instruct the PJ to destroy photocopies of Kate's private diary and disallowed the inclusion as 'evidence'.
That a prejudicial version which could only have had one source was leaked to the Portuguese press is in my opinion yet another disgrace and tends to confirm Philomena McCann's opinion that it was "just another way to stick the knife in".

I don't see the point of your post in repeating nonsensical allegations wrongly released and wrongly printed in the Portuguese press. Amaral's book gives us his take on what aroused his and his team's suspicion and makes no mention of the diary. 
The News of the World allayed any curiosity anyone might have by jumping the gun and printing it too. http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/19-Sep8/NOTW-14-09-08.htm Leveson was less than complementary about that infringement.

So even a prop designed to be cathartic in an hour of need was twisted and turned to be used against Kate and is continued even today.

Snip
Kate was frequently seen writing her journal in private moments after Madeleine went missing from the family's holiday apartment in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz 133 days ago.

Philomena McCann, Gerry's sister, said she advised her sister-in-law to keep the diary to show Madeleine how much they loved her.

She said: "I asked Kate to keep this journal because at first the Portuguese police were doing very little.

"A lot of the things that happened were only because of the family contacting the media.

"So I said to Kate that it would be a good idea if someone wrote down, for Madeleine, notes on everything that was happening, because we have to prove to Madeleine how much we looked for her and how much we love her.

"That wee girl will be thinking, 'They're not looking for me. My mummy, daddy and my aunties - they don't love me because they can't find me'.

"I was just thinking about how insecure Madeleine would be, so Kate has been keeping that journal faithfully every day.

"She's been writing down everything that we've been doing so we can prove to Madeleine that we have worked so hard to try and find her, that we've put our lives on hold to search for her and show our love for her is unending."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-481645/McCanns-facing-fresh-slurs-Portuguese-press-Kates-diaries.html#ixzz5B2kcpOOq
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

What questions were those in your opinion?

Rightly so did Portuguese judge Pedro dos Anjos Frios instruct the PJ to destroy photocopies of Kate's private diary and disallowed the inclusion as 'evidence'.
That a prejudicial version which could only have had one source was leaked to the Portuguese press is in my opinion yet another disgrace and tends to confirm Philomena McCann's opinion that it was "just another way to stick the knife in".

I don't see the point of your post in repeating nonsensical allegations wrongly released and wrongly printed in the Portuguese press. Amaral's book gives us his take on what aroused his and his team's suspicion and makes no mention of the diary. 
The News of the World allayed any curiosity anyone might have by jumping the gun and printing it too. http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/19-Sep8/NOTW-14-09-08.htm Leveson was less than complementary about that infringement.

So even a prop designed to be cathartic in an hour of need was twisted and turned to be used against Kate and is continued even today.

Snip
Kate was frequently seen writing her journal in private moments after Madeleine went missing from the family's holiday apartment in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz 133 days ago.

Philomena McCann, Gerry's sister, said she advised her sister-in-law to keep the diary to show Madeleine how much they loved her.

She said: "I asked Kate to keep this journal because at first the Portuguese police were doing very little.

"A lot of the things that happened were only because of the family contacting the media.

"So I said to Kate that it would be a good idea if someone wrote down, for Madeleine, notes on everything that was happening, because we have to prove to Madeleine how much we looked for her and how much we love her.

"That wee girl will be thinking, 'They're not looking for me. My mummy, daddy and my aunties - they don't love me because they can't find me'.

"I was just thinking about how insecure Madeleine would be, so Kate has been keeping that journal faithfully every day.

"She's been writing down everything that we've been doing so we can prove to Madeleine that we have worked so hard to try and find her, that we've put our lives on hold to search for her and show our love for her is unending."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-481645/McCanns-facing-fresh-slurs-Portuguese-press-Kates-diaries.html#ixzz5B2kcpOOq

Asked whether or not it is true that the twins have difficulty sleeping, that they are restless and that that causes her uneasiness, she did not respond.

--- Asked whether or not it is true that at certain times she felt desperate [driven to despair; angered; exasperated] by the attitude of the children and that that left her much disquiet [unease], she did not respond.

--- Asked whether or not it is true that in England she was thinking to deliver MADELEINE into the custody [guardianship] of a family member, she did not respond.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_07-09-07.htm

The News of the World printed some of her diary entries, but did they print all of them? Clearly not;

The 135-page journal covering April 28, 2007 to Tuesday, July 31
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/19-Sep8/NOTW-14-09-08.htm

April 28th -30th and May 1st and 2nd weren't printed.

According to Kate McCann it wasn't a family member who suggested writing things down;

Hugh asked me whether I was keeping a diary. Quite apart from the fact that I was an emotional wreck and hadn’t had time to blink for the past week, the idea had never crossed my mind. I hadn’t kept a diary since my early teens......I didn’t begin in earnest until 23 May, twenty days after Madeleine was taken......I went back and filled in the blank pages with notes of our activities and my recollections of every day since 3 May 2007. [madeleine]

So did Kate go back to 28th April or 3rd May? Was it Philomena's suggestion or Hugh's? What did the undisclosed entries say?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

This interview appears to be around the time of the arguido interview.

She says they won't be refusing to answer any questions.  Strange?  https://youtu.be/wOkpiJ6DEco
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.