Author Topic: The Calpol claim revisited.  (Read 83296 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #180 on: July 18, 2018, 12:16:28 PM »
Perhaps I should have put Calpol Night revisited then it may not have been a laugh.  We have 12 pages of calpol revisited so why not calpol night?

Not all of us have been discussing the case for years and I couldn't find anything on the night version on here so I thought it may be worth discussing. Clearly not though.

Sunny, as a forum member, you are well within the criteria of discussing calpol nights AS those who mock you have no debate worth mentioning. You are on topic.


I find it interesting when Kate suggested the children may have been drugged- as a trained anaesthetist- she didn't offer what kind of drug may have been use.  We need to remember that when offering sedation to children for operations etc, weight, height and age and likely length of operation are ALL VERY IMPORTANT  factors! To ensure no under or over dose is administered.


'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #181 on: July 18, 2018, 12:22:32 PM »
Indeed it is.  It is independent verification that music from the bar mixed with the hubbub of chatter from the restaurant as was experienced by the author might well have been replicated on the 3rd.
People were on holiday and relaxed ... but anyway, what about this Calpol thingy we should be discussing here?  Do you think that now people are well aware that Calpol has no sedative properties proving Amaral's error (couch ... bang! ... and non existent blood splatter), yet another error of Amaral's making ... that some interest in the topic has been lost?
Strange when one remembers it was a pivotal part of his theory.


Are you suggesting the music and chatter was so loud, they couldn't hear the children crying as like sitting in the garden like?
Interesting...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #182 on: July 18, 2018, 12:43:52 PM »
Sunny, as a forum member, you are well within the criteria of discussing calpol nights AS those who mock you have no debate worth mentioning. You are on topic.


I find it interesting when Kate suggested the children may have been drugged- as a trained anaesthetist- she didn't offer what kind of drug may have been use. We need to remember that when offering sedation to children for operations etc, weight, height and age and likely length of operation are ALL VERY IMPORTANT  factors! To ensure no under or over dose is administered.
Why do we need to remember that, exactly?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #183 on: July 18, 2018, 12:53:30 PM »
Why do we need to remember that, exactly?

You and fellow supporters do not need to. It is way above your understanding- not your fault but you could always 'google' if you really wanted to know.

To other readers interested...

an underdose would envoke a patient waking up during an operation, and an overdose? well worst case scenario =death!

Skeptics on the other hand, well we just keep coming up with posts which the supporters can't handle in a debate situation.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #184 on: July 18, 2018, 12:55:52 PM »
You and fellow supporters do not need to. It is way above your understanding- not your fault but you could always 'google' if you really wanted to know.

To other readers interested...

an underdose would envoke a patient waking up during an operation, and an overdose? well worst case scenario =death!

Skeptics on the other hand, well we just keep coming up with posts which the supporters can't handle in a debate situation.
Don't get too personal.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #185 on: July 18, 2018, 12:59:33 PM »
Perhaps I should have put Calpol Night revisited then it may not have been a laugh.  We have 12 pages of calpol revisited so why not calpol night?

Not all of us have been discussing the case for years and I couldn't find anything on the night version on here so I thought it may be worth discussing. Clearly not though.

Because it triggers apoplexy and verbal diarrhoea where half a dozen or fewer bullet points would do the job.
 8(0(*
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #186 on: July 18, 2018, 01:00:51 PM »
You and fellow supporters do not need to. It is way above your understanding- not your fault but you could always 'google' if you really wanted to know.

To other readers interested...

an underdose would envoke a patient waking up during an operation, and an overdose? well worst case scenario =death!

Skeptics on the other hand, well we just keep coming up with posts which the supporters can't handle in a debate situation.
What a rude post, and inaccurate too.  If you can't say why this information is relevant on the Calpol thread then just admit it.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:22:41 AM by Angelo222 »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #187 on: July 18, 2018, 01:31:22 PM »
Apparently we all NEED to remember that the amount of sedation given to a child prior to an operation is VERY IMPORTANT.  Being a supporter I'm not intelligent enough to understand why, in the context of this thread about the Calpol claim  it is such an imperative, perhaps one with more intelligence and superior debating skills than me could explain? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #188 on: July 18, 2018, 04:22:53 PM »
Because it triggers apoplexy and verbal diarrhoea where half a dozen or fewer bullet points would do the job.
 8(0(*


or because debate on the topic is  total waste of time when some posters dont understand that the fact that calpol night was not available is totally insignificant...and they dont realise why

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #189 on: July 18, 2018, 04:32:49 PM »
One point ive noticed is that sceptics seem to thnk sedation  and anaesthesia are the same thing
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:25:58 AM by Angelo222 »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #190 on: July 18, 2018, 05:02:17 PM »
The claim that these professional people were involved in some sort of conspiracy is simply too crazy for words.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:26:49 AM by Angelo222 »

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #191 on: July 18, 2018, 05:38:24 PM »
The claim that these professional people were involved in some sort of conspiracy is simply too crazy for words.

Is that because they are 'professional', or because they are 'these'?
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:27:15 AM by Angelo222 »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #192 on: July 18, 2018, 05:54:10 PM »
Is that because they are 'professional', or because they are 'these'?

you might find it strange but those are not my words...but those of another poster...can you guess who?

Offline Lace

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #193 on: July 18, 2018, 06:20:29 PM »
You and fellow supporters do not need to. It is way above your understanding- not your fault but you could always 'google' if you really wanted to know.

To other readers interested...

an underdose would envoke a patient waking up during an operation, and an overdose? well worst case scenario =death!

Skeptics on the other hand, well we just keep coming up with posts which the supporters can't handle in a debate situation.

an underdose would envoke a patient waking up during an operation, and an overdose? well worst case scenario =death!   

You don't say,  Sherlock!!!








Offline Lace

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #194 on: July 18, 2018, 06:23:50 PM »
That’s cos they are way more intelligent than supporters innit.


Yeah like we know nuffink init.